Research progress on the biological properties of the surface nanocrystals of typical medical metal materials_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

ZHOU Wenhao ¹ , ZHANG Wei ¹ , HUO Wangtu ¹ , LU Jinwen ¹ , ZENG Depeng ¹ , YU Zhentao ¹ ,  YU Sen ^1,2

1. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Biomedical Metal Materials, Northwest Institute for Non-Ferrous Metal Research, Xi’an Shaanxi, 710016, P.R.China;
2. Institue of Advanced Meterials, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang Jiangxi, 330013, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

YU Sen, Email: ninbrc@163.com

Keywords：

Biomedical metal materials; nanocrystallization; biocompatibility

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.202009084

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Biomedical metal materials have always been a major biomedical material with a large and wide range of clinical use due to their excellent properties such as high strength and toughness, fatigue resistance, easy forming, and corrosion resistance. They are also the preferred implant material for hard tissues (bones and teeth that need to withstand higher loads) and interventional stents. And nano-medical metal materials have better corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. This article focuses on the changes and improvements in the properties of several typical medical metal materials surfaces after nanocrystallization, and discusses the current problems and development prospects of nano-medical metal materials.

Citation： ZHOU Wenhao, ZHANG Wei, HUO Wangtu, LU Jinwen, ZENG Depeng, YU Zhentao, YU Sen. Research progress on the biological properties of the surface nanocrystals of typical medical metal materials. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021, 35(3): 303-306. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202009084 Copy

1.	张永涛, 刘汉源, 王昌, 等. 生物医用金属材料的研究应用现状及发展趋势. 热加工工艺, 2017, 46(4): 21-26.
2.	魏利娜, 甄珍, 奚廷斐. 生物医用材料及其产业现状. 生物医学工程研究, 2018, 37(1): 1-5.
3.	乔丽英, 高家诚, 王勇. 镁基生物材料表面改性及其生物相容性的研究与发展现状. 中国材料进展, 2011, 30(4): 23-28.
4.	Ren L, Yang K. Bio-functional design for metal implants, a new concept for development of metallic biomaterials. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2013, 29(11): 1005-1010.
5.	Han HS, Loffredo S, Jun I, et al. Current status and outlook on the clinical translation of biodegradable metals. Materials Today, 2019, 23(12): 57-71.
6.	Balasundaram G, Webster TJ. A perspective on nanophase materials for orthopedic implant applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2006, 16(38): 3737-3745.
7.	Leeuwenburgh S, Jansen JA, Malda J, et al. Trends in biomaterials research: An analysis of the scientific programme of the World Biomaterials Congress 2008. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(21): 3047-3052.
8.	Liu X, Chu PK, Ding C. Surface nano-functionalization of biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2010, 70(3-6): 275-302.
9.	Webster TJ, Ahn ES. Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineering bone//Tissue Engineering Ⅱ. Switzerland: Springer, 2006: 275-308.
10.	Balusamy T, Kumar S, Sankara N Tsn. Effect of surface nanocrystallization on the corrosion behaviour of AISI 409 stainless steel. Corrosion Science, 2010, 52(11): 3826-3834.
11.	Hajizadeh K, Maleki-Ghaleh H, Arabi A, et al. Corrosion and biological behavior of nanostructured 316L stainless steel processed by severe plastic deformation. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2015, 47(10): 978-985.
12.	Lu J, Zhang Y, Huo W, et al. Electrochemical corrosion characteristics and biocompatibility of nanostructured titanium for implants. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 434: 63-72.
13.	Huo WT, Zhao LZ, Zhang W, et al. In vitro corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of nanostructured Ti6Al4V. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2018, 92: 268-279.
14.	Huo W, Lin X, Yu S, et al. Corrosion behavior and cytocompatibility of nano-grained AZ31 Mg alloy. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54(5): 4409-4422.
15.	Huo W, Zhao L, Yu S, et al. Significantly enhanced osteoblast response to nano-grained pure tantalum. Scientific reports, 2017, 7: 40868.
16.	Feng F, Wu Y, Xin H, et al. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of ultrafine-grain Ti after sandblasting and acid etching for dental implants. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2019, 5(10): 5107-5115.
17.	de Oliveira DP, Toniato TV, Ricci R, et al. Biological response of chemically treated surface of the ultrafine-grained Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy for biomedical applications. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019, 14: 1725-1736.
18.	Masrouri M, Faraji G, Pedram M S, et al. In-vivo study of ultrafine-grained CP-Ti dental implants surface modified by SLActive with excellent wettability. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2020, 102: 102684.
19.	Yu S, Yu ZT, Han JY, et al. Haemocompatibility of Ti-3Zr-2Sn-3Mo-25Nb biomedical alloy with surface heparinization using electrostatic self assembly technology. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22(12): 3046-3052.
20.	Yu S, Yu Z T. Preparation and activation of micro-arc oxidation films on a TLM titanium alloy. Biomedical Materials, 2008, 3(4): 044112.
21.	Dargusch M S, Wang G, Kent D, et al. Comparison of the microstructure and biocorrosion properties of additively manufactured and conventionally fabricated near β Ti-25Nb-3Zr-3Mo-2Sn alloy. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2019, 5(11): 5844-5856.
22.	Razavi M, Fathi M, Savabi O, et al. Surface microstructure and in vitro analysis of nanostructured akermanite (Ca2MgSi2O7) coating on biodegradable magnesium alloy for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2014, 117: 432-440.
23.	Bakhsheshi-Rad H, Hamzah E, Ismail A, et al. Synthesis of a novel nanostructured zinc oxide/baghdadite coating on Mg alloy for biomedical application: In-vitro degradation behavior and antibacterial activities. Ceramics International, 2017, 43(17): 14842-14850.

1. 张永涛, 刘汉源, 王昌, 等. 生物医用金属材料的研究应用现状及发展趋势. 热加工工艺, 2017, 46(4): 21-26.
2. 魏利娜, 甄珍, 奚廷斐. 生物医用材料及其产业现状. 生物医学工程研究, 2018, 37(1): 1-5.
3. 乔丽英, 高家诚, 王勇. 镁基生物材料表面改性及其生物相容性的研究与发展现状. 中国材料进展, 2011, 30(4): 23-28.
4. Ren L, Yang K. Bio-functional design for metal implants, a new concept for development of metallic biomaterials. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2013, 29(11): 1005-1010.
5. Han HS, Loffredo S, Jun I, et al. Current status and outlook on the clinical translation of biodegradable metals. Materials Today, 2019, 23(12): 57-71.
6. Balasundaram G, Webster TJ. A perspective on nanophase materials for orthopedic implant applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2006, 16(38): 3737-3745.
7. Leeuwenburgh S, Jansen JA, Malda J, et al. Trends in biomaterials research: An analysis of the scientific programme of the World Biomaterials Congress 2008. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(21): 3047-3052.
8. Liu X, Chu PK, Ding C. Surface nano-functionalization of biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2010, 70(3-6): 275-302.
9. Webster TJ, Ahn ES. Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineering bone//Tissue Engineering Ⅱ. Switzerland: Springer, 2006: 275-308.
10. Balusamy T, Kumar S, Sankara N Tsn. Effect of surface nanocrystallization on the corrosion behaviour of AISI 409 stainless steel. Corrosion Science, 2010, 52(11): 3826-3834.
11. Hajizadeh K, Maleki-Ghaleh H, Arabi A, et al. Corrosion and biological behavior of nanostructured 316L stainless steel processed by severe plastic deformation. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2015, 47(10): 978-985.
12. Lu J, Zhang Y, Huo W, et al. Electrochemical corrosion characteristics and biocompatibility of nanostructured titanium for implants. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 434: 63-72.
13. Huo WT, Zhao LZ, Zhang W, et al. In vitro corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of nanostructured Ti6Al4V. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2018, 92: 268-279.
14. Huo W, Lin X, Yu S, et al. Corrosion behavior and cytocompatibility of nano-grained AZ31 Mg alloy. Journal of Materials Science, 2019, 54(5): 4409-4422.
15. Huo W, Zhao L, Yu S, et al. Significantly enhanced osteoblast response to nano-grained pure tantalum. Scientific reports, 2017, 7: 40868.
16. Feng F, Wu Y, Xin H, et al. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of ultrafine-grain Ti after sandblasting and acid etching for dental implants. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2019, 5(10): 5107-5115.
17. de Oliveira DP, Toniato TV, Ricci R, et al. Biological response of chemically treated surface of the ultrafine-grained Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy for biomedical applications. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019, 14: 1725-1736.
18. Masrouri M, Faraji G, Pedram M S, et al. In-vivo study of ultrafine-grained CP-Ti dental implants surface modified by SLActive with excellent wettability. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2020, 102: 102684.
19. Yu S, Yu ZT, Han JY, et al. Haemocompatibility of Ti-3Zr-2Sn-3Mo-25Nb biomedical alloy with surface heparinization using electrostatic self assembly technology. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22(12): 3046-3052.
20. Yu S, Yu Z T. Preparation and activation of micro-arc oxidation films on a TLM titanium alloy. Biomedical Materials, 2008, 3(4): 044112.
21. Dargusch M S, Wang G, Kent D, et al. Comparison of the microstructure and biocorrosion properties of additively manufactured and conventionally fabricated near β Ti-25Nb-3Zr-3Mo-2Sn alloy. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2019, 5(11): 5844-5856.
22. Razavi M, Fathi M, Savabi O, et al. Surface microstructure and in vitro analysis of nanostructured akermanite (Ca2MgSi2O7) coating on biodegradable magnesium alloy for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2014, 117: 432-440.
23. Bakhsheshi-Rad H, Hamzah E, Ismail A, et al. Synthesis of a novel nanostructured zinc oxide/baghdadite coating on Mg alloy for biomedical application: In-vitro degradation behavior and antibacterial activities. Ceramics International, 2017, 43(17): 14842-14850.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Research progress on the biological properties of the surface nanocrystals of typical medical metal materials

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content