1. |
Vaishya R, Vijay V, Demesugh DM, et al. Surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2016, 7(2): 71-79.
|
2. |
Hofmann AA, PIaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991, (269): 70-77.
|
3. |
Hasegawa M, Miyazaki S, Yamaguchi T, et al. Comparison of midterm outcomes of minimally invasive computer-assisted vs minimally invasive jig-based total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(1): 43-46.
|
4. |
Verburg H, Mathijssen NM, Niesten DD, et al. Comparison of mini-midvastus and conventional total knee arthroplasty with clinical and radiographic evaluation: A prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2016, 98(12): 1014-1022.
|
5. |
Yoo JH, Park SH, Han CD, et al. Radiologic outcomes according to varus deformity in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty. Yonsei Med J, 2016, 57(1): 225-231.
|
6. |
Layher F, Zipfel M, Sander K, et al. Functional comparison of the outcome after midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall, 2016, 154(1): 50-57.
|
7. |
Huang AB, Wang HJ, Yu JK, et al. Are there any clinical and radiographic differences between quadriceps-sparing and mini-medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty after a minimum 5 years of follow-up? Chin Med J (Engl), 2015, 128(14): 1898-1904.
|
8. |
曾建伟, 沈彬, 杨静, 等. 微创切口与传统切口对全膝关节置换术后切口外侧皮肤感觉障碍影响的对比研究. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2015, 20(1): 1-6.
|
9. |
Unwin O, Hassaballa M, Murray J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total knee replacement; medium term results with minimum five year follow-up. Knee, 2017, 24(2): 454-459.
|
10. |
Huang AB, Wang HJ, Yu JK, et al. Optimal patellar alignment with minimally invasive approaches in total knee arthroplasty after a minimum five year follow-up. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(3): 487-492.
|
11. |
Teng Y, Du W, Jiang J, et al. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: meta-analysis. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(12): e1722-1731.
|
12. |
Whiteside LA. Mini incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(4 Suppl 1): 16-18.
|
13. |
Cuckler JM. The ugly underbelly of the MIS movement: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty, 2007, 22(4 Suppl 1): 99-101.
|
14. |
van Hemert WL, Senden R, Grimm B, et al. Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(6): 943-951.
|
15. |
Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, et al. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005, (440): 82-87.
|
16. |
Koh IJ, Kim MW, Kim MS, et al. The Patient's perception does not differ following subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: A simultaneous bilateral randomized study. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(1): 112-117.
|
17. |
Shah NA, Jain NP. Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees using minimally invasive medial-subvastus approach. Indian J Orthop, 2016, 50(1): 25-33.
|
18. |
Yuan FZ, Wang SJ, Zhou ZX, et al. Malalignment and malposition of quadriceps-sparing approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1): 129.
|
19. |
Flören M, Reichel H, Davis J, et al. The mini-incision mid-vastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2008, 20(6): 534-543.
|
20. |
Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Ulrich SD, et al. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2010, 92(3): 575-585.
|