• 1. Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300150, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Integrated Management, the First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300073, P. R. China;
HUANG Yuhong, Email: hyh101@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To conduct a scoping review on the clinical research evidence for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with traditional Chinese medicine, identify relevant problems in the literature, and provide ideas for the follow-up research. Methods  PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Digital Journal Full-text Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database were searched from inception to July 21st, 2022. The clinical research evidence for the treatment of COVID-19 with traditional Chinese medicine was included, the data information was sorted out, and the results were descriptively analyzed. Results  A total of 132 studies were included, including 53 randomized controlled trials, 17 non-randomized controlled trials, and 62 retrospective cohort studies, all of which were published between 2020 and 2022. The clinical studies were carried out in 19 provincial level regions, among which Hubei province had the largest number of studies (49.2%, 65/132). The sample sizes of the studies were mostly between 50 and 100 cases (43.2%, 57/132). Most of the studies had a treatment course of 0-14 days (50.0%, 66/132). The most compared intervention measures were traditional Chinese medicine + conventional western medicine treatment vs. conventional western medicine treatment, accounting for 75.0% (99/132) of the studies. The COVID-19 patients included in the studies were mainly mild and moderate. Outcome indicators included changes in symptoms/signs, laboratory indicators, CT indicators, clinical outcomes, safety indicators, functional scales, etc. The main adverse reactions/events in intervention/exposure groups were gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusions  There has been a lot of clinical research evidence on the treatment of COVID-19 by traditional Chinese medicine. To provide strong evidence support for the treatment of COVID-19 by traditional Chinese medicine, more clinical trials with large samples and international collaboration are needed in the future.

Citation: SUN Yanjun, ZHANG Ludan, LI Nan, GAO Shengwei, ZHANG Li, XING Yongfa, MU Wei, GU Xufang, WANG Baohe, HUANG Yuhong. A scoping review of clinical research evidence for traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019. West China Medical Journal, 2023, 38(4): 506-512. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202211154 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Analysis of clinical features of Tropheryma whipplei pneumonia
  • Next Article

    Efficacy and safety of high-dose amoxicillin combined with esomeprazole dual therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection