Objective 　To review and evaluate the global clinical research literatures about the surgical management for prostatic abscess in the past decade, so as to provide useful information for clinical practice.
Methods 　Based on the principles of evidence-based medicine, and the methods of bibliometrics, the PubMed database was searched from January 1st 2000 to April 10th 2011. The literatures about prostatic abscess were screened according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality was assessed, the valid data were extracted and then systematical evaluation was performed after the establishment of the database with OpenOffice.org 3.8 Calc.
Results 　a) A total of 205 articles were found initially and 81 were finally included with the total 388 cases involved (on average, 4.79 cases per paper). The patients’ ages ranged from 10 days to 83 years old. Two studies were diagnostic tests, and all the other 79 were surgical intervention studies; b) There was no controlled clinical trail. A total of 16 studies involving more than 5 cases for each and 311 cases in all which were retrospective case analyses, all the other 65 were individual case reports; c) American scholars published 13 papers (16.5%), ranked as the first. American and European scientists published 36 papers (44.44%). Chinese scholars published quite fewer studies, of which only 2 were in English; d) The incidence increased in younger patients gradually. The pathogens included fungi and bacteria. Most bacteria were gram-positive cocci (such as Staphylococci), followed by gram-negative bacillus (such as Klebsiella). There were also some minority pathogens. The pathogens were complex and quite diverse in different districts. The predisposing factors included both regional and systematic conditions, with diabetes mellitus, hepatocirrhosis, manipulations of lower urinary tract and urinary tract infections as the common; e) The diagnostic procedures included evaluation on symptoms and signs, physical examination, identification of pathogens, and medical imaging examinations (TRUS, CT, MRI). The therapeutic options included routine managements, conservative antibiotic therapies and surgical drainages. The surgical routes were transcutaneous, transperineal, transrectal, and transurethral. The fine needle aspiration, indwelling catheter drainage, or incision and drainage were performed under the guidance of TRUS, EUS or CT through transperineal or transrectal routes. The TUR, TURP or TUIP drainages were performed through transurethral route. The failed cases of fine needle aspiration were then treated by transurethral or transperineal incision and drainages, and some patients were also treated by urinary diversion; f) The best surgical method could not be concluded for lack of controlled data; and g) Few cases died from severe complications, and the outcomes of the majority cases were good.
Conclusion 　a) The literatures about prostatic abscess are abundant but of low quality, with all retrospective studies or individual case reports, and most are published by American and European scholars; b) The prostatic abscess affects all ages but tends to increase in the young. Most pathogens are the gram-positive cocci (such as Staphylococci) ranked as the top and followed by gram-negative bacillus (such as Klebsiella), and the pathogens are obviously diverse in different districts; c) The predisposing factors are commonly seen as diabetes mellitus, hepatocirrhosis, manipulations of lower urinary tract and urinary tract infections; ......

Citation： XIONG Guobing,GONG Baisheng,QIU Mingxing,WANG Kunjie. Evidence-Based Evaluation on Global Clinical Research Literatures about Prostatic Abscess in the Past Decade. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2012, 12(1): 98-103. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20120017 Copy