目的 探讨修正创伤评分(RTS)、CRAMS评分及院前伤情评分(PHI)对于群体伤患者死亡的评估作用。 方法 回顾性分析2011年8月-2012年8月就诊且记录完整的45例群体伤患者的病历资料,根据病历记录计算RTS、CRAMS及PHI评分,并记录患者是否死亡。绘制受试者工作特征曲线并计算出曲线下面积;根据约登指数筛选出各个评分适宜的截断值,据此计算3种创伤评分的灵敏度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、阳性预测值、阴性预测值并进行比较。将患者按照性别、年龄分为亚组进行对比分析。 结果 RTS曲线下面积最大,且与参考线下面积对比差异有统计学意义(P=0.016),与另外两种评分比较其差异有统计学意义。 结论 RTS较CRAMS及PHI评分对于群体伤患者死亡预测具有更高的价值。
Citation: CHEN Xiaohong,HU Hai,CAO Yu.. Value of Three Trauma Scaling Systems in Predicting Death for Patients in Mass Casualties. West China Medical Journal, 2013, 28(9): 1329-1332. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.20130417 Copy
Copyright © the editorial department of West China Medical Journal of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved
-
Previous Article
Expert Consensus Statement on Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Bee Sting in Sichuan Poisoningand Resuscitation Study Group of Sichuan Emergency Medicine Committee -
Next Article
Consistency Analysis of JumpSTART Triage System and Injury Severity Score for Mass Casualties Including Children SHENGJie, HU Hai.