ZHANG Haiping , HAO Dingjun , HE Baorong , ZHAO Qinpeng , WANG Xiaodong , LIU Tuanjiang , HE Simin
  • Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an Shaanxi, 710054, P.R.China;
HAO Dingjun, Email: haodingjundr@163.com
Lumbar Cage; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; spondylolisthesis
10.7507/1002-1892.201806125
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 161 patients with single segment L4 or L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis treated between January 2013 and December 2015. According to the implantation of Cage, they were divided into trial group (85 cases, modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage implanted in TLIF) and control group (76 cases, traditional nondirection-changeable Cage implanted in TLIF). There was no significant difference in the general data of gender, age, disease duration, slippage segment, and slippage grade between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative implantation time of Cage, Cage position adjustments times, fluoroscopy times during implantation of Cage, fluoroscopy exposure time, and total operation time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the patients before operation, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and the incidence of complications was recorded and analyzed. CT examinations were performed at 6 and 12 months after operation, and lumbar fusion was evaluated by Bridwell criteria.Results The intraoperative implantation time of Cage, Cage position adjustments times, fluoroscopy times during implantation of Cage, fluoroscopy exposure time, and total operation time in trial group were significant less than those in control group (P<0.05). All the 161 patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.3 months). There was 1 case of dural sac tear in the trial group and 1 case of superficial infection in the control group; no complication such as dural tear and infection occurred in other patients. The fusion rate was 76.5% (64/85) in the trial group and 57.9% (44/76) in the control group at 6 months after operation, showing significant difference (χ2=6.44, P=0.02); at 12 months after operation, the fusion rate was 96.5% (82/85) in the trial group and 90.8% (69/76) in the control group (including 3 cases of Cage displacement and 4 cases of screw breakage), showing no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups (χ2=1.54, P=0.26). The VAS and ODI scores of the two groups decreased gradually at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and improved significantly when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05).Conclusion Both Cages can obtain the similar effectiveness. The modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage can significantly reduce the fluoroscopy times and radiation dose during TLIF, shorten the operation time, and effectively reduce the radiation exposure of patients and medical staff.

Citation： ZHANG Haiping, HAO Dingjun, HE Baorong, ZHAO Qinpeng, WANG Xiaodong, LIU Tuanjiang, HE Simin. Application of modified direction-changeable lumbar Cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2019, 33(4): 410-415. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201806125 Copy