To Promote Good Research Practice, Good Publication Practice and Good Transplation by Implementing Research Ethic and Publication Ethic_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

LIU Xuemei , LI Yan ¹ , JIANG Lanhui ² ,  LI Youping ³ , WU Taixiang ³ , ZHENG Shangwei ³ , DENG Shaolin ^4,5 , JIANG Jie ^4,5 , ZHANG Lingzhi ^4,5 , DU Liang ^6,7 , FENG Yuanjing ^1,3 , LAN Lijie ¹ , LI Tingqian ²

1. Periodicals Press of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 611041, China;2. Political College of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, Chengdu;3. Chinese Evidence-Based Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 611041, China; 4. West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;;

Corresponding author：

LI Youping, Email: yzylab@hotmail.com

Keywords：

Research ethic; Publication ethic; Good research practice (RGP); Good publication practice (GPP); Good translation practice (GTP)

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20110127

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Medical ethic and publication ethic was more and more and important with the development of trial registration and systematic review registration promoted by the World Health Organization and the Cochrane Collaboration. Chinese Trial Registration and Publication Collaboration (ChiCTRPC) published the first statement to implement trial registration in China. We suggested that trial registration should be combined with ethic review and described the new definition of publication ethic in the second meeting by ChiCTRPC in 2010. In the the third meeting of ChiCTRPC in 2011, Experts from many fields communicated adequately and reached consensus. We summarized the experiences and lessons in the 5 years after the first statement of ChiCTRPC was published. Based on the latest progress of research ethic, publication ethic, trial registration, and systematic review registration, we drafted this explanation document for the second statement of ChiCTRPC to realize good research practice (RGP), good publication practice (GPP), and good translation practice (GTP) by implementing research ethic and publication ethic.

Citation： LIU Xuemei,LI Yan,JIANG Lanhui,LI Youping,WU Taixiang,ZHENG Shangwei,DENG Shaolin,JIANG Jie,ZHANG Lingzhi,DU Liang,FENG Yuanjing,LAN Lijie,LI Tingqian. To Promote Good Research Practice, Good Publication Practice and Good Transplation by Implementing Research Ethic and Publication Ethic. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2011, 11(7): 726-732. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20110127 Copy

1.	9 Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, et al . Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics results of aninternational survey. J Med Ethics , 2009, 35: 348-C353.
2.	10 Wu T, Li Y, Bian Z, et al . Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? Trials , 2009, 10: 46.
3.	11 Jin Z, Yu D, Zhang L, et al . A Retrospective Survey of Research Design and Statistical Analyses in Selected Chinese Medical Journals in 1998 and 2008. PloS ONE , 2010, 5(5): e10822.
4.	12 Gøtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A, Johansen HK. Ghost authorship in industry-initiate drandomised trials. PloS Med , 2007, 4(1): e19.
5.	13 Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al . Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA , 1998, 280(3): 222-224.
6.	14 Rowan-Legg A, Weijer C, Gao J, et al . A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005. J Med Ethics , 2009, 35: 74-78.
7.	17 Lanzerach D. Research ethics and the problem of teaching it. Acta Medicine Lituanica , 2006, 13 (1): 12-20.
8.	李幼平, 杜亮, 刘雪梅. 推进临床试验注册和规范化报告, 从入口把关临床试验质量. 中国循证医学杂志, 2010, 10(1): 1-2.
9.	吴泰相, 李幼平, 李静, 等. 中国临床试验注册和发表机制及实施说明. 中国循证医学杂志, 2006, 6(6): 395-396.
10.	吴泰相, 李幼平, 刘关键, 等. 中国临床试验注册中心及中国循证医学中心提高我国临床试验质量和策略和措施. 中国循证医学杂志, 2010, 10(11): 1243-1248.
11.	中国循证医学中心. 医学研究伦理与编辑伦理工作会议纪要——中国临床试验注册与发表协作网第3次会议. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2011, 11(5): 封三.
12.	曹进, 张庆生, 丁丽霞. 食品药品检验实践中的科学研究规范. 齐鲁药事, 2011, (3):.
13.	Resnik DB. The Ethics of Science—— An Introduction. Rout ledge, 1998: 53, 58.
14.	Wu TX, Yang XZ, Zeng XX. Why so many ‘RCTs’ were false? A further investigation about ethics review status of the ‘RCT’ published in Chinese journals. Abstracts of the 17th Cochrane Colloquium, 2009, 51, 52.
15.	郑兴东, 姜北, 陆伟, 等. 医学科研伦理审查监管问题的思考. 第二军医大学学报, 2007, 28(6): 667 - 669.
16.	汪谋岳. 我国生物医学期刊应重视受试者的知情同意. 中国科技期刊研究, 2000, 11(5): 293-294.
17.	Library for Health Research Reporting. [2011-7-11] Available at: http://www.equator-network.org/.
18.	丘祥兴, 孙福川, 主编. 医学伦理学. 第3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009.

1. 9 Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, et al . Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics results of aninternational survey. J Med Ethics , 2009, 35: 348-C353.
2. 10 Wu T, Li Y, Bian Z, et al . Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? Trials , 2009, 10: 46.
3. 11 Jin Z, Yu D, Zhang L, et al . A Retrospective Survey of Research Design and Statistical Analyses in Selected Chinese Medical Journals in 1998 and 2008. PloS ONE , 2010, 5(5): e10822.
4. 12 Gøtzsche PC, Hróbjartsson A, Johansen HK. Ghost authorship in industry-initiate drandomised trials. PloS Med , 2007, 4(1): e19.
5. 13 Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, et al . Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA , 1998, 280(3): 222-224.
6. 14 Rowan-Legg A, Weijer C, Gao J, et al . A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005. J Med Ethics , 2009, 35: 74-78.
7. 17 Lanzerach D. Research ethics and the problem of teaching it. Acta Medicine Lituanica , 2006, 13 (1): 12-20.
8. 李幼平, 杜亮, 刘雪梅. 推进临床试验注册和规范化报告, 从入口把关临床试验质量. 中国循证医学杂志, 2010, 10(1): 1-2.
9. 吴泰相, 李幼平, 李静, 等. 中国临床试验注册和发表机制及实施说明. 中国循证医学杂志, 2006, 6(6): 395-396.
10. 吴泰相, 李幼平, 刘关键, 等. 中国临床试验注册中心及中国循证医学中心提高我国临床试验质量和策略和措施. 中国循证医学杂志, 2010, 10(11): 1243-1248.
11. 中国循证医学中心. 医学研究伦理与编辑伦理工作会议纪要——中国临床试验注册与发表协作网第3次会议. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2011, 11(5): 封三.
12. 曹进, 张庆生, 丁丽霞. 食品药品检验实践中的科学研究规范. 齐鲁药事, 2011, (3):.
13. Resnik DB. The Ethics of Science—— An Introduction. Rout ledge, 1998: 53, 58.
14. Wu TX, Yang XZ, Zeng XX. Why so many ‘RCTs’ were false? A further investigation about ethics review status of the ‘RCT’ published in Chinese journals. Abstracts of the 17th Cochrane Colloquium, 2009, 51, 52.
15. 郑兴东, 姜北, 陆伟, 等. 医学科研伦理审查监管问题的思考. 第二军医大学学报, 2007, 28(6): 667 - 669.
16. 汪谋岳. 我国生物医学期刊应重视受试者的知情同意. 中国科技期刊研究, 2000, 11(5): 293-294.
17. Library for Health Research Reporting. [2011-7-11] Available at: http://www.equator-network.org/.
18. 丘祥兴, 孙福川, 主编. 医学伦理学. 第3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

To Promote Good Research Practice, Good Publication Practice and Good Transplation by Implementing Research Ethic and Publication Ethic

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content