• 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces Logistical College Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin 300162, China;2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huizhou Traditional Chinese Hospital, Huizhou 516001, China;3. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;4. Department of Epidemiology, Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces Logistical College Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin 300162, China;
CHEN Yaqiong, Email: chenyq82@yahoo.com.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To systematically review the methodological quality of guidelines concerning infertility, so as to provide references for clinical practice.
Methods  Guidelines concerning infertility were electronically retrieved (from inception to Feb. 2013) in PubMed, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, GIN guideline database guideline development websites (including NGC, NICE, SIGN, NZGG, SOGC, etc.), and medical associtation websites (including IFFS, FIGO, ESHRE, NFOG, RCOG, ASRM, ACOG, etc.). We also searched Chinese guideline websites including the website of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of People’s Republic of China, CGC (China Guideline Clearinghouse), and CPGN (Clinical Practice Guideline Net). Two reviews independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of guideline development and reporting using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II).
Results  a) A total of 16 guidelines concerning infertility were included, with development time ranging from 1998 to 2012. Among 16 guidelines, 10 guidelines were made by the USA, 3 by Britan, 1 by the Europe, and 1 by America and Europe. b) The scores of guidelines according to the domains of AGREE II decreased from “Clarity of presentations, scope and purpose”, “Participants”, “Applicability”, “Rigour of development”, and “Editorial independence”. 16 guidelines were generally low in quality. The levels of recommendations were Level A (5 guidelines), Level B (8 guidelines), and Level C (3 guidelines). c) Four evidence-based guidelines scored the top three in the domain of “Rigour of development”. d) The recommendations of different guidelines were fairly the same. e) No guidelines on infertility have been developed in China.
Conclusion  a) The guidelines on infertility should be improved in “Rigour of development” and “Applicability” in future. Conficts of interest should be addressed. b) Guidelines are recommended to be developed on the basis of the methods of evidence-based medicine, and best evidence is recommended. c) National organizations such as ASRM should be established in China, so as to develop biomedicine and TCM guidelines based on evidence and regulate the treatment. d) For the general assessment of guidelines, AGREE II should offer threshold criteria of suggestion.

Citation: CUI Shichao,HOU Haiyan,LI Youping,CHEN Yaqiong,LAN Xiaoxia. Clinical Practice Guidelines on Infertility: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(8): 947-954. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20130166 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Observation of Therapeutic Effects of Musicokinetic Therapy on Perimenopausal Syndrome
  • Next Article

    Association between 14 bp Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism of HLA-G Gene and Preeclampsia: A Meta-Analysis