Progress of generation mechanisms of auditory steady-state response_Journal of Biomedical Engineering

Authors：

TAN Xiaodan ¹ , FU Qiuyang ² ,  WANG Tao ¹

1. School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, P.R.China;
2. Department of Otolaryngology, the Second People's Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510317, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

WANG Tao, Email: taowang@smu.edu.cn

Keywords：

auditory steady-state response; linear superposition hypothesis; neural entrainment hypothesis

DOI：

10.7507/1001-5515.201607015

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

The scalp-recorded auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is a periodically evoked potential in response to the stimulation with the acoustical property in the same period. The ASSR can be readily induced in comparison with transient responses for specific conditions. The clinical utility of ASSR may be unjustified for the ambiguity of the genesis. With the advance of relevant research, it is considered that the main generation hypotheses of the ASSR are conceived to be pertinent with the linear superposition or neural entrainment mechanism. Based on current findings and our contributions in this field, we introduce recent progresses of the two mechanisms with comments, and suggest the benefit of the rapid stimulation technology in this regard.

Citation： TAN Xiaodan, FU Qiuyang, WANG Tao. Progress of generation mechanisms of auditory steady-state response. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 34(3): 461-464. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201607015 Copy

1.	Mühler R, Mentzel K, Verhey J. Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns. Scientific World Journal, 2012, 2012: 192178.
2.	Seidel D U, Flemming T A, Park J J, et al. Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(1): 51-59.
3.	Chaieb L, Wilpert E C, Reber T P, et al. Auditory beat stimulation and its effects on cognition and mood States. Front Psychiatry, 2015, 6: 70.
4.	Galambos R. Makeig Stalmachoff P J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1981, 78(4): 2643-2647.
5.	Picton T W. Human auditory evoked potentials. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc, 2011.
6.	Zhang Li, Peng Weiwei, Zhang Zhiguo, et al. Distinct features of auditory steady-state responses as compared to transient event-related potentials. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e69164.
7.	莱昂斯. 数字信号处理. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2015.
8.	Presacco A, Bohórquez J, Yavuz E, et al. Auditory steady-state responses to 40-Hz click trains: Relationship to middle latency, gamma band and beta band responses studied with deconvolution. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2010, 121(9): 1540-1550.
9.	Bohórquez J, Özdamar O. Generation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) explained using convolution. Clin Neurophysiol, 2008, 119(11): 2598-2607.
10.	McNeer R R, Bohórquez J, Özdamar O. Influence of auditory stimulation rates on evoked potentials during general anesthesia relation between the transient auditory middle-latency response and the 40-Hz auditory steady state response. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(5): 1026-1035.
11.	Özdamar O, Toft-Nielsen J, Bohórquez J A. Relationship between transient and steady-state pattern electroretinograms: theoretical and experimental assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(12): 8560-8570.
12.	Capilla A, Pazo-Alvarez P, Darriba A, et al. Steady-state visual evoked potentials can be explained by temporal superposition of transient event-related responses. PLoS One, 2011, 6(1): e14543.
13.	Wang Tao, Huang Jianghua, Lin Lin, et al. Continuous-and discrete-time stimulus sequences for high stimulus rate paradigm in evoked potential studies. Comput Math Methods Med, 2013, 2013: 396034.
14.	Wang T, Zhan C, Yan G, et al. A preliminary investigation of the deconvolution of auditory evoked potentials using a session jittering paradigm. J Neural Eng, 2013, 10(2): 026023.
15.	朱程, 王涛, 黄江华, 等. 40 Hz 暂态听觉诱发电位中潜伏期成分的引出分析. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2013, 32(5): 539-545.
16.	林霖, 谭小丹, 王涛. 对 40 Hz 听觉稳态反应应用线性叠加条件的评估. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2016, 35(3): 278-283.
17.	Tan X D, Peng X, Zhan C A, et al. Comparison of auditory middle-latency responses from two deconvolution methods at 40 Hz. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2016, 63(6): 1157-1166.
18.	黄召辉, 林霖, 王涛. 最大长度序列诱发听性脑干反应的线性与非线性成分引出率和稳定性分析. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2016, 35(2): 148-154.
19.	Tan X D, Yu X F, Lin L, et al. Simulation on the comparison of steady-state responses synthesized by transient templates based on superposition hypothesis. Comput Math Methods Med, 2015, 2015: 476050.
20.	Lutkenhoner B, Patterson R D. Disruption of the auditory response to a regular click train by a single, extra click. Experimental Brain Research, 2015, 233(6): 1875-1892.
21.	Thut G, Schyns P, Gross J. Entrainment of perceptually relevant brain oscillations by non-invasive rhythmic stimulation of the human brain. Front Psychol, 2011, 2: 170.
22.	Ross B, Herdman A, Pantev C. Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. J Neurophysiol, 2005, 94(6): 4082-4093.
23.	Ross B, Jamali S, Miyazaki T, et al. Synchronization of beta and gamma oscillations in the somatosensory evoked neuromagnetic steady-state response. Exp Neurol, 2013, 245(SI): 40-51.
24.	Colon E, Legrain V, Mouraux A. Steady-state evoked potentials to study the processing of tactile and nociceptive somatosensory input in the human brain. Neurophysiol Clin, 2012, 42(5): 315-323.
25.	Zaehle T, Lenz D, Ohl F W, et al. Resonance phenomena in the human auditory cortex: individual resonance frequencies of the cerebral cortex determine electrophysiological responses. Exp Brain Res, 2010, 203(3): 629-635.
26.	Rass O, Forsyth J K, Krishnan G P, et al. Auditory steady state response in the schizophrenia, first-degree relatives, and schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophr Res, 2012, 136(1/3): 143-149.
27.	Sivarao D V. The 40-Hz auditory steady-state response: a selective biomarker for cortical NMDA function. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2015, 1344: 27-36.
28.	Ross B, Miyazaki T, Thompson J, et al. Human cortical responses to slow and fast binaural beats reveal multiple mechanisms of binaural hearing. J Neurophysiol, 2014, 112(8): 1871-1884.
29.	Becher A K, Hoehne M, Axmacher N, et al. Intracranial electroencephalography power and phase synchronization changes during monaural and binaural beat stimulation. Eur J Neurosci, 2015, 41(2): 254-263.

1. Mühler R, Mentzel K, Verhey J. Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns. Scientific World Journal, 2012, 2012: 192178.
2. Seidel D U, Flemming T A, Park J J, et al. Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(1): 51-59.
3. Chaieb L, Wilpert E C, Reber T P, et al. Auditory beat stimulation and its effects on cognition and mood States. Front Psychiatry, 2015, 6: 70.
4. Galambos R. Makeig Stalmachoff P J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1981, 78(4): 2643-2647.
5. Picton T W. Human auditory evoked potentials. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc, 2011.
6. Zhang Li, Peng Weiwei, Zhang Zhiguo, et al. Distinct features of auditory steady-state responses as compared to transient event-related potentials. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e69164.
7. 莱昂斯. 数字信号处理. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2015.
8. Presacco A, Bohórquez J, Yavuz E, et al. Auditory steady-state responses to 40-Hz click trains: Relationship to middle latency, gamma band and beta band responses studied with deconvolution. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2010, 121(9): 1540-1550.
9. Bohórquez J, Özdamar O. Generation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) explained using convolution. Clin Neurophysiol, 2008, 119(11): 2598-2607.
10. McNeer R R, Bohórquez J, Özdamar O. Influence of auditory stimulation rates on evoked potentials during general anesthesia relation between the transient auditory middle-latency response and the 40-Hz auditory steady state response. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(5): 1026-1035.
11. Özdamar O, Toft-Nielsen J, Bohórquez J A. Relationship between transient and steady-state pattern electroretinograms: theoretical and experimental assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(12): 8560-8570.
12. Capilla A, Pazo-Alvarez P, Darriba A, et al. Steady-state visual evoked potentials can be explained by temporal superposition of transient event-related responses. PLoS One, 2011, 6(1): e14543.
13. Wang Tao, Huang Jianghua, Lin Lin, et al. Continuous-and discrete-time stimulus sequences for high stimulus rate paradigm in evoked potential studies. Comput Math Methods Med, 2013, 2013: 396034.
14. Wang T, Zhan C, Yan G, et al. A preliminary investigation of the deconvolution of auditory evoked potentials using a session jittering paradigm. J Neural Eng, 2013, 10(2): 026023.
15. 朱程, 王涛, 黄江华, 等. 40 Hz 暂态听觉诱发电位中潜伏期成分的引出分析. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2013, 32(5): 539-545.
16. 林霖, 谭小丹, 王涛. 对 40 Hz 听觉稳态反应应用线性叠加条件的评估. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2016, 35(3): 278-283.
17. Tan X D, Peng X, Zhan C A, et al. Comparison of auditory middle-latency responses from two deconvolution methods at 40 Hz. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2016, 63(6): 1157-1166.
18. 黄召辉, 林霖, 王涛. 最大长度序列诱发听性脑干反应的线性与非线性成分引出率和稳定性分析. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2016, 35(2): 148-154.
19. Tan X D, Yu X F, Lin L, et al. Simulation on the comparison of steady-state responses synthesized by transient templates based on superposition hypothesis. Comput Math Methods Med, 2015, 2015: 476050.
20. Lutkenhoner B, Patterson R D. Disruption of the auditory response to a regular click train by a single, extra click. Experimental Brain Research, 2015, 233(6): 1875-1892.
21. Thut G, Schyns P, Gross J. Entrainment of perceptually relevant brain oscillations by non-invasive rhythmic stimulation of the human brain. Front Psychol, 2011, 2: 170.
22. Ross B, Herdman A, Pantev C. Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. J Neurophysiol, 2005, 94(6): 4082-4093.
23. Ross B, Jamali S, Miyazaki T, et al. Synchronization of beta and gamma oscillations in the somatosensory evoked neuromagnetic steady-state response. Exp Neurol, 2013, 245(SI): 40-51.
24. Colon E, Legrain V, Mouraux A. Steady-state evoked potentials to study the processing of tactile and nociceptive somatosensory input in the human brain. Neurophysiol Clin, 2012, 42(5): 315-323.
25. Zaehle T, Lenz D, Ohl F W, et al. Resonance phenomena in the human auditory cortex: individual resonance frequencies of the cerebral cortex determine electrophysiological responses. Exp Brain Res, 2010, 203(3): 629-635.
26. Rass O, Forsyth J K, Krishnan G P, et al. Auditory steady state response in the schizophrenia, first-degree relatives, and schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophr Res, 2012, 136(1/3): 143-149.
27. Sivarao D V. The 40-Hz auditory steady-state response: a selective biomarker for cortical NMDA function. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2015, 1344: 27-36.
28. Ross B, Miyazaki T, Thompson J, et al. Human cortical responses to slow and fast binaural beats reveal multiple mechanisms of binaural hearing. J Neurophysiol, 2014, 112(8): 1871-1884.
29. Becher A K, Hoehne M, Axmacher N, et al. Intracranial electroencephalography power and phase synchronization changes during monaural and binaural beat stimulation. Eur J Neurosci, 2015, 41(2): 254-263.

Journal of Biomedical Engineering

Progress of generation mechanisms of auditory steady-state response

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content