• 1. Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence Based Medicine, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University / Beijing Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100010, P. R. China;
  • 2. First School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine & School of Public Health, Kyoto 606-8316, Japan;
LI Bo, Email: libo@bjzhongyi.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Evidence-based research is the essential method for the modernization of traditional medicine. China and Japan have made great progress in traditional Chinese medicine and Japanese Kampo medicine after years of evidence-based research, but there are also shortcomings. This paper compares the current situation of evidence-based research in traditional medicine from the aspects of the system of clinical evidence production and evaluation, standardization of clinical research report, standardization of traditional medicine in China and Japan, evaluation of the totality of clinical evidence via systematic review, application of clinical evidence via clinical practice guideline and development of research methodology. The purpose of this paper is to seek mutually complementary fields, and to provide enlightenment for future Chinese medicine and Japanese Kampo medicine evidence-based cooperation research.

Citation: YUAN Zhongyu, Nakayama Takeo, Mori Rintaro, LI Bo. Comparison of evidence-based research in traditional medicine between China and Japan. West China Medical Journal, 2021, 36(4): 539-544. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202004019 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Standardized management and whole process quality control of special pathological staining technology
  • Next Article

    医护合作处理肾移植术后造口旁复杂伤口一例