1. |
Jackson JP, Waugh W. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1961, 43-B: 746-751.
|
2. |
Hantes ME, Natsaridis P, Koutalos AA, et al. Satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes can be expected in young patients under 45 years old after open wedge high tibial osteotomy in a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(11): 3199-3205.
|
3. |
Gaasbeek RD, Nicolaas L, Rijnberg WJ, et al. Correction accuracy and collateral laxity in open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. A one-year randomised controlled study. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(2): 201-207.
|
4. |
Kwun JD, Kim HJ, Park J, et al. Open wedge high tibial osteotomy using three-dimensional printed models: Experimental analysis using porcine bone. Knee, 2017, 24(1): 16-22.
|
5. |
Mao Y, Xiong Y, Li Q, et al. 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation technique vs. conventional technique in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: A prospective comparative atudy. Biomed Res Int, 2020, 2020: 1923172. doi: 10.1155/2020/1923172.
|
6. |
Iorio R, Pagnottelli M, Vadalà A, et al. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: comparison between manual and computer-assisted techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(1): 113-119.
|
7. |
Pérez-Mañanes R, Burró JA, Manaute JR, et al. 3D surgical printing cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: Do it yourself. J Knee Surg, 2016, 29(8): 690-695.
|
8. |
Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M, et al. Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2017, 103(2): 245-250.
|
9. |
Yang JC, Chen CF, Luo CA, et al. Clinical experience using a 3D-printed patient-specific instrument for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 9246529. doi: 10.1155/2018/9246529.
|
10. |
Jacquet C, Sharma A, Fabre M, et al. Patient-specific high-tibial osteotomy’s ‘cutting-guides’ decrease operating time and the number of fluoroscopic images taken after a Brief Learning Curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(9): 2854-2862.
|
11. |
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis, 1957, 16(4): 494-502.
|
12. |
Brinkman JM, Luites JW, Wymenga AB, et al. Early full weight bearing is safe in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Acta Orthop, 2010, 81(2): 193-198.
|
13. |
Saito T, Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, et al. Five- to ten-year outcome following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with rigid plate fixation in combination with an artificial bone substitute. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(3): 339-344.
|
14. |
Martay JL, Palmer AJ, Bangerter NK, et al. A preliminary modeling investigation into the safe correction zone for high tibial osteotomy. Knee, 2018, 25(2): 286-295.
|
15. |
Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, et al. Factors affecting cartilage repair after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 779-784.
|
16. |
Amendola A. Unicompartmental osteoarthritis in the active patient: the role of high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19 Suppl 1: 109-116.
|
17. |
Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, et al. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1987, 69(3): 332-354.
|
18. |
Van den Bempt M, Van Genechten W, Claes T, et al. How accurately does high tibial osteotomy correct the mechanical axis of an arthritic varus knee? A systematic review. Knee, 2016, 23(6): 925-935.
|
19. |
Kim HJ, Park J, Shin JY, et al. More accurate correction can be obtained using a three-dimensional printed model in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(11): 3452-3458.
|
20. |
Han SB, Kim HJ, Lee DH. Effect of computer navigation on accuracy and reliability of limb alignment correction following open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 3803457. doi: 10.1155/2017/3803457.
|
21. |
Lee YS, Moon GH. Comparative analysis of osteotomy accuracy between the conventional and devised technique using a protective cutting system in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Sci, 2015, 20(1): 129-136.
|
22. |
Heijens E, Kornherr P, Meister C. The role of navigation in high tibial osteotomy: a study of 50 patients. Orthopedics, 2009, 32(10 Suppl): 40-43.
|
23. |
Kim SJ, Koh YG, Chun YM, et al. Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(2): 128-134.
|
24. |
Cerciello S, Ollivier M, Corona K, et al. CAS and PSI increase coronal alignment accuracy and reduce outliers when compared to traditional technique of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 10. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06253-5.
|
25. |
Chaouche S, Jacquet C, Fabre-Aubrespy M, et al. Patient-specific cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: safety and accuracy analysis of a hundred patients continuous cohort. Int Orthop, 2019, 43(12): 2757-2765.
|
26. |
Fucentese SF, Meier P, Jud L, et al. Accuracy of 3D-planned patient specific instrumentation in high tibial open wedge valgisation osteotomy. J Exp Orthop, 2020, 7(1): 7. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00224-y.
|