1. |
Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(18): 1696-1704.
|
2. |
Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2015, 385(9986): 2477-2484.
|
3. |
Stachon P, Kaier K, Heidt T, et al. Nationwide outcomes of aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation in Germany 2008-2015. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2020, 95(4): 810-816.
|
4. |
Goel SS, Ige M, Tuzcu EM, et al. Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease-implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(1): 1-10.
|
5. |
Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic- valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(18): 1695-1705.
|
6. |
Braghiroli J, Kapoor K, Thielhelm TP, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low risk patients: a review of PARTNER 3 and Evolut low risk trials. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2020, 10(1): 59-71.
|
7. |
Ochiai T, Chakravarty T, Yoon SH, et al. Coronary access after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2020, 13(6): 693-705.
|
8. |
Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2007, 133(5): 1226-1233.
|
9. |
Kocka V, Theriault-Lauzier P, Xiong TY, et al. Optimal fluoroscopic projections of coronary ostia and bifurcations defined by computed tomographic coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2020, 13(21): 2560-2570.
|
10. |
Sheng Y, Yu J, Jing Q, et al. Determination of optimal fluoroscopic angulations for left main coronary artery ostial interventions: 3-dimensional computed tomography validation. J Interv Cardiol, 2022, 2022: 2411824.
|
11. |
Fuchs A, Kofoed KF, Yoon SH, et al. Commissural alignment of bioprosthetic aortic valve and native aortic valve following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on valvular function and coronary filling. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(17): 1733-1743.
|
12. |
Kim WK, Pellegrini C, Ludwig S, et al. Feasibility of coronary access in patients with acute coronary syndrome and previous TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 14(14): 1578-1590.
|
13. |
Yudi MB, Sharma SK, Tang GHL, et al. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(12): 1360-1378.
|
14. |
Tang GHL, Zaid S, Fuchs A, et al. Alignment of transcatheter aortic-valve neo-commissures (ALIGN TAVR): impact on final valve orientation and coronary artery overlap. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2020, 13(9): 1030-1042.
|
15. |
Bieliauskas G, Wong I, Bajoras V, et al. Patient-specific implantation technique to obtain neo-commissural alignment with self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 14(19): 2097-2108.
|
16. |
Tang GHL, Zaid S, Michev I, et al. “Cusp-Overlap” view simplifies fluoroscopy-guided implantation of self-expanding valve in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(16): 1663-1665.
|
17. |
Ben-Shoshan J, Alosaimi H, Lauzier PT, et al. Double s-curve versus cusp-overlap technique: defining the optimal fluoroscopic projection for tavr with a self-expanding device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 14(2): 185-194.
|
18. |
王斌, 徐凯, 荆全民, 等. 计算机断层扫描指导经皮主动脉瓣膜置换术导丝过瓣可行性研究. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(10): 1149-1152.
|
19. |
Wang X, De Backer O, Bieliauskas G, et al. Cusp symmetry and coronary ostial eccentricity and its impact on coronary access following TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15(2): 123-134.
|
20. |
Marwan M, Achenbach S. Role of cardiac CT before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Curr Cardiol Rep, 2016, 18(2): 21.
|