• 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, P.R.China;
  • 2. Department of Pathology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, P.R.China;
LIMin, Email: limin_4212@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To observe the protective effects of simvastatin at different stages on monocrotaline (MCT) induced pulmonary arteral hypertension (PAH) in rats and evaluate the early preventive effect of simvastatin. Methods Twenty-four male SD rats were randomized into a control group, a PAH group, an early intervention group, and a late intervention group, with 6 rats in each group. The rats in the control group received intraperitoneal injection of normal saline (NS) on d0. The rats in the PAH group received one-off intraperitoneal injection of MCT (50 mg/kg) on d0. The rats in the early intervention group were pretreated with oral gavage of simvastatin (20 mg·kg–1·d–1)(d–7––1) before the intraperitoneal one-off injection of MCT (50 mg/kg, d0) and continued with oral gavage of simvastatin for 14 days (d1~14). The rats in the late intervention group received one-off intraperitoneal injection of MCT (50 mg/kg)(d0) and oral gavage of simvastatin (20 mg·kg–1·d–1) for the next 21 days (d15~35). Thirty-five days after the MCT injection (d36), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were measured by right heart catheter. Then the rats were sacrificed for separating the heart and lung, the right ventricular hypertrophy index (RVHI) and percentage of small pulmonary arteries media thickness (WT%), the inflammation score around the small pulmonary arterial were recorded. Results Compared with those in the PAH group, RVSP, mPAP, RVHI and WT% in two simvastatin interventiongroups got much better (P<0.01), and the inflammation score around the small pulmonary arterial declined (P<0.05). Compared with those in the late intervention group, RVSP, mPAP in the early intervention group improved (P<0.05) and WT% decreased more significantly (P<0.01). However RVHI and the inflammation score around the small pulmonary arterial were not different between two simvastatin intervention groups. Conclusions Both early intervention and late intervention with simvastatin can reduce RVSP, mPAP and WT% in MCT induced PAH rats. Compared with later intervention, early intervention can prevent PAH more remarkably.

Citation: DINGYongjie, ZHANGBenyan, LIMin. Protective Effects of Simvastatin on Monocrotaline-Induced Pulmonary Arteral Hypertension in Rats. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017, 16(1): 64-70. doi: 10.7507/1671-6205.201606049 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Changes of Platelet MKK3 Phosphorylation Level in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Rats
  • Next Article