TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN YOUNG PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

LIYang ,  LIZijian , ZHANGKe

Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

LIZijian, Email: lizijian76@hotmail.com

Keywords：

Total knee arthroplasty; Young patient; Survival rate of prosthesis; Satisfaction

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.20140152

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To review the current situation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) used in young patients with osteoarthritis. Methods The recent literature in the treatment of osteoarthritis with TKA in young patients was extensively reviewed. The characteristics, curative effect, and postoperative satisfaction degree of TKA in young patients were analyzed and summarized. Results Young patients have longer life expectancy and higher activity, which may lead to much higher expectation of the TKA. Comparing with elderly patients, young patients obtain equal or better effectiveness after TKA, but they are likely to not be satisfied with the effects because of low survival rate of the prosthesis. At present, continuous development of implant design, prosthesis material, and operation technique are in progress to reduce wear, hence to prolong the implant survivorship so as to meet the desire of young patients. However, the studies of the big samples and long-term follow-up are required to confirm the clinical advantages of such developments. Conclusion With the trend of TKA in young patients, surgeons should have a good understanding of the patients' demands, select suitable prosthesis and give appropriate preoperative counseling to build up an objective expectation of curative effect, which will lead to a better doctor-patient relationship.

Citation： LIYang, LIZijian, ZHANGKe. TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN YOUNG PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2014, 28(6): 687-692. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20140152 Copy

1.	Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, et al. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty:results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years' followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (428):12-25.
2.	Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, et al. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, (464):27-31.
3.	Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, et al. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(9):907-918.
4.	McCalden RW, Robert CE, Howard JL, et al. Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(8 Suppl):83-86.
5.	Lavernia CJ, Alcerro JC, Rossi MD. Fear in arthroplasty surgery:the role of race. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(2):547-554.
6.	Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2007, 89(4):780-785.
7.	Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen WS, et al. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969-2008. Mayo Clin Proc, 2010, 85(10):898-904.
8.	Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1):45-51.
9.	Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement:national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(10):2606-2012.
10.	Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, et al. What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?:a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(2):574-583.
11.	Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, et al. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85-A(2):259-265.
12.	Himanen AK, Belt E, Nevalainen J, et al. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8, 467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta Orthop, 2005, 76(1):85-88.
13.	Lonner JH, Hershman S, Mont M, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years of age and younger with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, (380):85-90.
14.	Lombardi AV Jr, Nunley RM, Berend KR, et al. Do patients return to work after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 472(1):138-146.
15.	Woolf K, Reese CE, Mason MP, et al. Physical activity is associated with risk factors for chronic disease across adult women's life cycle. J Am Diet Assoc, 2008, 108(6):948-959.
16.	Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM. How active are patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?:A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(7):1891-1904.
17.	Solomon E, Rees T, Ukoumunne OC, et al. Personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in adults living in rural south-west England:a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2013, 10:129.
18.	Bonnin M, Laurent JR, Parratte S, et al. Can patients really do sport after TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(7):853-862.
19.	Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty:are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop, 2009, 80(1):55-61.
20.	Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, et al. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1997, 79(4):575-582.
21.	Zeni JA Jr, Snyder-Mackler L. Preoperative predictors of persistent impairments during stair ascent and descent after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2010, 92(5):1130-1136.
22.	Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, et al. Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc, 1999, 74(10):978-982.
23.	Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, et al. Evaluation of patient concerns before total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(4):442-445.
24.	Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, et al. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med, 2001, 161(3):454-460.
25.	Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, et al. Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2012, 94(10):866-873.
26.	Mont MA, Sayeed SA, Osuji O, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years and younger. J Knee Surg, 2012, 25(1):65-69.
27.	Keenan AC, Wood AM, Arthur CA, et al. Ten-year survival of cemented total knee replacement in patients aged less than 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94(7):928-931.
28.	Williams DP, Price AJ, Beard DJ, et al. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(1):38-44.
29.	Crowder AR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(7 Suppl 3):12-16.
30.	Duffy GP, Crowder AR, Trousdale RR, et al. Cemented total knee arthroplasty using a modern prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty, 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):67-70.
31.	Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, et al. Total knee arthroplasty effectiveness in patients 55 years old and younger:osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid arthritis. Knee, 2007, 14(1):9-11.
32.	Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five-to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2006, 88(9):1158-1163.
33.	Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Quality of life:patients and doctors don't always agree:a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 2004, 57(7):653-661.
34.	Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. The John Insall Award:Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, (452):35-43.
35.	Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2007, 89(7):893-900.
36.	Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty:a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16(6):740-747.
37.	Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, et al. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement:a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2010, 92(9):1253-1258.
38.	Parvizi J, Nunley RM, Berend KR, et al. High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):133-137.
39.	Meijerink HJ, Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, et al. Surgeon's expectations do not predict the outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009, 129(10):1361-1365.
40.	Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty:who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1):57-63.
41.	Bonnin MP, Basiglini L, Archbold HA. What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(9):1411-1417.
42.	Emejuaiwe N, Jones AC, Ibrahim SA, et al. Disparities in joint replacement utilization:a quality of care issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2007, 25(6 Suppl 47):44-49.
43.	Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (404):7-13.
44.	Odland AN, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, et al. Wear and lysis is the problem in modular TKA in the young OA patient at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(1):41-47.
45.	Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A. Staged bilateral mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients:a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(3):237-243.
46.	Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, et al. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient:short-term results. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(1):35-39.
47.	Wonglertsiri S, Uthaicharatratsame C. Comparison of fixed bearing and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty using identical femoral component. J Med Assoc Thai, 2013, 96(2):203-208.
48.	van der Voort P, Pijls BG, Nouta KA, et al. A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(9):1209-1216.
49.	Ferguson KB, Bailey O, Anthony I, et al. A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design-outcomes at two year follow-up. Knee, 2014, 1(1):151-155.
50.	Breeman S, Campbell MK, Dakin H, et al. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(4):486-492.
51.	Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Lee GC, et al. Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 116 months. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(12):e83.
52.	Tienboon P, Jaruwangsanti N, Laohasinnurak P. A prospective study comparing mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing type in total knee arthroplasty using the free-hand-cutting technique. J Med Assoc Thai, 2012, 95 Suppl 10:S77-86.
53.	Zeng Y, Shen B, Yang J, et al. Is there reduced polyethylene wear and longer survival when using a mobile-bearing design in total knee replacement? A meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(8):1057-1063.
54.	Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Steklov N, et al. Wear of polyethylene against oxidized zirconium femoral components effect of aggressive kinematic conditions and malalignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(1):116-1121.
55.	Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Colwell CW Jr, et al. Oxidized zirconium femoral components reduce polyethylene wear in a knee wear simulator. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (428):120-124.
56.	Good V, Ries M, Barrack RL, et al. Reduced wear with oxidized zirconium femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85-A Suppl 4:105-110.
57.	Spector BM, Ries MD, Bourne RB, et al. Wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on oxidized zirconium total knee femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2001, 83-A Suppl 2 Pt 2:80-86.
58.	Hui C, Salmon L, Maeno S, et al. Five-year comparison of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in total knee arthroplasty:a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(7):624-630.
59.	Hofer JK, Ezzet KA. A minimum 5-year follow-up of an oxidized zirconium femoral prosthesis used for total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2014, 21(1):168-171.
60.	Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Comparison of the Genesis II total knee replacement with oxidised zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in the same patients:a prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94(9):1221-1227.
61.	Minoda Y, Aihara M, Sakawa A, et al. Comparison between highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2009, 16(5):348-351.
62.	Hodrick JT, Severson EP, McAlister DS, et al. Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(11):2806-2812.
63.	Collier JP, Sperling DK, Currier JH, et al. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee. J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11(4):377-389.
64.	Sutula LC, Collier JP, Saum KA, et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, (319):28-40.
65.	Oral E, Wannomae KK, Hawkins N, et al. Alpha-tocopherol-doped irradiated UHMWPE for high fatigue resistance and low wear. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(24):5515-5522.
66.	Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, et al. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene doped with vitamin E. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(4):580-591.
67.	Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty:a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am, 2009, 40(4):479-489, viii.
68.	Tasker A, Hassaballa M, Murray J, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2year follow up. Knee, 2014, 21(1):189-193.
69.	Schnurr C, Csecsei G, Eysel P, et al. The effect of computer navigation on blood loss and transfusion rate in TKA. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(7):474.
70.	Kowalski MA, Górecki A. Total knee arthroplasty using the OrthoPilot computer-assisted surgical navigation system. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2004, 6(4):456-460.
71.	Thiengwittayaporn S, Kanjanapiboonwong A, Junsee D. Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res, 2013, 8:37.
72.	Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2007, 89(2):261-269.
73.	Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Ishida K, et al. Long-term subjective outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(10):1911-1915.
74.	Wegrzy J, Parratte S, Coleman-Wood K, et al. The John Insall award:no benefit of minimally invasive TKA on gait and strength outcomes:a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(1):46-55.
75.	Pietsch M, Djahani O, Zweiger CH, et al. Custom-fit minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty:effect on blood loss and early clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10):2234-2240.
76.	Bonicoli E, Andreani L, Parchi P, et al. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty:our initial experience with 30 knees. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013.[Epub ahead of print].
77.	Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty:our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(6):1149-1154.
78.	Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, et al. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement:intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(6):1571-1575.
79.	Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, et al. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(9):857-863.

1. Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, et al. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty:results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years' followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (428):12-25.
2. Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, et al. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, (464):27-31.
3. Chesworth BM, Mahomed NN, Bourne RB, et al. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61(9):907-918.
4. McCalden RW, Robert CE, Howard JL, et al. Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(8 Suppl):83-86.
5. Lavernia CJ, Alcerro JC, Rossi MD. Fear in arthroplasty surgery:the role of race. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(2):547-554.
6. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2007, 89(4):780-785.
7. Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen WS, et al. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969-2008. Mayo Clin Proc, 2010, 85(10):898-904.
8. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1):45-51.
9. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement:national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(10):2606-2012.
10. Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, et al. What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?:a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(2):574-583.
11. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, et al. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85-A(2):259-265.
12. Himanen AK, Belt E, Nevalainen J, et al. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8, 467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta Orthop, 2005, 76(1):85-88.
13. Lonner JH, Hershman S, Mont M, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years of age and younger with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, (380):85-90.
14. Lombardi AV Jr, Nunley RM, Berend KR, et al. Do patients return to work after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 472(1):138-146.
15. Woolf K, Reese CE, Mason MP, et al. Physical activity is associated with risk factors for chronic disease across adult women's life cycle. J Am Diet Assoc, 2008, 108(6):948-959.
16. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM. How active are patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?:A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(7):1891-1904.
17. Solomon E, Rees T, Ukoumunne OC, et al. Personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in adults living in rural south-west England:a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2013, 10:129.
18. Bonnin M, Laurent JR, Parratte S, et al. Can patients really do sport after TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(7):853-862.
19. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty:are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop, 2009, 80(1):55-61.
20. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, et al. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1997, 79(4):575-582.
21. Zeni JA Jr, Snyder-Mackler L. Preoperative predictors of persistent impairments during stair ascent and descent after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2010, 92(5):1130-1136.
22. Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, et al. Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc, 1999, 74(10):978-982.
23. Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, et al. Evaluation of patient concerns before total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(4):442-445.
24. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, et al. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med, 2001, 161(3):454-460.
25. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, et al. Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2012, 94(10):866-873.
26. Mont MA, Sayeed SA, Osuji O, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 40 years and younger. J Knee Surg, 2012, 25(1):65-69.
27. Keenan AC, Wood AM, Arthur CA, et al. Ten-year survival of cemented total knee replacement in patients aged less than 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94(7):928-931.
28. Williams DP, Price AJ, Beard DJ, et al. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(1):38-44.
29. Crowder AR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(7 Suppl 3):12-16.
30. Duffy GP, Crowder AR, Trousdale RR, et al. Cemented total knee arthroplasty using a modern prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty, 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):67-70.
31. Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, et al. Total knee arthroplasty effectiveness in patients 55 years old and younger:osteoarthritis vs. rheumatoid arthritis. Knee, 2007, 14(1):9-11.
32. Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five-to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2006, 88(9):1158-1163.
33. Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Quality of life:patients and doctors don't always agree:a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 2004, 57(7):653-661.
34. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, et al. The John Insall Award:Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, (452):35-43.
35. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2007, 89(7):893-900.
36. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty:a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16(6):740-747.
37. Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, et al. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement:a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2010, 92(9):1253-1258.
38. Parvizi J, Nunley RM, Berend KR, et al. High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):133-137.
39. Meijerink HJ, Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, et al. Surgeon's expectations do not predict the outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009, 129(10):1361-1365.
40. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty:who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1):57-63.
41. Bonnin MP, Basiglini L, Archbold HA. What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(9):1411-1417.
42. Emejuaiwe N, Jones AC, Ibrahim SA, et al. Disparities in joint replacement utilization:a quality of care issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2007, 25(6 Suppl 47):44-49.
43. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (404):7-13.
44. Odland AN, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, et al. Wear and lysis is the problem in modular TKA in the young OA patient at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(1):41-47.
45. Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A. Staged bilateral mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients:a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(3):237-243.
46. Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, et al. Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient:short-term results. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(1):35-39.
47. Wonglertsiri S, Uthaicharatratsame C. Comparison of fixed bearing and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty using identical femoral component. J Med Assoc Thai, 2013, 96(2):203-208.
48. van der Voort P, Pijls BG, Nouta KA, et al. A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(9):1209-1216.
49. Ferguson KB, Bailey O, Anthony I, et al. A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design-outcomes at two year follow-up. Knee, 2014, 1(1):151-155.
50. Breeman S, Campbell MK, Dakin H, et al. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(4):486-492.
51. Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Lee GC, et al. Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 116 months. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(12):e83.
52. Tienboon P, Jaruwangsanti N, Laohasinnurak P. A prospective study comparing mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing type in total knee arthroplasty using the free-hand-cutting technique. J Med Assoc Thai, 2012, 95 Suppl 10:S77-86.
53. Zeng Y, Shen B, Yang J, et al. Is there reduced polyethylene wear and longer survival when using a mobile-bearing design in total knee replacement? A meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(8):1057-1063.
54. Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Steklov N, et al. Wear of polyethylene against oxidized zirconium femoral components effect of aggressive kinematic conditions and malalignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(1):116-1121.
55. Ezzet KA, Hermida JC, Colwell CW Jr, et al. Oxidized zirconium femoral components reduce polyethylene wear in a knee wear simulator. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (428):120-124.
56. Good V, Ries M, Barrack RL, et al. Reduced wear with oxidized zirconium femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85-A Suppl 4:105-110.
57. Spector BM, Ries MD, Bourne RB, et al. Wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on oxidized zirconium total knee femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2001, 83-A Suppl 2 Pt 2:80-86.
58. Hui C, Salmon L, Maeno S, et al. Five-year comparison of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in total knee arthroplasty:a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(7):624-630.
59. Hofer JK, Ezzet KA. A minimum 5-year follow-up of an oxidized zirconium femoral prosthesis used for total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2014, 21(1):168-171.
60. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Comparison of the Genesis II total knee replacement with oxidised zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in the same patients:a prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94(9):1221-1227.
61. Minoda Y, Aihara M, Sakawa A, et al. Comparison between highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2009, 16(5):348-351.
62. Hodrick JT, Severson EP, McAlister DS, et al. Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(11):2806-2812.
63. Collier JP, Sperling DK, Currier JH, et al. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee. J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11(4):377-389.
64. Sutula LC, Collier JP, Saum KA, et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, (319):28-40.
65. Oral E, Wannomae KK, Hawkins N, et al. Alpha-tocopherol-doped irradiated UHMWPE for high fatigue resistance and low wear. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(24):5515-5522.
66. Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, et al. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene doped with vitamin E. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(4):580-591.
67. Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty:a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am, 2009, 40(4):479-489, viii.
68. Tasker A, Hassaballa M, Murray J, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2year follow up. Knee, 2014, 21(1):189-193.
69. Schnurr C, Csecsei G, Eysel P, et al. The effect of computer navigation on blood loss and transfusion rate in TKA. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(7):474.
70. Kowalski MA, Górecki A. Total knee arthroplasty using the OrthoPilot computer-assisted surgical navigation system. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2004, 6(4):456-460.
71. Thiengwittayaporn S, Kanjanapiboonwong A, Junsee D. Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res, 2013, 8:37.
72. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2007, 89(2):261-269.
73. Nakano N, Matsumoto T, Ishida K, et al. Long-term subjective outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(10):1911-1915.
74. Wegrzy J, Parratte S, Coleman-Wood K, et al. The John Insall award:no benefit of minimally invasive TKA on gait and strength outcomes:a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(1):46-55.
75. Pietsch M, Djahani O, Zweiger CH, et al. Custom-fit minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty:effect on blood loss and early clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10):2234-2240.
76. Bonicoli E, Andreani L, Parchi P, et al. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty:our initial experience with 30 knees. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013.[Epub ahead of print].
77. Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty:our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(6):1149-1154.
78. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, et al. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement:intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(6):1571-1575.
79. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, et al. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(9):857-863.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN YOUNG PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content