SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking(STP) 7: finding systematic reviews*_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

John N Lavis ¹ , Andrew D Oxman ² , Jeremy Grimshaw ³ , Marit Johansen ⁴ , Jennifer A Boyko ⁵ , Simon Lewin ⁶ , Atle Fretheim ⁷

1. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis;2. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services;3. Clinical Epidemiology Program;4. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services;5. Health Research Methodology Programme;

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20100415

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

系统评价越来越成为决策的重要信息来源，尤其对评价方案效果更重要。相对于单个研究，系统评价对评价方案效果有很多优势，也被视为找准问题和为备选方案提供补充意见的重要信息来源。系统评价可从比较的角度看问题，也可描述一个方案可能产生的危害。系统评价有助于理解对同一问题个人或群体怎样实施、为什么要这样实施及利益相关者对此方案的看法和经验。但大量限制因素妨碍了系统评价在决策方面更广泛的应用。这些限制因素包括对系统评价价值缺乏认识和当试图检索系统评价时决策者使用的检索词与这些系统评价原作者标注的检索词不匹配。决策者检索的信息类型与系统评价原作者未明确标注该信息类型间不匹配成为突出问题。本文我们将提出三个问题用于指导全面查找系统评价，特别是对备选方案效果评价的系统评价。这些问题包括：① 是否真正需要系统评价？② 可以通过哪些数据库和检索策略找到相关的系统评价？③ 若无相关系统评价可获得哪些替代信息？

Citation： John N Lavis,Andrew D Oxman,Jeremy Grimshaw,Marit Johansen,Jennifer A Boyko,Simon Lewin,Atle Fretheim. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking(STP) 7: finding systematic reviews*. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(4): 381-387. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100415 Copy

1.	Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). Introduction. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): I1.
2.	Lewin S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 8. Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S8.
3.	Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Souza NM, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 9. Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S9.
4.	Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 10. Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S10.
5.	Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, et al. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet, 2004, 364: 1615-1621.
6.	Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman A, et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform healthcare management and policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 35-48.
7.	Egger M, Smith GD, O’Rourke K. Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta- Analysis in Context Edited by: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ Books; 2001: 3-19.
8.	Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 5. Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S5.
9.	Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 4. Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S4.
10.	Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 45-53.
11.	Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy- making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10(Suppl 1): 6-20.
12.	Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ, 2001, 322: 98-101.
13.	Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, et al. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2002, 7: 239-244.
14.	Lavis JN, Davies HT, Gruen RL, et al. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthc Policy, 2006, 1: 21-33.
15.	Chopra M, Munro S, Lavis JN, et al. Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews. Lancet, 2008, 371: 668-674.
16.	Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 13. Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S13.
17.	Lewin S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 11. Finding and using research evidence about local conditions. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S11.
18.	Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, et al. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med, 2007, 4: e78.
19.	Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ, 2005, 330: 68.
20.	Aaserud M, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Sturm H, et al. Pharmaceutical policies: Effects of rational drug use, an overview of 13 reviews (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006.
21.	Lagarde M, Palmer N. Evidence From Systematic Reviews to Inform Decision Making Regarding Financing Mechanisms that Improve Access to Health Services for Poor People: A Policy Brief Prepared for the International Dialogue on Evidence-Informed Action to Achieve Health Goals in Developing Countries (IDEAHealth) 2006 [http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/HealthFinancingBrief.pdf]. Geneva, World Health Organization.
22.	Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care, 2001, 39: II2-45.

1. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). Introduction. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): I1.
2. Lewin S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 8. Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S8.
3. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Souza NM, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 9. Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S9.
4. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 10. Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S10.
5. Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, et al. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet, 2004, 364: 1615-1621.
6. Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman A, et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform healthcare management and policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 35-48.
7. Egger M, Smith GD, O’Rourke K. Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta- Analysis in Context Edited by: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ Books; 2001: 3-19.
8. Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 5. Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S5.
9. Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 4. Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S4.
10. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10: 45-53.
11. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy- making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10(Suppl 1): 6-20.
12. Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ, 2001, 322: 98-101.
13. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, et al. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2002, 7: 239-244.
14. Lavis JN, Davies HT, Gruen RL, et al. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthc Policy, 2006, 1: 21-33.
15. Chopra M, Munro S, Lavis JN, et al. Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews. Lancet, 2008, 371: 668-674.
16. Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 13. Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S13.
17. Lewin S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP). 11. Finding and using research evidence about local conditions. Health Res Policy Syst, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): S11.
18. Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, et al. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med, 2007, 4: e78.
19. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ, 2005, 330: 68.
20. Aaserud M, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Sturm H, et al. Pharmaceutical policies: Effects of rational drug use, an overview of 13 reviews (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006.
21. Lagarde M, Palmer N. Evidence From Systematic Reviews to Inform Decision Making Regarding Financing Mechanisms that Improve Access to Health Services for Poor People: A Policy Brief Prepared for the International Dialogue on Evidence-Informed Action to Achieve Health Goals in Developing Countries (IDEAHealth) 2006 [http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/HealthFinancingBrief.pdf]. Geneva, World Health Organization.
22. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care, 2001, 39: II2-45.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking(STP) 7: finding systematic reviews*

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content