• 1. Department of Ultrasonic Diagnosis, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Ultrasonography, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan 621000, P. R. China;
QIU Li, Email: wsqiuli@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To analyze the ultrasonic manifestations of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) in soft tissues.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the ultrasonic characteristics of 10 cases of soft tissue MLS which were pathologically confirmed between January and June 2006. Results  Ultrasonic manifestations: 8 cases occurred in muscles and 2 in subcutaneous tissues and muscles; the maximum mass diameter was (71.1±39.4) mm; 10 cases had clear border, 8 had regular shape, and 9 had posterior echo enhancement; 10 cases were all solid masses with mucous liquid zone (9 cases had mainly weak echo, among which 5 had strong echo areas; 1 case had mainly strong echo); bloodstream grade: 3 cases belonged to level 0, 3 level Ⅰ, 2 level Ⅱ, and 2 level Ⅲ. Pathologic findings: 2 cases had low differentiation; 1 case was a mixture of MLS and atypical lipoma with mainly strong ultrasonic echo; the rest 7 cases had middle or high differentiation.Conclusions Ultrasonic manifestations of soft tissue MLS are mostly large masses in the muscular layer with clear border, regular shape, posterior echo enhancement and mucous liquid zone. Various degrees of strong echo zone exist in the masses. Bloodstream and mucous liquid zone are correlated with differentiation degree, and ultrasonic manifestations can be influenced if other factors exist.

Citation: ZouXiaopan, XiangXi, QIULi. Comparison between ultrasonic manifestations and pathologic findings of soft tissue myxoid liposarcoma. West China Medical Journal, 2017, 32(2): 204-208. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201608288 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Investigation on depression in hospitalized patients in the Department of Oncology
  • Next Article

    Analysis on the influencing factors of hospitalization expenses in patients with uterine adenomyosis