The application and prospects of three dimensional bioprinting in urinary system reconstruction_Journal of Biomedical Engineering

Authors：

GONG Lina ¹ , JIN Xi ¹ , LI Hong ^1,2 ,  WANG Kunjie ^1,2

1. Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R.China;
2. Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

three dimensional bioprinting; tissue engineering; urinary system reconstruction

DOI：

10.7507/1001-5515.201912016

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Three dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a new biological tissue engineering technology in recent years. The development of 3D bioprinting is conducive to solving the current problems of clinical tissue and organ repairing. This article provides a review about the clinical and research status of 3D bioprinting and urinary system reconstruction. Furthermore, the feasibility and clinical value of 3D bioprinting in urinary system reconstruction will be also discussed.

Citation： GONG Lina, JIN Xi, LI Hong, WANG Kunjie. The application and prospects of three dimensional bioprinting in urinary system reconstruction. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 37(2): 207-210. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201912016 Copy

1.	Zhang Y S, Yue K, Aleman J A, et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017, 45(1): 148-163.
2.	Culenova M, Bakos D, Ziaran S, et al. Bioengineered scaffolds as substitutes for grafts for urethra reconstruction. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(20): 3449.
3.	Angulo J C, Gómez R G, Nikolavsky D. Reconstruction of membranous urethral strictures. Curr Urol Rep, 2018, 19(6): 37.
4.	Fine R, Reda E F, Zelkovic P, et al. Tunneled buccal mucosa tube grafts for repair of proximal hypospadias. Journal of Urology, 2015, 193(5): 1813-1817.
5.	Li C L, Liao W B, Yang S X, et al. Urethral reconstruction using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-and smooth muscle cell-seeded bladder acellular matrix. Transplant Proc, 2013, 45(9): 3402-3407.
6.	Yang H, Chen B, Deng J, et al. Characterization of rabbit urine-derived stem cells for potential application in lower urinary tract tissue regeneration. Cell Tissue Res, 2018, 374(2): 303-315.
7.	Adamowicz J, Kuffel B, Van Breda S V, et al. Reconstructive urology and tissue engineering: converging developmental paths. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2019, 13(3): 522-533.
8.	Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min J K, et al. Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 10(2): 171-184.
9.	VeDepo M C, Buse E E, Paul A, et al. Non-physiologic bioreactor processing conditions for heart valve tissue engineering. Cardiovasc Eng Technol, 2019, 10(4): 628-637.
10.	Demirtaş T T, Irmak G, Gümüşderelioğlu M. A bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(3): 035003.
11.	Cho H, Gao Jieming, Kwon G S. PEG-b-PLA micelles and PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA sol-gels for drug delivery. J Control Release, 2016, 240: 191-201.
12.	Pal A, Pathak C, Synthesis V B. Characterization and application of biodegradable polymer grafted novel bioprosthetic tissue. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2018, 29(3): 217-235.
13.	Asiri A M, Marwani H M, Khan S B, et al. Greater cardiomyocyte density on aligned compared with random carbon nanofibers in polymer composites. Int J Nanomedicine, 2014, 9: 5533-5539.
14.	Kim E J, Yoon S J, Yeo G D, et al. Preparation of biodegradable PLA/PLGA membranes with PGA mesh and their application for periodontal guided tissue regeneration. Biomed Mater, 2009, 4(5): 055001.
15.	Abay A N, Gürel P G, Torun K G. Fibrous bone tissue engineering scaffolds prepared by wet spinning of PLGA. Turk J Biol, 2019, 43(4): 235-245.
16.	Rizzi M, Migliario M, Rocchetti V, et al. Epiregulin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles increase human keratinocytes proliferation: preliminary data. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 20(12): 2484-2490.
17.	Eberli D, Freitas F L, Atala A, et al. Composite scaffolds for the engineering of hollow organs and tissues. Methods, 2009, 47(2): 109-115.
18.	Xu F, Wang Y, Jiang X, et al. Effects of different biomaterials: comparing the bladder smooth muscle cells on waterborne polyurethane or poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid membranes. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2012, 28(1): 10-15.
19.	Waheed S, Cabot J M, Macdonald N P, et al. 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip, 2016, 16(11): 1993-2013.
20.	Lee H, Nguyen N H, Hwang S I, et al. Personalized 3D kidney model produced by rapid prototyping method and its usefulness in clinical applications. Int Braz J Urol, 2018, 44(5): 952-957.
21.	Hokmabad V R, Davaran S, Ramazani A, et al. Design and fabrication of porous biodegradable scaffolds: a strategy for tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2017, 28(16): 1797-1825.
22.	Ong C S, Yesantharao P, Huang Chenyu, et al. 3D bioprinting using stem cells. Pediatr Res, 2018, 83(1-2): 223-231.
23.	Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 2016, 34(4): 422-434.
24.	Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon C J. 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res, 2018, 173: 188-193.
25.	Hu X, Man Y, Li W, et al. 3D bio-printing of CS/Gel/HA/Gr hybrid osteochondral scaffolds. Polymers (Basel), 2019, 11(10): 1601.
26.	Biazar E, Najafi S M, Heidari K S, et al. 3D bio-printing technology for body tissues and organs regeneration. J Med Eng Technol, 2018, 42(3): 187-202.
27.	Hong N, Yang G H, Lee J, et al. 3D bioprinting and its in vivo applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2018, 106(1): 444-459.
28.	Zhang Q, Nguyen P D, Shi S, et al. 3D bio-printed scaffold-free nerve constructs with human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote rat facial nerve regeneration. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 6634.
29.	Jin Yipeng, Xu Yongde, Wu Yuanyi, et al. Corrigendum: microtissues enhance smooth muscle differentiation and cell viability of hADSCs for three dimensional bioprinting. Front Physiol, 2017, 8: 534.
30.	Habib A, Sathish V, Mallik S, et al. 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel. Materials (Basel), 2018, 11(3): 454.
31.	Zhou Yufeng. The application of ultrasound in 3D bio-printing. Molecules, 2016, 21(5): E590.
32.	Zhang X, Zhang Y. Tissue engineering applications of three-dimensional bioprinting. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2015, 72(3): 777-782.
33.	Osman N I, Hillary C, Bullock A J, et al. Tissue engineered buccal mucosa for urethroplasty: progress and future directions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2015, 82-83: 69-76.
34.	Gu Qi, Hao Jie, Lu Yangjie, et al. Three-dimensional bio-printing. Sci China Life Sci, 2015, 58(5): 411-419.
35.	Yeung E, Fukunishi T, Bai Yang, et al. Cardiac regeneration using human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived biomaterial-free 3D-bioprinted cardiac patch in vivo. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2019, 13(11): 2031-2039.
36.	Paul K, Darzi S, McPhee G, et al. 3D bioprinted endometrial stem cells on melt electrospun poly ε-caprolactone mesh for pelvic floor application promote anti-inflammatory responses in mice. Acta Biomater, 2019, 97: 162-176.

1. Zhang Y S, Yue K, Aleman J A, et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017, 45(1): 148-163.
2. Culenova M, Bakos D, Ziaran S, et al. Bioengineered scaffolds as substitutes for grafts for urethra reconstruction. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(20): 3449.
3. Angulo J C, Gómez R G, Nikolavsky D. Reconstruction of membranous urethral strictures. Curr Urol Rep, 2018, 19(6): 37.
4. Fine R, Reda E F, Zelkovic P, et al. Tunneled buccal mucosa tube grafts for repair of proximal hypospadias. Journal of Urology, 2015, 193(5): 1813-1817.
5. Li C L, Liao W B, Yang S X, et al. Urethral reconstruction using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-and smooth muscle cell-seeded bladder acellular matrix. Transplant Proc, 2013, 45(9): 3402-3407.
6. Yang H, Chen B, Deng J, et al. Characterization of rabbit urine-derived stem cells for potential application in lower urinary tract tissue regeneration. Cell Tissue Res, 2018, 374(2): 303-315.
7. Adamowicz J, Kuffel B, Van Breda S V, et al. Reconstructive urology and tissue engineering: converging developmental paths. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2019, 13(3): 522-533.
8. Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min J K, et al. Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 10(2): 171-184.
9. VeDepo M C, Buse E E, Paul A, et al. Non-physiologic bioreactor processing conditions for heart valve tissue engineering. Cardiovasc Eng Technol, 2019, 10(4): 628-637.
10. Demirtaş T T, Irmak G, Gümüşderelioğlu M. A bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(3): 035003.
11. Cho H, Gao Jieming, Kwon G S. PEG-b-PLA micelles and PLGA-b-PEG-b-PLGA sol-gels for drug delivery. J Control Release, 2016, 240: 191-201.
12. Pal A, Pathak C, Synthesis V B. Characterization and application of biodegradable polymer grafted novel bioprosthetic tissue. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2018, 29(3): 217-235.
13. Asiri A M, Marwani H M, Khan S B, et al. Greater cardiomyocyte density on aligned compared with random carbon nanofibers in polymer composites. Int J Nanomedicine, 2014, 9: 5533-5539.
14. Kim E J, Yoon S J, Yeo G D, et al. Preparation of biodegradable PLA/PLGA membranes with PGA mesh and their application for periodontal guided tissue regeneration. Biomed Mater, 2009, 4(5): 055001.
15. Abay A N, Gürel P G, Torun K G. Fibrous bone tissue engineering scaffolds prepared by wet spinning of PLGA. Turk J Biol, 2019, 43(4): 235-245.
16. Rizzi M, Migliario M, Rocchetti V, et al. Epiregulin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles increase human keratinocytes proliferation: preliminary data. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 20(12): 2484-2490.
17. Eberli D, Freitas F L, Atala A, et al. Composite scaffolds for the engineering of hollow organs and tissues. Methods, 2009, 47(2): 109-115.
18. Xu F, Wang Y, Jiang X, et al. Effects of different biomaterials: comparing the bladder smooth muscle cells on waterborne polyurethane or poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid membranes. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2012, 28(1): 10-15.
19. Waheed S, Cabot J M, Macdonald N P, et al. 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip, 2016, 16(11): 1993-2013.
20. Lee H, Nguyen N H, Hwang S I, et al. Personalized 3D kidney model produced by rapid prototyping method and its usefulness in clinical applications. Int Braz J Urol, 2018, 44(5): 952-957.
21. Hokmabad V R, Davaran S, Ramazani A, et al. Design and fabrication of porous biodegradable scaffolds: a strategy for tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2017, 28(16): 1797-1825.
22. Ong C S, Yesantharao P, Huang Chenyu, et al. 3D bioprinting using stem cells. Pediatr Res, 2018, 83(1-2): 223-231.
23. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 2016, 34(4): 422-434.
24. Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon C J. 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res, 2018, 173: 188-193.
25. Hu X, Man Y, Li W, et al. 3D bio-printing of CS/Gel/HA/Gr hybrid osteochondral scaffolds. Polymers (Basel), 2019, 11(10): 1601.
26. Biazar E, Najafi S M, Heidari K S, et al. 3D bio-printing technology for body tissues and organs regeneration. J Med Eng Technol, 2018, 42(3): 187-202.
27. Hong N, Yang G H, Lee J, et al. 3D bioprinting and its in vivo applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2018, 106(1): 444-459.
28. Zhang Q, Nguyen P D, Shi S, et al. 3D bio-printed scaffold-free nerve constructs with human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote rat facial nerve regeneration. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 6634.
29. Jin Yipeng, Xu Yongde, Wu Yuanyi, et al. Corrigendum: microtissues enhance smooth muscle differentiation and cell viability of hADSCs for three dimensional bioprinting. Front Physiol, 2017, 8: 534.
30. Habib A, Sathish V, Mallik S, et al. 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel. Materials (Basel), 2018, 11(3): 454.
31. Zhou Yufeng. The application of ultrasound in 3D bio-printing. Molecules, 2016, 21(5): E590.
32. Zhang X, Zhang Y. Tissue engineering applications of three-dimensional bioprinting. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2015, 72(3): 777-782.
33. Osman N I, Hillary C, Bullock A J, et al. Tissue engineered buccal mucosa for urethroplasty: progress and future directions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2015, 82-83: 69-76.
34. Gu Qi, Hao Jie, Lu Yangjie, et al. Three-dimensional bio-printing. Sci China Life Sci, 2015, 58(5): 411-419.
35. Yeung E, Fukunishi T, Bai Yang, et al. Cardiac regeneration using human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived biomaterial-free 3D-bioprinted cardiac patch in vivo. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2019, 13(11): 2031-2039.
36. Paul K, Darzi S, McPhee G, et al. 3D bioprinted endometrial stem cells on melt electrospun poly ε-caprolactone mesh for pelvic floor application promote anti-inflammatory responses in mice. Acta Biomater, 2019, 97: 162-176.

Previous Article
Advance in functional bladder engineering
Next Article
Application and progress of neuromodulation in lower urinary tract dysfunction

Journal of Biomedical Engineering

The application and prospects of three dimensional bioprinting in urinary system reconstruction

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content