Development and clinical application of ankle prosthesis_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

 BU Pengfei , LI Chuan , LI Jun , ZHU Min

Department of Orthopedics, the 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese PLA, Kunming Yunnan, 650100, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

BU Pengfei, Email: 390531644@qq.com

Keywords：

Ankle prosthesis; ankle replacement; biomechanics

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.201902014

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To review the development and clinical application of ankle prosthesis.Methods The recent literature on ankle prosthesis design and clinical application was reviewed and analyzed. Results Compared with the hip and knee prostheses, the ankle prosthesis develops slowly and has been developed to the third generation. The ankle joint has a special structure of multi-axis movement. The design of the first and second generations of prostheses is not conformed to the biomechanics of the ankle. The third generation of prosthesis is more conform to the characteristics of ankle biomechanics, with high postoperative survival rate and satisfactory clinical outcome. Conclusion At present, the survival rate of ankle prosthesis is low, and there is still much room for improvement in biomechanics, materials, and other aspects.

Citation： BU Pengfei, LI Chuan, LI Jun, ZHU Min. Development and clinical application of ankle prosthesis. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2019, 33(11): 1370-1373. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201902014 Copy

1.	Maffulli N, Via AG, Oliva F. Chronic Achilles tendon disorders: tendinopathy and chronic rupture. Clin Sports Med, 2015, 34(4): 607-624.
2.	Saxena A, Via AG, Maffulli N, et al. Subtalar arthroereisis implant removal in adults: a prospective study of 100 patients. Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(3): 500-503.
3.	Eleftheriou KI, Rosenfeld PF. Lisfranc injury in the athlete: evidence supporting management from sprain to fracture dislocation. Foot Ankle Clin, 2013, 18(2): 219-236.
4.	Dalmau-Pastor M, Yasui Y, Calder JD, et al. Anatomy of the inferior extensor retinaculum and its role in lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(4): 957-962.
5.	Inman VT. The joints of the ankle. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1976: 117.
6.	Golanó P, Vega J. Ankle sprain: Diagnosis and therapy starts with knowledge of anatomy. Aspetar Sports Med J, 2013, 2(2): 234-242.
7.	Precerutti M, Bonardi M, Ferrozzi G, et al. Sonographic anatomy of the ankle. J Ultrasound, 2014, 17(2): 79-87.
8.	Koller JR, Remy CD, Ferris DP. Biomechanics and energetics of walking in powered ankle exoskeletons using myoelectric control versus mechanically intrinsic control. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2018, 15(1): 42.
9.	Pangrazzi GJ, Baker EA, Shaheen PJ, et al. Single-surgeon experience and complications of a fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int, 2018, 39(1): 46-58.
10.	Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1996, 78(11): 1658-1664.
11.	Newton SE 3rd. Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1982, 64(1): 104-111.
12.	Demottaz JD, Mazur JM, Thomas WH, et al. Clinical study of total ankle replacement with gait analysis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1979, 61(7): 976-988.
13.	Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL, Ilstrup DM, et al. Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1994, 76: 974-979.
14.	Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K, et al. Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, (252): 209-216.
15.	Kofoed H. Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (424): 73-79.
16.	Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2003, 85(3): 334-341.
17.	Kerkhoff YR, Kosse NM, Metsaars WP, et al. Long-term functional and radiographic outcome of a mobile bearing ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int, 2016, 37(12): 1292-1302.
18.	Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E. STAR^TM ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int, 2011, 32(5): S473-S484.
19.	Devries JG, Berlet GC, Lee TH, et al. Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE. Foot Ankle Spec, 2011, 4(4): 235-244.
20.	Schuberth JM, Christensen JC, Rialson JA. Metal-reinforced cement augmentation for complex talar subsidence in failed total ankle arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2011, 50(6): 766-772.
21.	Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, et al. Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: Part 1: Rang of motion. Foot Ankle Int, 2003, 24(12): 881-887.
22.	Hintermann B, Zwicky L, Knupp M, et al. HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(13): 1166-1174.
23.	Hintermann B, Barg A, Knupp M, et al. Conversion of painful ankle arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2009, 91(4): 850-858.
24.	Maffulli N, Longo UG, Locher J, et al. Outcome of ankle arthrodesis and ankle prosthesis: a review of the current status. Br Med Bull, 2017, 124(1): 91-112.
25.	Stavrakis AI, SooHoo NF. Trends in complication rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2016, 98(17): 1453-1458.
26.	Hayes BJ, Gonzalez T, Smith JT, et al. Ankle arthritis: you can′t always replace it. Instr Course Lect, 2016, 65: 321-330.
27.	毛宾尧. 人工踝关节的发展和展望. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2005, 13(14): 1045-1048.

1. Maffulli N, Via AG, Oliva F. Chronic Achilles tendon disorders: tendinopathy and chronic rupture. Clin Sports Med, 2015, 34(4): 607-624.
2. Saxena A, Via AG, Maffulli N, et al. Subtalar arthroereisis implant removal in adults: a prospective study of 100 patients. Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(3): 500-503.
3. Eleftheriou KI, Rosenfeld PF. Lisfranc injury in the athlete: evidence supporting management from sprain to fracture dislocation. Foot Ankle Clin, 2013, 18(2): 219-236.
4. Dalmau-Pastor M, Yasui Y, Calder JD, et al. Anatomy of the inferior extensor retinaculum and its role in lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(4): 957-962.
5. Inman VT. The joints of the ankle. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1976: 117.
6. Golanó P, Vega J. Ankle sprain: Diagnosis and therapy starts with knowledge of anatomy. Aspetar Sports Med J, 2013, 2(2): 234-242.
7. Precerutti M, Bonardi M, Ferrozzi G, et al. Sonographic anatomy of the ankle. J Ultrasound, 2014, 17(2): 79-87.
8. Koller JR, Remy CD, Ferris DP. Biomechanics and energetics of walking in powered ankle exoskeletons using myoelectric control versus mechanically intrinsic control. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2018, 15(1): 42.
9. Pangrazzi GJ, Baker EA, Shaheen PJ, et al. Single-surgeon experience and complications of a fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int, 2018, 39(1): 46-58.
10. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1996, 78(11): 1658-1664.
11. Newton SE 3rd. Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1982, 64(1): 104-111.
12. Demottaz JD, Mazur JM, Thomas WH, et al. Clinical study of total ankle replacement with gait analysis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1979, 61(7): 976-988.
13. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL, Ilstrup DM, et al. Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1994, 76: 974-979.
14. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K, et al. Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, (252): 209-216.
15. Kofoed H. Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR). Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (424): 73-79.
16. Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2003, 85(3): 334-341.
17. Kerkhoff YR, Kosse NM, Metsaars WP, et al. Long-term functional and radiographic outcome of a mobile bearing ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int, 2016, 37(12): 1292-1302.
18. Mann JA, Mann RA, Horton E. STAR^TM ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int, 2011, 32(5): S473-S484.
19. Devries JG, Berlet GC, Lee TH, et al. Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE. Foot Ankle Spec, 2011, 4(4): 235-244.
20. Schuberth JM, Christensen JC, Rialson JA. Metal-reinforced cement augmentation for complex talar subsidence in failed total ankle arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2011, 50(6): 766-772.
21. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, et al. Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle: Part 1: Rang of motion. Foot Ankle Int, 2003, 24(12): 881-887.
22. Hintermann B, Zwicky L, Knupp M, et al. HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(13): 1166-1174.
23. Hintermann B, Barg A, Knupp M, et al. Conversion of painful ankle arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2009, 91(4): 850-858.
24. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Locher J, et al. Outcome of ankle arthrodesis and ankle prosthesis: a review of the current status. Br Med Bull, 2017, 124(1): 91-112.
25. Stavrakis AI, SooHoo NF. Trends in complication rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2016, 98(17): 1453-1458.
26. Hayes BJ, Gonzalez T, Smith JT, et al. Ankle arthritis: you can′t always replace it. Instr Course Lect, 2016, 65: 321-330.
27. 毛宾尧. 人工踝关节的发展和展望. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2005, 13(14): 1045-1048.

Previous Article
Study on development and biomechanics test of plastic rod-hook plate
Next Article
Application of preoperative digital-template planning in total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Development and clinical application of ankle prosthesis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content