The role of artificial intelligence robot in the development of vascular surgery technology_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

ZENG Guojun , WANG Jiarong ,  ZHAO Jichun

Department of Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

ZHAO Jichun, Email: zhaojc3@126.com

Keywords：

Artificial intelligence; Robot system; Minimally invasive surgery; Intracavitary treatment; Vascular surgery

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.201805113

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Artificial intelligence in robot system is mainly divided into two types: endoscopic robot system and intracavitary robot navigation system. The endoscopic robot system can effectively shorten the time of vascular anastomosis and occlusion during vascular bypass surgery, while the intracavitary robot navigation system has good localization and real-time observation function. Moreover, it has significant advantages in complex lesions and special anatomical locations. High cost and complicated equipment debugging are the main factors that limit the wide application of robot systems. Artificial intelligence represented by robot system has obvious advantages and broad prospects in the field of vascular surgery, but more research is needed to improve its shortcomings and to further clarify its standard operation and long-term results.

Citation： ZENG Guojun, WANG Jiarong, ZHAO Jichun. The role of artificial intelligence robot in the development of vascular surgery technology. West China Medical Journal, 2018, 33(6): 762-765. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201805113 Copy

1.	Martinez BD, Wiegand CS. Robotics in vascular surgery. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(4A Suppl): 57S-62S.
2.	Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(4A Suppl): 19S-26S.
3.	Challacombe BJ, Khan MS, Murphy D, et al. The history of robotics in urology. World J Urol, 2006, 24(2): 120-127.
4.	Da L, Zhang D, Wang T. Overview of the vascular interventional robot. Int J Med Robot, 2008, 4(4): 289-294.
5.	Mung JC, Huang SG, Moos JM, et al. Stereotactic endovascular aortic navigation with a novel ultrasonic-based three-dimensional localization system. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 57(6): 1637-1644.
6.	Mung J, Han S, Yen JT. Design and in vitro evaluation of a real-time catheter localization system using time of flight measurements from seven 3.5 MHz single element ultrasound transducers towards abdominal aortic aneurysm procedures. Ultrasonics, 2011, 51(6): 768-775.
7.	Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Sidhu R, et al. Advanced catheter technology: is this the answer to overcoming the long learning curve in complex endovascular procedures. J Endovasc Ther, 2011, 42(4): 531-538.
8.	Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Gruionu LG, et al. Three-dimensional endovascular navigation with electromagnetic tracking: ex vivo and in vivo accuracy. J Endovasc Ther, 2011, 18(2): 230-240.
9.	Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Rolls A, et al. Robot-assisted fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) using the Magellan system. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2013, 24(2): 191-196.
10.	Wisselink W, Cuesta MA, Gracia C, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a report of two cases. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36(5): 1079-1082.
11.	Stádler P. Role of the robot in totally laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease. Acta Chir Belg, 2009, 109(3): 300-305.
12.	Stádler P, Dvorácek L, Vitásek P, et al. Is robotic surgery appropriate for vascular procedures? Report of 100 aortoiliac cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 36(4): 401-404.
13.	Diks J, Nio D, Jongkind V, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta: the early learning curve. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(10): 1760-1763.
14.	Stádler P, Matous P, Vitásek P, et al. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(5): 915-919.
15.	Nio D, Diks J, Linsen MA, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: early clinical experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2005, 29(6): 586-590.
16.	Desgranges P, Bourriez A, Javerliat I, et al. Robotically assisted aorto-femoral bypass grafting: lessons learned from our initial experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004, 27(5): 507-511.
17.	Kolvenbach R, Schwierz E, Wasilljew S, et al. Total laparoscopically and robotically assisted aortic aneurysm surgery: a critical evaluation. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39(4): 771-776.
18.	Killewich LA, Cindrick-Pounds LL, Gomez G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease-a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2004, 38(1): 83-87.
19.	Judith C Lin SA, Menon M, et al. Robotic-assisted aortic surgery with and without minilaparotomy for complicated occlusive disease and aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2012(55): 16-23.
20.	Luke P, Knudsen BE, Nguan CY, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic renal artery aneurysm reconstruction. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(3): 651-653.
21.	Pietrabissa A, Morelli L, Ferrari M, et al. Mixed reality for robotic treatment of a splenic artery aneurysm. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(5): 1204.
22.	Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, et al. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(2): 255.e19-255.e21.
23.	Wahlgren CM, Skelly C, Shalhav A, et al. Hybrid laparorobotic debranching and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg, 2008, 22(2): 285-289.
24.	Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, et al. Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(9): 1376-1382.
25.	Jongkind V, Diks J, Yeung KK, et al. Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vascular, 2011, 19(1): 1-7.
26.	Finlay A, Johnson M, Forbes TL. Surgically relevant aortic arch mapping using computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg, 2012, 26(4): 483-490.
27.	Riga CV, Cheshire NJ, Hamady MS, et al. The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(4): 810-819; discussion 819-820.
28.	Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Hamady MS, et al. Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54(3): 799-809.

1. Martinez BD, Wiegand CS. Robotics in vascular surgery. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(4A Suppl): 57S-62S.
2. Hanly EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(4A Suppl): 19S-26S.
3. Challacombe BJ, Khan MS, Murphy D, et al. The history of robotics in urology. World J Urol, 2006, 24(2): 120-127.
4. Da L, Zhang D, Wang T. Overview of the vascular interventional robot. Int J Med Robot, 2008, 4(4): 289-294.
5. Mung JC, Huang SG, Moos JM, et al. Stereotactic endovascular aortic navigation with a novel ultrasonic-based three-dimensional localization system. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 57(6): 1637-1644.
6. Mung J, Han S, Yen JT. Design and in vitro evaluation of a real-time catheter localization system using time of flight measurements from seven 3.5 MHz single element ultrasound transducers towards abdominal aortic aneurysm procedures. Ultrasonics, 2011, 51(6): 768-775.
7. Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Sidhu R, et al. Advanced catheter technology: is this the answer to overcoming the long learning curve in complex endovascular procedures. J Endovasc Ther, 2011, 42(4): 531-538.
8. Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Gruionu LG, et al. Three-dimensional endovascular navigation with electromagnetic tracking: ex vivo and in vivo accuracy. J Endovasc Ther, 2011, 18(2): 230-240.
9. Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Rolls A, et al. Robot-assisted fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) using the Magellan system. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2013, 24(2): 191-196.
10. Wisselink W, Cuesta MA, Gracia C, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a report of two cases. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36(5): 1079-1082.
11. Stádler P. Role of the robot in totally laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease. Acta Chir Belg, 2009, 109(3): 300-305.
12. Stádler P, Dvorácek L, Vitásek P, et al. Is robotic surgery appropriate for vascular procedures? Report of 100 aortoiliac cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 36(4): 401-404.
13. Diks J, Nio D, Jongkind V, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta: the early learning curve. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(10): 1760-1763.
14. Stádler P, Matous P, Vitásek P, et al. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(5): 915-919.
15. Nio D, Diks J, Linsen MA, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease: early clinical experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2005, 29(6): 586-590.
16. Desgranges P, Bourriez A, Javerliat I, et al. Robotically assisted aorto-femoral bypass grafting: lessons learned from our initial experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004, 27(5): 507-511.
17. Kolvenbach R, Schwierz E, Wasilljew S, et al. Total laparoscopically and robotically assisted aortic aneurysm surgery: a critical evaluation. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 39(4): 771-776.
18. Killewich LA, Cindrick-Pounds LL, Gomez G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease-a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2004, 38(1): 83-87.
19. Judith C Lin SA, Menon M, et al. Robotic-assisted aortic surgery with and without minilaparotomy for complicated occlusive disease and aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2012(55): 16-23.
20. Luke P, Knudsen BE, Nguan CY, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic renal artery aneurysm reconstruction. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(3): 651-653.
21. Pietrabissa A, Morelli L, Ferrari M, et al. Mixed reality for robotic treatment of a splenic artery aneurysm. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(5): 1204.
22. Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, et al. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(2): 255.e19-255.e21.
23. Wahlgren CM, Skelly C, Shalhav A, et al. Hybrid laparorobotic debranching and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg, 2008, 22(2): 285-289.
24. Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, et al. Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(9): 1376-1382.
25. Jongkind V, Diks J, Yeung KK, et al. Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vascular, 2011, 19(1): 1-7.
26. Finlay A, Johnson M, Forbes TL. Surgically relevant aortic arch mapping using computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg, 2012, 26(4): 483-490.
27. Riga CV, Cheshire NJ, Hamady MS, et al. The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(4): 810-819; discussion 819-820.
28. Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Hamady MS, et al. Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54(3): 799-809.

Previous Article
A review of clinical trial registration and its application in neurology
Next Article
误诊为多发性硬化及胶质瘤的原发性中枢系统血管炎一例

West China Medical Journal

The role of artificial intelligence robot in the development of vascular surgery technology

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content