• 1. Operation Room;Tangshan People's Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Anesthesiology;Tangshan People's Hospital Affiliated to North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P. R. China;
GanJianhui, Email: gjh71@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods. Methods Sixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy. Results The life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.

Citation: GaoHuijun, GanJianhui. Comparison of Application and Nursing between Continuous Hyperthermic Peritoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy and Intravenous Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients. West China Medical Journal, 2016, 31(9): 1589-1591. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201600434 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Study on the Effect of Orem's Self-care Model in School-age Children with Asthma
  • Next Article

    临床护理路径流程在食管癌围手术期的应用及效果观察