APPLICATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN KNEE ARTHROPLASTY_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

YANXiangjia ,  LIYanlin , XIAOYu , LILongteng

Department of Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan, 650032, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

LIYanlin, Email: 852387873@qq.com

Keywords：

Three-dimensional digital technology; Knee arthroplasty; Knee morphology; Finite element analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.20160265

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To review the recent progress in the application of three-dimensional digital technology in knee arthroplasty. Methods The relevant literature at home and abroad about the three-dimensional digital technology in the applications of knee arthroplasty in recent years was extensively reviewed. Results The three-dimensional digital technology can obtain arthroplasty knee morphology and biomechanics, and can estimate preoperative planning osteotomy and the sizes of prostheses, so it can guide knee arthroplasty precisely. Conclusion Three-dimensional digital technology can reduce the operation error, improve the operation precision, and improve the effectiveness in knee arthroplasty.

Citation： YAN Xiangjia, LI Yanlin, XIAO Yu, LI Longteng. APPLICATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2016, 30(10): 1306-1310. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160265 Copy

1.	Pierce TP, Cherian JJ, Mont MA. Static and dynamic bracing for loss of motion following total knee arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2015, 25(4):337-343.
2.	Malkani AL, Hitt KD, Badarudeen S, et al. The difficult porimary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect, 2016, 65:243-268.
3.	Hommel H, Perka C. Gap-balancing technique combined with patient-specific instrumentation in TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(11):1603-1608.
4.	van Kempen RW, Schimmel JJ, van Hellemondt GG, et al. Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome:prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(7):2296-2302.
5.	Maas A, Kim TK, Miehlke RK, et al. Differences in anatomy and kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA patients:influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014:612838.
6.	Koh IJ, Cho WS, Choi NY, et al. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years:a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):316-326.
7.	Iorio R, Della Valle CJ, Healy WL, et al. Stratification of standardized TKA complications and adverse events:a brief communication. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):194-205.
8.	Schotanus MG, Pilot P, Kaptein BL, et al. No difference in terms of radiostereometric analysis between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty:a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
9.	Weber O, Goost H, Mueller M, et al. Mid-term results after post-traumatic knee joint replacement in elderly patients. Z Orthop Unfall, 2011, 149(2):166-172.
10.	Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system:application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(5):620-628.
11.	Ferrara F, Cipriani A, Magarelli N, et al. Implant positioning in TKA:Comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(4):e271-280.
12.	许鹏, 李彦林, 陈文栋, 等. MRI影像下股骨髁间窝三维数字化解剖学数据与实体解剖测量值的差异. 中国组织工程研究, 2011, 15(43):8006-8009.
13.	黄赞, 李彦林, 胡猛, 等. 基于MRI和CT二维图像重建膝关节三维数字化模型的股骨髁扭转角差异性研究. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2015, 29(2):167-170.
14.	Kuwano T, Urabe K, Miura H, et al. Importance of the lateral anatomic tibial slope as a guide to the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients. J Orthop Sci, 2005, 10(1):42-47.
15.	Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee, 2009, 16(5):341-347.
16.	Liu T, Wang C, Xiao J, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction method for measuring the knee valgus angle of the femur in northern Chinese adults. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2014, 15(8):720-726.
17.	Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, et al. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(1):124-130.
18.	Murakami T, Murray K. Outcomes of knee disarticulation and the influence of surgical techniques in dysvascular patients:A systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2016, 40(4):423-435.
19.	König A, Kirschner S. Long-term results in total knee arthroplasty. Der Orthopade, 2003, 32(6):516-526.
20.	Hamilton WG, Sritulanondha S, Engh CA Jr. Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA:a focused review. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(9):e500-503.
21.	Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ, et al. Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty, 1997, 12(3):281-290.
22.	Chen F, Krackow KA. Management of tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, (305):249-257.
23.	Chatterji U, Ashworth MJ, Smith AL, et al. Retrieval study of tibial baseplate fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(1):101-107.
24.	姬林松, 李彦林, 黄赞, 等. 不同型号膝关节固定平台假体匹配的三维有限元生物力学分析. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(2):222-225.
25.	姬林松, 李彦林, 黄赞, 等. 三维有限元模拟伸直状态下不同软骨缺损面积对膝关节应力的影响. 中国运动医学杂志, 2015, 34(11):1048-1053.
26.	Stoner K, Jerabek SA, Tow S, et al. Rotating-platform has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(1):76-85.
27.	Otto JK, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD. Mobility and contact mechanics of a rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (392):24-37.
28.	Otto JK, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD. Gait cycle finite element comparison of rotating-platform total knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (410):181-188.
29.	Greenwald AS, Heim CS. Mobile-bearing knee systems:ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear and design issues. Instr Course Lect, 2005, 54:195-205.
30.	Sawatari T, Tsumura H, Iesaka K, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-the influence of tibial component inclination. J Orthop Res, 2005, 23(3):549-554.
31.	Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Why are total knee arthroplastics failing today. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (404):7-13.
32.	Jerosch J, Peker E, Philipps B, et al. Interindividal reprodcibility in perioperative rotational alignement of femoral components in knee prosthetic srgery sing the transepicondlar axis. Knee Surg Sports Tramatol Arthrosc, 2002, 10(3):194-197.
33.	Hsu AR, Kim JD, Bhatia S, et al. Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(2):e179-183.
34.	Citak M, Kendoff D, O'Loughlin PF, et al. Estimation of pretraumatic femoral antetorsion in bilateral femoral shaft fractures. Skeletal Radiol, 2009, 38(12):1183-1187.
35.	Suero EM, Hufner T, Stubig T, et al. Use of a virtual 3D software for planning of tibial plateau fracture reconstruction. Injury, 2010, 41(6):589-591.
36.	Sewell MD, Hanna SA, AI-Khateeb H, et al. Custom rotating-hinge primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with skeletal dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94(3):339-343.
37.	Minns RJ, Bibb R, Banks R, et al. The use of a reconstructed three-dimensional solid model from CT to aid the surgical management of a total knee arthroplasty:a case study. Med Eng Phys, 2003, 25(6):523-526.
38.	Amiri S, Wilson DR, Anglin C, et al. Isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm imaging of component alignments in total knee arthroplasty with potential intraoperative and postoperative applications. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(2):248-254.
39.	Geiger F, Parsch D. Intraoperative assessment of femoral component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(3):267-270.
40.	Ettinger M, Claassen L, Paes P, et al. 2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2016, 23(1):149-151.

1. Pierce TP, Cherian JJ, Mont MA. Static and dynamic bracing for loss of motion following total knee arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2015, 25(4):337-343.
2. Malkani AL, Hitt KD, Badarudeen S, et al. The difficult porimary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect, 2016, 65:243-268.
3. Hommel H, Perka C. Gap-balancing technique combined with patient-specific instrumentation in TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(11):1603-1608.
4. van Kempen RW, Schimmel JJ, van Hellemondt GG, et al. Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome:prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(7):2296-2302.
5. Maas A, Kim TK, Miehlke RK, et al. Differences in anatomy and kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA patients:influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014:612838.
6. Koh IJ, Cho WS, Choi NY, et al. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years:a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):316-326.
7. Iorio R, Della Valle CJ, Healy WL, et al. Stratification of standardized TKA complications and adverse events:a brief communication. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):194-205.
8. Schotanus MG, Pilot P, Kaptein BL, et al. No difference in terms of radiostereometric analysis between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty:a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
9. Weber O, Goost H, Mueller M, et al. Mid-term results after post-traumatic knee joint replacement in elderly patients. Z Orthop Unfall, 2011, 149(2):166-172.
10. Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system:application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(5):620-628.
11. Ferrara F, Cipriani A, Magarelli N, et al. Implant positioning in TKA:Comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(4):e271-280.
12. 许鹏, 李彦林, 陈文栋, 等. MRI影像下股骨髁间窝三维数字化解剖学数据与实体解剖测量值的差异. 中国组织工程研究, 2011, 15(43):8006-8009.
13. 黄赞, 李彦林, 胡猛, 等. 基于MRI和CT二维图像重建膝关节三维数字化模型的股骨髁扭转角差异性研究. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2015, 29(2):167-170.
14. Kuwano T, Urabe K, Miura H, et al. Importance of the lateral anatomic tibial slope as a guide to the tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients. J Orthop Sci, 2005, 10(1):42-47.
15. Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee, 2009, 16(5):341-347.
16. Liu T, Wang C, Xiao J, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction method for measuring the knee valgus angle of the femur in northern Chinese adults. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2014, 15(8):720-726.
17. Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, et al. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(1):124-130.
18. Murakami T, Murray K. Outcomes of knee disarticulation and the influence of surgical techniques in dysvascular patients:A systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2016, 40(4):423-435.
19. König A, Kirschner S. Long-term results in total knee arthroplasty. Der Orthopade, 2003, 32(6):516-526.
20. Hamilton WG, Sritulanondha S, Engh CA Jr. Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA:a focused review. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(9):e500-503.
21. Blunn GW, Joshi AB, Minns RJ, et al. Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty, 1997, 12(3):281-290.
22. Chen F, Krackow KA. Management of tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, (305):249-257.
23. Chatterji U, Ashworth MJ, Smith AL, et al. Retrieval study of tibial baseplate fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(1):101-107.
24. 姬林松, 李彦林, 黄赞, 等. 不同型号膝关节固定平台假体匹配的三维有限元生物力学分析. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(2):222-225.
25. 姬林松, 李彦林, 黄赞, 等. 三维有限元模拟伸直状态下不同软骨缺损面积对膝关节应力的影响. 中国运动医学杂志, 2015, 34(11):1048-1053.
26. Stoner K, Jerabek SA, Tow S, et al. Rotating-platform has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(1):76-85.
27. Otto JK, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD. Mobility and contact mechanics of a rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (392):24-37.
28. Otto JK, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD. Gait cycle finite element comparison of rotating-platform total knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (410):181-188.
29. Greenwald AS, Heim CS. Mobile-bearing knee systems:ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear and design issues. Instr Course Lect, 2005, 54:195-205.
30. Sawatari T, Tsumura H, Iesaka K, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-the influence of tibial component inclination. J Orthop Res, 2005, 23(3):549-554.
31. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Why are total knee arthroplastics failing today. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (404):7-13.
32. Jerosch J, Peker E, Philipps B, et al. Interindividal reprodcibility in perioperative rotational alignement of femoral components in knee prosthetic srgery sing the transepicondlar axis. Knee Surg Sports Tramatol Arthrosc, 2002, 10(3):194-197.
33. Hsu AR, Kim JD, Bhatia S, et al. Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(2):e179-183.
34. Citak M, Kendoff D, O'Loughlin PF, et al. Estimation of pretraumatic femoral antetorsion in bilateral femoral shaft fractures. Skeletal Radiol, 2009, 38(12):1183-1187.
35. Suero EM, Hufner T, Stubig T, et al. Use of a virtual 3D software for planning of tibial plateau fracture reconstruction. Injury, 2010, 41(6):589-591.
36. Sewell MD, Hanna SA, AI-Khateeb H, et al. Custom rotating-hinge primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with skeletal dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2012, 94(3):339-343.
37. Minns RJ, Bibb R, Banks R, et al. The use of a reconstructed three-dimensional solid model from CT to aid the surgical management of a total knee arthroplasty:a case study. Med Eng Phys, 2003, 25(6):523-526.
38. Amiri S, Wilson DR, Anglin C, et al. Isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm imaging of component alignments in total knee arthroplasty with potential intraoperative and postoperative applications. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(2):248-254.
39. Geiger F, Parsch D. Intraoperative assessment of femoral component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(3):267-270.
40. Ettinger M, Claassen L, Paes P, et al. 2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2016, 23(1):149-151.

Previous Article
RESEARCH PROGRESS OF INTERSPINOUS DISTRACTION DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
Next Article
ADVANCES IN NERVE RECONSTRUCTION OF OBSTETRIC BRACHIAL PLEXUS PALSY

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

APPLICATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content