The Influence of Different Concentrations of Iodinated Contrast Agent on Image Quality of Galactography_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

 ZhaoJin ,  HuangLin , YuanYuan

Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

HuangLin, Email: hx_linhuang@sina.com

Keywords：

Digital mammography; Galactography; Concentration of non-ionic iodinated contrast agent

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.201600339

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To explore the influence of different concentrations of iodinated contrast agent on image quality of galactography. Methods Between June 2008 and October 2009, 50 non-pregnancy and non-lactation patients with mammary papilla discharge underwent breast galactography with digital mammography. All the patients' left breasts were in group L, and right breasts were in group R. The iohexol concentration of iopamidol injection was 370 mg/mL in group L and 300 mg/mL in group R. The image quality and the evaluation of average density of the two groups was analyzed and compared. Results The image quality score of group L and R was 2.8±0.2 (P>0.05). The mean density of main duct of breast axial view in two groups was (4 020.25±96.26) and (3 984.75±117.67) HU, respectively; the mean density of the lateral oblique view was (4 067.13±24.69) and (3 971.25±167.32) HU, respectively; the mean density of the lateral view was (4 058.88±52.07) and (4 034.75±67.54) HU, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion No obvious difference between the two concentrations of non-ionic iodinated contrast agents (300 and 370 mg/mL) in galactography diagnosis is found.

Citation： ZhaoJin, HuangLin, YuanYuan. The Influence of Different Concentrations of Iodinated Contrast Agent on Image Quality of Galactography. West China Medical Journal, 2016, 31(7): 1247-1250. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201600339 Copy

1.	张滨, 刘垚, 单中辉. 乳头溢液的诊断及临床意义[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2006, 29(26):8-9.
2.	马榕. 乳管造影在乳头溢液疾病诊治中的作用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2005, 25(2):75-76.
3.	刘春萍, 黄韬. 病理性乳头溢液的诊断进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2005, 13(3):186-188.
4.	陈韵岱, 陈纪言, 傅国胜, 等. 碘对比剂血管造影应用相关不良反应中国专家共识[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2014, 22(6):341-348.
5.	Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study:a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Circulation, 2007, 115(25):3189-3196.
6.	Chen Y, Hu S, Liu Y, et al. Renal tolerability of iopromide and iodixanol in 562 renally impaired patients undergoing cardiac catheterization:the DIRECT study[J]. Eur Intervention, 2012, 8(7):830-838.
7.	曾莉, 努尔别克, 李先军, 等. 乳腺导管造影技术在乳头溢液性疾病检查中的质量控制[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2009, 43(11):1219-1221.
8.	张黎峰, 茅群霞, 王献蜜, 等. 我国6省市育龄妇女乳腺疾病流行状况调查[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2014, 22(10):658-660, 665.
9.	Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, et al. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013, 132(5):1133-1145.
10.	张惠霞, 韩保卫, 黄永红. 乳腺导管造影的X线分析及临床应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2007, 23(9):1242-1244.
11.	黄永红, 周会行. 乳腺导管造影X线诊断498例分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2005, 14(6):260.
12.	陈少华, 方景华, 冯锦霞, 等. 选择性乳腺导管造影技术的质量控制[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2006, 22(12):1398-1399.
13.	孙蔚明, 杜晔. 非离子型造影剂致肾损害的临床分析[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2005, 13(4):284-287.
14.	Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105(19):2259-2264.
15.	许小曼. 非离子型造影剂对CT受检者血液流变学指标的影响[J]. 微循环学杂志, 2011, 21(1):28-29.
16.	Seeliger E, Flemming B, Wronski T, et al. Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 18(11):2912-2920.

1. 张滨, 刘垚, 单中辉. 乳头溢液的诊断及临床意义[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2006, 29(26):8-9.
2. 马榕. 乳管造影在乳头溢液疾病诊治中的作用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2005, 25(2):75-76.
3. 刘春萍, 黄韬. 病理性乳头溢液的诊断进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2005, 13(3):186-188.
4. 陈韵岱, 陈纪言, 傅国胜, 等. 碘对比剂血管造影应用相关不良反应中国专家共识[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2014, 22(6):341-348.
5. Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study:a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Circulation, 2007, 115(25):3189-3196.
6. Chen Y, Hu S, Liu Y, et al. Renal tolerability of iopromide and iodixanol in 562 renally impaired patients undergoing cardiac catheterization:the DIRECT study[J]. Eur Intervention, 2012, 8(7):830-838.
7. 曾莉, 努尔别克, 李先军, 等. 乳腺导管造影技术在乳头溢液性疾病检查中的质量控制[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2009, 43(11):1219-1221.
8. 张黎峰, 茅群霞, 王献蜜, 等. 我国6省市育龄妇女乳腺疾病流行状况调查[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2014, 22(10):658-660, 665.
9. Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, et al. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013, 132(5):1133-1145.
10. 张惠霞, 韩保卫, 黄永红. 乳腺导管造影的X线分析及临床应用[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2007, 23(9):1242-1244.
11. 黄永红, 周会行. 乳腺导管造影X线诊断498例分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2005, 14(6):260.
12. 陈少华, 方景华, 冯锦霞, 等. 选择性乳腺导管造影技术的质量控制[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2006, 22(12):1398-1399.
13. 孙蔚明, 杜晔. 非离子型造影剂致肾损害的临床分析[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2005, 13(4):284-287.
14. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105(19):2259-2264.
15. 许小曼. 非离子型造影剂对CT受检者血液流变学指标的影响[J]. 微循环学杂志, 2011, 21(1):28-29.
16. Seeliger E, Flemming B, Wronski T, et al. Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 18(11):2912-2920.

West China Medical Journal

The Influence of Different Concentrations of Iodinated Contrast Agent on Image Quality of Galactography

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content