• 1. The Second Clinical Medical College, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P. R. China;
GONGFei, Email: gongfeimm@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Polypill on cardiovascular risk factors. Method Such databases as Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastracture, WanFang, and China Biology Medicine Disc were searched from their establishment to May 2015 for randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of Polypillon on cardiovascular risk factors. Meta-analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.2 software. Results Six studies were included which all came from overseas including 1 155 patients treated with Polypill and 1 149 treated with placebo or single or combined medicaiton. The meta-analysis showed that:when compared with the controls, Polypills could significantly reduce systolic blood pressure[WMD=-9.39 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), 95%CI (-14.44, -4.33) mm Hg, P=0.0003], diastolic blood pressure[WMD=-5.32 mm Hg, 95%CI (-8.10, -2.55) mm Hg, P=0.0002], total cholesterol[WMD=-1.11 mmol/L, 95%CI (-1.48, -0.74) mmol/L, P<0.00001], and low density lipoprotein[WMD=-0.91 mmol/L, 95%CI (-1.25, -0.57) mmol/L, P<0.00001]. However, those who took Polypill were easier to discontinue medication [OR=1.49, 95%CI (1.19, 1.87), P=0.0005]. In the respect of adverse effects, there was no significant difference between the two groups[OR=1.47, 95%CI (0.67, 3.25), P=0.34]. Conclusions The efficacy of Polypill on cardiovascular risk factors is obvious. Polypills can significantly reduce blood pressure and lipids. Tolerability is lower in those taking Polypills, but the difference is minor. There is no significant difference in the respect of adverse effects.

Citation: FANGDong, WANJing, FANGQi, LIKai-yong, CAOJian-lei, DINGSHILan-ying, GONGFei. The Efficacy and Safety of Polypill on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Meta-analysis. West China Medical Journal, 2015, 30(6): 1054-1059. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.20150303 Copy

  • Previous Article

    气管插管固定器在中毒洗胃中的应用
  • Next Article

    Clinical Efficacy Comparison between Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin on Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Premature Coronary Heart Disease