1. |
Seifert V, Stolke D. Multisegmental cervical spondylosis: treatment by spondylectomy, microsurgical decompression, and osteosynthesis. Neurosurgery, 1991, 29(4): 498-503.
|
2. |
Lian XF, Xu JG, Zeng BF, et al. Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(5): 713-719.
|
3. |
Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(3): 688-695.
|
4. |
Guo Q, Bi X, Ni B, et al. Outcomes of three anterior decompression and fusion techniques in the treatment of three-level cervical spondylosis. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(9): 1539-1544.
|
5. |
Konya D, Ozgen S, Gercek A, et al. Outcomes for combined anterior and posterior surgical approaches for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16(3): 404-409.
|
6. |
Li ZH, Huang JC, Zhang ZZ, et al. A comparison of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 2-year follow-up study: multilevel anterior cervical discectomy. Clin Spine Surg, 2017, 30(5): E540-E546.
|
7. |
Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X, et al. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21(3): 474-481.
|
8. |
Liu X, Wang H, Zhou Z, et al. Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. Orthopedics, 2014, 37(2): e117-e122.
|
9. |
Zhu B, Xu Y, Liu X, et al. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(7): 1583-1593.
|
10. |
Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, et al. Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(2): 362-372.
|
11. |
Heller JG, Raich AL, Dettori JR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of different types of cervical laminoplasty. Evid Based Spine Care J, 2013, 4(2): 105-115.
|
12. |
Wang S J, Jiang S D, Jiang L S, et al. Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(2): 185-194.
|
13. |
Okada M, Minamide A, Endo T, et al. A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or French-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(11): 1119-1126.
|
14. |
Wang L, Song Y, liu L, et al. Clinical outcomes of two different types of open-door laminoplasties for cervical compressive myelopathy: a prospective study. Neurol India, 2012, 60(2): 210-216.
|
15. |
Yue WM, Tan CT, Tan SB, et al. Results of cervical laminoplasty and a comparison between single and double trap-door techniques. J Spinal Disord, 2000, 13(4): 329-335.
|
16. |
Naito M, Ogata K, Kurose S, et al. Canal-expansive laminoplasty in 83 patients with cervical myelopathy. A comparative study of three different procedures. Int Orthop, 1994, 18(6): 347-351.
|
17. |
Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Yoshida M, et al. Neck muscle strength before and after cervical laminoplasty: relation to axial symptoms. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23(3):197-202.
|
18. |
Ohya J, Oshima Y, Takeshita K, et al. Patient satisfaction with double-door laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy. J Orthop Sci, 2015, 20(1): 64-70.
|
19. |
中国康复医学会颈椎病专业委员会. 颈椎病诊治与康复指南. 北京: 中国康复医学会, 2010: 1-22.
|