• Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,General Hospital of Lanzhou MilitaryRegion,Lanzhou 730050,P. R. China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To summarize treatment experience and evaluate clinical outcomes of surgical therapy for Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD). Methods Clinical data of 48 patients with Stanford type A AD who underwent surgical treatment in General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Region from October 2006 to March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 41 males and 7 females with their age of 26-72 (47.6±9.2) years. There were 43 patients with acute Stanford type A AD (interval between symptom onset and diagnosis<14 days) and 5 patients with chronic AD. There were 19 patients with moderate to severe aortic insufficiency and 6 patients with Marfan symdrome but good aortic valve function,who all received Bentall procedure,total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation. There were 8 patients with AD involving the aortic root but good aortic valve function who underwent modified David procedure,total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation. There were 10 patients with AD involving the ascending aorta who received ascending aorta replacement,total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation. There were 5 patients with AD involving partial aortic arch who underwent ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement. Patients were followed up in the 3rd,6th and 12th month after discharge then once every year. Follow-up evaluation included general patient conditions,blood pressure control,chest pain recurrence,mobility and computerized tomography arteriography (CTA). ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time was 121-500 (191.4±50.6) minutes,aortic cross-clamp time was 58-212 (112.3±31.7) minutes,and circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion time was 26-56 (34.8±8.7) minutes. Postoperative mechanicalventilation time was 32-250 (76.2±35.6) hours,and ICU stay was 3-20 (7.1±3.4) days. Thoracic drainage within 24 hours postoperatively was 680-1 600 (1 092.5±236.3) ml. Seven patients (14.5%) died perioperatively including 2 patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,2 patients with low cardiac output syndrome,1 patient with renal failure,1patient with delayed refractory hemorrhage,and 1 patient with coma. Twenty patients had other postoperative complicationsand were cured or improved after treatment. A total of 38 patients [92.7% (38/41)] were followed up for 3-48 (13.0±8.9) months,and 3 patients were lost during follow-up. During follow-up,there were 36 patients alive and 2 patients who died of other chronic diseases. There was no AD-related death during follow-up. None of the patients required reoperation for AD or false-lumen expansion. CTA at 6th month after discharge showed no anastomotic leakage,graft distortion or obstruction.Conclusion According to aortic intimal tear locations,ascending aorta diameter and AD involving scopes,appropriate surgical strategies,timing and organ protection are the key strategies to achieve optimal surgical results for Stanford type A AD. Combined axillary and femoral artery perfusion and increased lowest intraoperative temperature are good methods for satisfactory surgical outcomes of Stanford type A AD.

Citation: DONG Yifei,LU Andong,MING Kai,YIN Qing,DONG Shuqiang,CAO Wenfeng,MENG Yi .. Surgical Treatment of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2013, 20(6): 647-652. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.20130204 Copy

  • Previous Article

    新辅助化疗后直肠癌残留黏膜病变的临床意义
  • Next Article

    新辅助化疗后直肠癌残留黏膜病变的临床意义