Objective  To investigate the value of ultrasound in diagnosing, treating and follow-up of patients with supraspinatus tendon injury. Methods  Between May 2014 and October 2015, ultrasound and MRI examinations were performed on 52 patients who were suspected to have supraspinatus tendon injury in the First People’s Hospital of Guangyuan. According to the conditions of the disease, patients underwent conservative or surgical treatment. The treatment results were compared with MRI and arthroscopic surgery. And regular ultrasound follow-up was performed at different recovery stages to observe the changes of the supraspinatus tendon, in order to provide corresponding basis for further clinical treatment. Results  Ultrasound results showed that 37 patients had supraspinatus tendon injury. Based on MRI results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and coincidence rate of the ultrasound examination were 85.0%, 75.0%, 91.9%, 60.0% and 82.7%, respectively. Of these 37 patients, 18 underwent conservative treatment, 7 underwent calcified mass mashing and aspiration treatment through needles under the guidance of ultrasonography, and 12 underwent arthroscopic surgery. Conclusions  Ultrasonography is accurate in diagnosing supraspinatus tendon injury, which can achieve bilateral comparison and real-time dynamic information of the patients. When it is necessary, it can also guide localization and puncture of local lesions. Furthermore, it is inexpensive and easy for treatment and follow-up.

Citation： XIAOJing. Clinical value of ultrasound in diagnosing, treating and follow-up of patients with supraspinatus tendon injury. West China Medical Journal, 2017, 32(1): 56-59. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201601008 Copy