• Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;
ZHONG Renming, Email: zrm_100@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To compare the dosimetric differences among flattening filter free intensity modulated radiotherapy (3FIMRT), flattening filter free volumetric modulated arc therapy (3FVMAT), filter free intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and filter free volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hyperthyroidism exophthalmus patients.Methods Computed tomography (CT) scans of 29 patients, who were diagnosed with hyperthyroidism exophthalmus and treated with radiation therapy between September 2016 and September 2017, were selected for study. Four treatment plans with the same dose prescription and objective constrains were designed for each patient based on their images, consisting of IMRT, VMAT, 3FIMRT, and 3FVMAT. The target dosimetric distribution, normal tissue radiation dose, monitor units, and treatment time of each plan were evaluated.Results Four types of plans were all able to satisfy the clinical treatment requirements, and there were no significant differences in maximum dose, mean dose (Dmean), homogeneity index of the targets (P>0.05). For the parameters minimum dose, V50%, conformity index (CI), gradient index of the targets, statistically significant differences were observed among the four kinds of technologies (F=10.920, 35.860, 11.320, 17.790; P<0.05). The CI of IMRT and 3FIMRT were superior to those of VMAT and 3FVMAT, but there was no significant difference between IMRT and 3FIMRT. In terms of Lens Dmean and Brain Dmean, statistically significant differences were observed among the four kinds of technologies (F=5.054, 83.780; P<0.05). For Lens Dmean and Brain Dmean, 3FVMAT achieved better sparing effects when compared with the other three plans. The total monitor units and treatment time did not significantly differ between 3FVMAT and VMAT. The mean monitor units of 3FVMAT were 65.07% and 70.22% less than that of IMRT and 3FIMRT respectively. The mean treatment time of 3FVMAT were 48.1% and 35.24% less than that of IMRT and 3FIMRT respectively.Conclusion 3FVMAT can bring more dosimetric advantages for hyperthyroidism exophthalmus radiation therapy when compared with IMRT, 3FIMRT, and VMAT.

Citation: LAI Jialu, LIU Shoupeng, ZHANG Qin, BAI Sen, ZHONG Renming. A dosimetric study of intensity modulated radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy for hyperthyroidism exophthalmus patients using flattening filter free or flattening filter modes. West China Medical Journal, 2019, 34(2): 172-178. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201810017 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Investigation and analysis of preoperative cognition and health education service needs of ophthalmic fundus day surgery patients
  • Next Article

    The practice and thoughts on standardization of ambulatory surgery management in Shanghai