Translation and psychometric evaluation of Chinese version of King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease_Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Authors：

WU Xiaobing ¹ , LI Jiaying ¹ , LIANG Xinyin ¹ , XU Yanni ¹ , LIU Wuzhen ¹ ,  LAN Yutao ²

1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, P. R. China;
2. Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, School of Nursing, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

LAN Yutao, Email: 690936515@qq.com

Keywords：

Interstitial lung disease; Health status; Reliability; Validity

DOI：

10.7507/1671-6205.201910015

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To translate the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) to Chinese, so as to provide an well reliability and validity assessment instrument for health status of patients with interstitial lung disease.Methods Brislin’s transition model, six expert’s panel and pre-survey were used for initial Chinese version of K-BILD. Items analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were used for validity and reliability test with 122 respondents.Results Ten-item Chinese version of K-BILD were proved to have great psychometric qualities, two factors were extracted by EFA, which could explain 63.35% of the total variance. Furthermore, the CFA demonstrates the fit indices of two-factors mode: χ²/df=0.797, RMSEA=0.000, NFI=0.848, IFI=1.048, CFI=1.000, TLI=1.071. Cronbach’s α and Guttman Split-half were 0.893 and 0.861, respectively. Besides, the test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.805.Conclusion The Chinese version of K-BILD scale has good validity and reliability, which is applicable for health status assessment in patient with interstitial lung disease.

Citation： WU Xiaobing, LI Jiaying, LIANG Xinyin, XU Yanni, LIU Wuzhen, LAN Yutao. Translation and psychometric evaluation of Chinese version of King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2021, 20(1): 12-16. doi: 10.7507/1671-6205.201910015 Copy

1.	Meyer KC. Multidisciplinary discussions and interstitial lung disease diagnosis: how useful is a meeting of the minds?. Lancet Respir Med, 2016, 4(7): 529-531.
2.	Bajwah S, Ross JR, Peacock JL, et al. Interventions to improve symptoms and quality of life of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a systematic review of the literature. Thorax, 2013, 68(9): 867-879.
3.	潘瑞丽, 李思嘉, 伍青, 等. 间质性肺疾病患者生活质量状况及相关因素分析. 解放军护理杂志, 2016, 33(5): 13-16, 22.
4.	Patel AS, Siegert RJ, Brignall K, et al. The development and validation of the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) health status questionnaire. Thorax, 2012, 67(9): 804-810.
5.	Wight JP, Edwards L, Brazier J, et al. The SF36 as an outcome measure of services for end stage renal failure. Qual Health Care, 1998, 7(4): 209.
6.	Xu W, Collet JP, Shapiro S, et al. Validation and clinical interpretation of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire among COPD patients, China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2009, 13(2): 181.
7.	Swigris JJ, Wilson SR, Green KE, et al. Development of the ATAQ-IPF: a tool to assess quality of life in IPF. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2010, 8(1): 77.
8.	Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 2000, 25(24): 3186-3191.
9.	Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, et al. Details of content validity and objectifying it in instrument development. Nurs Pract Today, 2014, 1(3): 163-171.
10.	吴明隆, 主编. SPSS 统计应用实务: 问卷分析与应用统计. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003, 158.
11.	吴明隆, 主编. 结构方程模型: AMOS 的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010, 283.
12.	王璐, 赵楠, 吕思慧, 等. 团体心理辅导联合同伴教育在间质性肺疾病患者中的应用效果. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(1): 97-99.
13.	Vries JD, Drent M. Quality of life and health status in sarcoidosis: a review. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2007, 28(1): 121-127.
14.	张永爱, 李小妹, 张海苗, 等. 月经症状量表中文版的信度和效度评价. 中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(3): 374-377.
15.	Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5): 489-497.
16.	陈静, 张贤, 张振香, 等. 医护合作量表的汉化及信效度检验. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(2): 236-240.
17.	周玲, 孔红武, 王薇. 慢性疼痛患者整体疼痛评估量表的汉化及信效度评价. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(9): 1121-1124.
18.	Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 2018, 9(8): 2207.
19.	Swigris JJ, Kuschner WG, Jacobs SS, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. Thorax, 2005, 60(7): 588-594.

1. Meyer KC. Multidisciplinary discussions and interstitial lung disease diagnosis: how useful is a meeting of the minds?. Lancet Respir Med, 2016, 4(7): 529-531.
2. Bajwah S, Ross JR, Peacock JL, et al. Interventions to improve symptoms and quality of life of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a systematic review of the literature. Thorax, 2013, 68(9): 867-879.
3. 潘瑞丽, 李思嘉, 伍青, 等. 间质性肺疾病患者生活质量状况及相关因素分析. 解放军护理杂志, 2016, 33(5): 13-16, 22.
4. Patel AS, Siegert RJ, Brignall K, et al. The development and validation of the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) health status questionnaire. Thorax, 2012, 67(9): 804-810.
5. Wight JP, Edwards L, Brazier J, et al. The SF36 as an outcome measure of services for end stage renal failure. Qual Health Care, 1998, 7(4): 209.
6. Xu W, Collet JP, Shapiro S, et al. Validation and clinical interpretation of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire among COPD patients, China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2009, 13(2): 181.
7. Swigris JJ, Wilson SR, Green KE, et al. Development of the ATAQ-IPF: a tool to assess quality of life in IPF. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2010, 8(1): 77.
8. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 2000, 25(24): 3186-3191.
9. Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, et al. Details of content validity and objectifying it in instrument development. Nurs Pract Today, 2014, 1(3): 163-171.
10. 吴明隆, 主编. SPSS 统计应用实务: 问卷分析与应用统计. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003, 158.
11. 吴明隆, 主编. 结构方程模型: AMOS 的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010, 283.
12. 王璐, 赵楠, 吕思慧, 等. 团体心理辅导联合同伴教育在间质性肺疾病患者中的应用效果. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(1): 97-99.
13. Vries JD, Drent M. Quality of life and health status in sarcoidosis: a review. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2007, 28(1): 121-127.
14. 张永爱, 李小妹, 张海苗, 等. 月经症状量表中文版的信度和效度评价. 中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(3): 374-377.
15. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5): 489-497.
16. 陈静, 张贤, 张振香, 等. 医护合作量表的汉化及信效度检验. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(2): 236-240.
17. 周玲, 孔红武, 王薇. 慢性疼痛患者整体疼痛评估量表的汉化及信效度评价. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(9): 1121-1124.
18. Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 2018, 9(8): 2207.
19. Swigris JJ, Kuschner WG, Jacobs SS, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review. Thorax, 2005, 60(7): 588-594.

Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Translation and psychometric evaluation of Chinese version of King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content