YUAN Wei , LIU Xinchun , CONG Lin , ZHU Haitao , CUI Cui , PEI Lei , WANG Han , ZHU Yue
  • Department of Orthopedics, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P. R. China;
ZHU Yue, Email: zhuyuedr@163.com
Robotic surgery; thoracolumbar fracture; ankylosing spondylitis; internal fixation
10.7507/1002-1892.202405103
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

Objective To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted (RA) minimally invasive surgery versus traditional fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) open posterior fixation surgery in treating thoracolumbar fractures with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods A clinical data of 21 cases of thoracolumbar fractures with AS who met the selection criteria between December 2016 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Ten cases underwent RA minimally invasive surgery group (RA group) and 11 cases underwent FA open posterior fixation surgery (FA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture segment distribution, fracture type, time from injury to surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading between RA group and FA group (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, radiation exposure time, radiation dose, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded. According to Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by CT within 1 week after surgery. During follow-up, pain and nerve function were evaluated by VAS score and ASIA grading. Results All patients underwent surgery successfully, and there was no significant difference in operation time (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in the RA group were significantly less than those in the FA group (P<0.05), and the radiation exposure time and radiation dose were significantly more than those in the FA group (P<0.05). A total of 249 pedicle screws were implanted in the two groups, including 118 in the RA group and 131 in the FA group. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grades A and B) in the RA group was significantly higher than that in the FA group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 3-12 months, with an average of 6.8 months. The VAS scores of the two groups after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). The RA group had lower scores than the fluoroscopy group at 1 week and 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in neurological function grading between groups at 1 week and 3 months after surgery (P>0.05). In the FA group, 1 case of deep infection and 1 case of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity occurred, while no complication occurred in the RA group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion  Both RA minimally invasive surgery and FA open posterior fixation surgery can achieve good effectiveness. Compared with the latter, the former has more advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and accuracy of pedicle screw insertion.

Citation： YUAN Wei, LIU Xinchun, CONG Lin, ZHU Haitao, CUI Cui, PEI Lei, WANG Han, ZHU Yue. Robot-assisted versus traditional fluoroscopy-assisted posterior fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2024, 38(8): 929-934. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202405103 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Preliminary comparative study of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement using different surgical approaches

  • Next Article

    Treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis with robot-assisted and minimally invasive access via transforaminal expansion approach