• 1. The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. The Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
SHI Zhenghong, Email: shizhenghong20022002@yahoo.com.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objectives  To assess the efficacy and safety of cytidine diphosphate choline for patients with acute stroke.
Methods  Such databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP Database and Chinese Medical Association Journals were searched from the establishment to September of 2010, and the references of the included literatures were also searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cytidine diphosphate choline for patients with acute stroke. The data were extracted by two reviewers independently in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The quality of included trials was evaluated according to the Jadad scale standard. RevMan5.0 software was used for data analyses.
Results  Thirteen RCTs involving 2837 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that, there was no significant difference in the mortality or the rate of dependency at the end of follow-up (OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.36, P=0.75) between the cytidine diphosphate choline group and the placebo group. But the total effective rate of the cytidine diphosphate choline group was higher than that of the placebo group with a significant difference (OR=1.72, 95%CI 1.41 to 2.10, P lt;0.000 01). Five trials reported the incidence of adverse reaction of cytidine diphosphate choline treatment which showed the adverse reaction was mild; no severe adverse events (SAEs) were reported and the clinical application was safe.
Conclusion  The cytidine diphosphate choline is effective and safe for acute stroke. However, it is invalid to reduce the mortality and the rate of dependency at the end of three months’ follow-up.

Citation: LIU Li,SHI Zhenghong,YAN Qi,GUO Jia. Cytidine Diphosphate Choline for Acute Stroke: A Meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2011, 11(4): 404-412. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20110071 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Investigation on the Factors Related to Premature Ovarian Failure and Diminished Ovarian Reserve
  • Next Article

    Atraumatic Restorative Treatment versus Conventional Restorative Treatment for Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review