• 1. Department of Orthopaedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Jiangsu, 221002, P.R.China;
  • 2. Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Jiangsu, 221004, P.R.China;
ZHAO Fengchao, Email: zhjianzh@vip.sina.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To evaluate the effect of the surgeon’s handedness on the distribution of prosthesis during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 86 patients (100 knees) with primary TKA completed by the same right-handed surgeon between December 2016 and December 2018, including 72 cases of single knee and 14 of bilateral knees. The patients were divided into dominant group (right side) and non-dominant group (left side) according to the operating position of the surgeon and each group had 50 knees. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, clinical diagnosis, preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and other general data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and complications were recorded in both groups. The function of knee was evaluated by HSS score. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured by using X-ray film of full-length lower extremity before TKA and at 2 weeks after TKA that were used to evaluate the coronal position of the prosthesis. Posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) were measured by using lateral X-ray films at 3 months after operation that were used to evaluate the sagittal position of the prosthesis.Results There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=−1.128, P=0.262). One case of posterior tibial artery thrombosis occurred in the dominant group, and 1 case of poor healing of the incision occurred in each of the dominant group and the non-dominant group. Patients in both groups were followed up 12-34 months with an average of 22.0 months. The HSS scores at last follow-up were 87.2±4.3 in the dominant group and 86.8±5.0 in the non-dominant group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.471, P=0.639). No complications such as periprosthetic infection, prosthetic loosening, or periprosthetic fracture occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the HKA, mLDFA, and mMPTA between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). The differences in the incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition and PDFA between the two groups were significant (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the PPTA, the rate of femoral prosthesis distributed in the neutral position, the incidence of over-flexed femoral prosthesis, and the incidence of anterior femoral notch (P>0.05).Conclusion The surgeon’s handedness is one of the factors affecting the placement of the sagittal femoral prosthesis in primary TKA. The incidence of sagittal femoral prosthesis malposition could increase when the surgeon performs on the non-dominant side.

Citation: LIU Lei, ZHAO Fengchao, ZHA Guochun, ZHENG Xin, YANG Guanjie, XU Shizhuang. Effect of surgeon’s handedness on distribution of prosthesis during primary total knee arthroplasty. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2020, 34(6): 696-701. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201911042 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with anatomic medullary locking prosthesis and its long-term effectiveness
  • Next Article

    Application of modified anterolateral supra-fibular-head approach in treatment of tibial plateau fractures involving posterolateral column