• 1. Department of Spinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine University, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P. R. China;
  • 2. the First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine University;
LIANGDe, Email: spinedr2011@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To investigate the classification and treatment strategies of symptomatic severe osteoporotic vertebral fracture and collapse. Methods Between August 2010 and January 2014, 42 patients with symptomatic severe osteoporotic vertebral fracture and collapse were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to clinical symptom and imaging materials, 23 cases were classified as type I (local pain, limitation of motion, no neurological symptom, and no obvious deformity), 12 cases as type II (slight neurological symptom and kyphotic Cobb angle ≤ 30°), and 7 cases as type III (severe neurological symptom and kyphotic Cobb angle <30°). In 23 type I patients, 17 underwent percutaneous vertebral augmentation, 6 underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation strengthened with bone cement combined with percutaneous vertebral augmentation. In 12 type II patients, they were treated with local spinal decompression and internal fixation strengthened with bone cement. In 7 type III patients, 5 underwent posterior osteotomy, and 2 underwent one stage posterior approach of vertebral resection and reconstruction. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and local kyphotic Cobb angle were used to evaluate the neurological function. The complications were recorded. Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients. Wound infection and ketoacidosis secondary to stress blood glucose rise occurred in 1 case of type III patients respectively, and were cured after corresponding treatment; primary healing of wound was obtained in the other patients. The patients were followed up from 6 to 36 months (mean, 11.6 months). The nerve function was improved in 17 cases, and micturition disability was observed in 2 cases. Asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in 13 cases (30.95%) (7 cases in type I, 4 cases in type II, and 2 cases in type III). No bone cement dislocation and internal fixation failure were found during follow-up. The VAS score, ODI, and the local kyphotic Cobb angle at 1 week and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at 1 week and last follow-up (P>0.05). Conclusion In order to improve the effectiveness and reduce the risk and complications of operation, individualized strategies should be performed according to different types of severe osteoporotic vertebral fracture and collapse.

Citation: ZHANGShuncong, MOLing, LIANGDe, JIANGXiaobing, YANGZhidong, TANGYongchao, JINDaxiang, YAOZhensong, GUODanqing, FENGPengbo. CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES OF SYMP TOMATIC SEVERE OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL FRACTURE AND COLLAPSE. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2016, 30(2): 189-196. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160039 Copy

  • Previous Article

    COMBINED POSTERIOR AND ANTERIOR APPROACHES FOR RESECTION OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINAL HUGE DUMBBELL-SHAPED TUMOR
  • Next Article

    EFFECT OF BODY MASS INDEX ON OUTCOME OF POSTERIOR 360° FUSION FOR SINGLE-LEVEL LUM BAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASES