• Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
LI Bo, Email: cdhxlb@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To summarize the current comparison of the efficacy of different treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.Method To search the literatures about the comparative studies on the efficacy of different treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in recent years and analyze them.Results In the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, percutaneous arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation could improve the survival rate and tumor-free survival rate to some extent, compared with the single use of percutaneous arterial chemoembolization. In the short term, there was no difference in efficacy between radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection, but the local recurrence rate of radiofrequency ablation was higher than that of surgical resection group. Salvage liver transplantation offered potential opportunity to reduce the risk of recurrence and tended to improve long-term survival outcomes, but liver sources were scarce and costly. Conclusions At present, there is no systematic staging scheme and treatment system for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. At the same time, most studies are retrospective, and more prospective studies are needed to further explore the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Citation: CAO Junqiu, LI Bo. Comparative study status on therapeutic effects of different treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2021, 28(5): 695-698. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.202008063 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Research progress of vitamin D in the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and its clinical transformation
  • Next Article

    同时性原发性双侧乳腺癌合并原发性肺癌1 例报道