GRADE Guidelines: 1. Introduction to GRADE Evidence Profiles and Summary of Findings Tables△_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

GRADE; 系统评价; 临床实践指南; 卫生技术评估; 证据质量; 推荐强度

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20110076

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

本文是GRADE（Grading of Recommendations Assessment，Development，and Evaluation）系列文章的导论。该系列文章为使用GRADE系统提供指导，介绍如何将该系统用于系统评价、卫生技术评估（HTAs）及临床实践指南中备选方案的证据质量评价和推荐强度评级。GRADE方法始于提出一个明晰的问题，包括对所有重要结果的详细说明。证据被收集和汇总后，GRADE提供了明确的标准来评价其质量，包括研究设计、偏倚风险、不精确性、不一致性、间接性及效应量大小。

Citation： . GRADE Guidelines: 1. Introduction to GRADE Evidence Profiles and Summary of Findings Tables△. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2011, 11(4): 437-445. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20110076 Copy

1.	2 Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al . A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet , 2009, 373: 774-779.
2.	Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990.
3.	Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al . An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club , 2006, 144(1): A8-9.
4.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1170-1173.
5.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 924-926.
6.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . What is ‘‘quality of evidence’’ and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ , 2008, 336: 995-998.
7.	Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1049-1051.
8.	Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1106-1110.
9.	Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al . Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ , 2008, 337: a744.
10.	Brozek J, Oxman A, Sch€unemann HJ. GRADEpro. [Computer program].Version 3.2 for Windows. Available at http://mcmaster.flintbox.com/technology.asp?Page53993 and http://www.cc-ims.net/revman/gradepro. Accessed October 21, 2010.
11.	Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al . GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation; 2010.
12.	Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature.I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA , 1993, 270: 2093-2095.
13.	Akl EA, Maroun N, Guyatt G, et al . Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol , 2007, 60: 1298-1305.
14.	GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res , 2005, 5: 25.
15.	Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, et al . User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol , 2010, 63: 607-619.
16.	Rosenbaum S, Glenton C, Oxman A. Evaluation of summary of findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol , 2009.
17.	Schunemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst , 2006, 4: 13.
18.	Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0. [www.cochrane-handbook.org].
19.	Schünemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst , 2006, 4: 21.

1. 2 Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al . A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet , 2009, 373: 774-779.
2. Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990.
3. Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al . An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club , 2006, 144(1): A8-9.
4. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1170-1173.
5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 924-926.
6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . What is ‘‘quality of evidence’’ and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ , 2008, 336: 995-998.
7. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1049-1051.
8. Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1106-1110.
9. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al . Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ , 2008, 337: a744.
10. Brozek J, Oxman A, Sch€unemann HJ. GRADEpro. [Computer program].Version 3.2 for Windows. Available at http://mcmaster.flintbox.com/technology.asp?Page53993 and http://www.cc-ims.net/revman/gradepro. Accessed October 21, 2010.
11. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al . GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation; 2010.
12. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature.I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA , 1993, 270: 2093-2095.
13. Akl EA, Maroun N, Guyatt G, et al . Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol , 2007, 60: 1298-1305.
14. GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res , 2005, 5: 25.
15. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, et al . User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol , 2010, 63: 607-619.
16. Rosenbaum S, Glenton C, Oxman A. Evaluation of summary of findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol , 2009.
17. Schunemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst , 2006, 4: 13.
18. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0. [www.cochrane-handbook.org].
19. Schünemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst , 2006, 4: 21.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

GRADE Guidelines: 1. Introduction to GRADE Evidence Profiles and Summary of Findings Tables△

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content