Objective To evaluate the efficacy of asarone injection in treating respiratory disease.
Methods All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about treating respiratory disease with asarone injection were collected by searching MEDLINE (1990 to 2010), EMbase (1990 to 2010), CSJD (1989 to January 2010) and CNKI (1979 to December 2009). The assessment of methodological quality and data extraction of the included studies were performed independently by two reviewers, and Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.0 software.
Results A total of 29 studies involving 3 931 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of Meta-analysis showed that: a) Asarone injection was effective in treating respiratory diseases including bronchiolitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) and AECOPD, bronchitis and pneumonia; b) In treating bronchiolitis, asarone injection was superior to aminophylline, heartleaf houttuynia herb and virazole in total effective rate, and was similar to andrographolide in curative effect; c) In treating COPD and AECOPD, asarone injection was superior to symptomatic treatment and bromhexine in total effective rate, was similar to benzylpenicillin sodium and tablete glycyrrhiza in curative effect, and was inferior to aminophylline in total effective rate without significant difference; d) In treating bronchitis, asarone injection was superior to aminophylline and symptomatic treatment in total effective rate, and was similar to mucosolvin in curative effect; and e) In treating pneumonia, asarone injection was superior to antibiotic, ribavirin and aminophylline in total effective rate.
Conclusion Asarone injection is effective in treating respiratory disease. Because of the lower methodological quality and publication bias of the included trials, it is necessary to perform more high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials to make the conclusion more reliable.
Citation： ZHANG Qing,MA Weicong,LI Hui,MAO Shengjun. Asarone Injection in Treating Respiratory Disease: A Meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(10): 1174-1181. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100566 Copy