• Department of Geriatric Respiratory, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
LIU Xiaoju, Email: liu_xiaoju@yahoo.com.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To assess the effectiveness and safety of moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).
Methods  Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and VIP were electronically searched, and the relevant conference proceedings were also hand-searched. The search time was up to July, 2011. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin for AECOPD were included. Literature was screened according to inclusive and exclusive criteria, data were extracted, quality was assessed, and then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.
Results  A total of 6 RCTs involving 482 patients with AECOPD were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that moxifloxacin group was significantly superior to levofloxacin group in the effective rate (OR=3.15, 95%CI 1.80 to 5.49, P lt;0.000 1). The bacterial clearance rate in moxifloxacin group was also higher than that in the levofloxacin group (OR=2.79, 95%CI 1.30 to 5.97, P=0.008). In addition, adverse effects of moxifloxacin group were less than levofloxacin (OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.98, P=0.04).
Conclusion  Based on current studies, moxifloxacin is superior to levofloxacin in improving effective rate and bacterial clearance rate, and in lowering side effects when treating AECOPD. Hence it is considerable to use moxifloxacin instead of levofloxacin in the treatment of AECOPD if necessary. Due to the limitation of both quantity and quality of included studies, this conclusion should be further confirmed with more high quality and large sample studies.

Citation: WANG Xiaohu,LIU Xiaoju. Moxifloxacin versus Levofloxacin for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2012, 12(6): 694-699. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20120113 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Sedative Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol on Postoperative Patients in ICU: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Efficacy and Safety of Trimetazidine for Stable Angina Pectoris: A Systematic Review