Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Quality of Working Life Scale (QWL7-32)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 ZHANGQin ¹ , CHENGChun-yan ¹ ,  LANYa-jia ²

1. Department of Graduate Studies, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Department of Occupational Health, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;

Corresponding author：

LANYa-jia, Email: lanyajia@sina.com

Keywords：

Quality of working life; Reliability; Validity

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20150203

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Quality of Working Life Scale (QWL7-32). Methods The QWL7-32 scale was used to survey 487 drilling workers. The presence of chronic diseases was regarded as an effector for evaluating physical health, and the result of SCL-90 measurement was regarded as an effector for evaluating psychological health. The reliability and validity of the scale were statistically analyzed. Results The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.713, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.920, and the Splithalf reliability coefficient was 0.942. The result of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the construct validity of scale was good, and the accumulative rate of 7 variances was 62.59%. The results of correlation analysis and t test showed that the validity of scale criterion was also good. In QWL7-32 scale, each dimension showed a good correlation with its relevant item but poor correlation with any other items. Conclusion The QWL7-32 has a good reliability and validity.

Citation： ZHANGQin, CHENGChun-yan, LANYa-jia. Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Quality of Working Life Scale (QWL7-32). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015, 15(10): 1231-1235. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20150203 Copy

1.	马宗国. 工作生命质量浅议. 工会论坛, 2004, 10(6):120-121.
2.	金泰廙. 职业卫生与职业医学. 第5版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2003:8-9.
3.	Raduan CR, Loo SB, Jegak U, et al. An analysis of quality of work life:implications of career dimension. Journal of Social Sciences, 2006, 2(2):61-67.
4.	张琴, 谢轶琼, 兰亚佳. 职业生命质量量表(QWL7-32)的研制. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2013, 44(6):957-961.
5.	林嗣豪, 唐文娟, 王治明, 等. 工作场所工效学负荷综合暴露评估方法的效度评价. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2008, 14(1):11-14.
6.	汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999.
7.	慢性疾病的分类. Available at:http://baike.baidu.com/view/266364.htm.
8.	Wright G. Investigative design and statistics. London:Penguin Book, 1986:45-67.
9.	Karasek RA. Job decision latitude, job demands and cardiovascular disease:a prospective study of Swedish men. JAPH, 1981, 71(7):694.
10.	侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用. 第1版. 北京:教育科学出版社, 2004:154-165.
11.	孙振球. 医学统计学. 第2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006.
12.	方积乾. 医学统计学与电脑实验. 第3版. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2006:440.

1. 马宗国. 工作生命质量浅议. 工会论坛, 2004, 10(6):120-121.
2. 金泰廙. 职业卫生与职业医学. 第5版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2003:8-9.
3. Raduan CR, Loo SB, Jegak U, et al. An analysis of quality of work life:implications of career dimension. Journal of Social Sciences, 2006, 2(2):61-67.
4. 张琴, 谢轶琼, 兰亚佳. 职业生命质量量表(QWL7-32)的研制. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2013, 44(6):957-961.
5. 林嗣豪, 唐文娟, 王治明, 等. 工作场所工效学负荷综合暴露评估方法的效度评价. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2008, 14(1):11-14.
6. 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999.
7. 慢性疾病的分类. Available at:http://baike.baidu.com/view/266364.htm.
8. Wright G. Investigative design and statistics. London:Penguin Book, 1986:45-67.
9. Karasek RA. Job decision latitude, job demands and cardiovascular disease:a prospective study of Swedish men. JAPH, 1981, 71(7):694.
10. 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用. 第1版. 北京:教育科学出版社, 2004:154-165.
11. 孙振球. 医学统计学. 第2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006.
12. 方积乾. 医学统计学与电脑实验. 第3版. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2006:440.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Quality of Working Life Scale (QWL7-32)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content