1. |
Colizza WA, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1995, 77(11): 1713-1720.
|
2. |
张国宁, 王友. 膝关节评分标准的评估. 中华外科杂志, 2006, 44(16): 1141-1143.
|
3. |
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1976, 58(6): 754-765.
|
4. |
Scuderi GR, Clarke HD. Cemented posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(4 Suppl 1): 17-21.
|
5. |
Buechel FF. Low contact stress meniscal bearing knee replacement: design concepts, failure mechanisms and long-term survivorship//Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, eds. Current concepts in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 47.
|
6. |
Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, et al. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, (286): 94-102.
|
7. |
Groh GL, Parker J, Elliott J, et al. Results of total knee arthroplasty using the posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis. A report of 137 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991, (269): 58-62.
|
8. |
Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, et al. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (388): 41-50.
|
9. |
Bhan S, Malhotra R, Krishna EK, et al. A comparison of fixed bearing and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2005, 87(10): 2290-2296.
|
10. |
Kim YH, Kim JS. Comparison of anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86-A(6): 1239-1247.
|
11. |
Thompson NW, Wilson DS, Cran GW, et al. Dislocation of the rotating platform after low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (425): 207-211.
|
12. |
Kwak JY, Jeong JH, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with the LCS rotating platform mobile bearing knee system and the PFC sigma RP-F mobile bearing knee system. Clin Orthop Surg, 2012, 4(4): 256-262.
|
13. |
Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, et al. Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(3): 286-294.
|
14. |
Most E, Li G, Schule S, et al. The kinematics of fixed and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (416): 197-207.
|
15. |
Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. The New Jersey Low-Contact-Stress Knee Replacement System: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1986, 105(4): 197-204.
|
16. |
Kuster MS, Horz S, Ing D, et al. The effects of load and conformity in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, (375): 302-312.
|
17. |
Kelly NH, Fu RH, Wright TM, et al. Wear Damage in Mobile-bearing TKA is as Severe as That in Fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(1): 123-130.
|
18. |
Stoner K, Jerabek SA, Tow S, et al. Rotating-platform has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(1): 76-85.
|
19. |
Lu YC, Huang CH, Chang TK, et al. Wear-pattern analysis in retrieved tibial inserts of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2010, 92(4): 500-507.
|
20. |
Chouteau J, Lerat JL, Testa R, et al. Mobile-bearing insert translational and rotational kinematics in a PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2009, 95(4): 254-259.
|
21. |
Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, et al. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (428): 221-227.
|
22. |
Wasielewski RC, Komistek RD, Zingde SM, et al. Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(11): 2662-2668.
|