1. |
Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 110(5): 1091-1095.
|
2. |
Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 198(1): 34 -37.
|
3. |
Clayton RD. Hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2006, 20(1): 73-87.
|
4. |
Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gyneco Surg, 1989, (5): 213-216.
|
5. |
Reich H. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 19(4): 337-344.
|
6. |
Reich H, Roberts L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in current gynecological practice. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice, 2003, (3): 32-40.
|
7. |
Johns DA, Carrera B, Jones J, et al. The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 6(172): 1715-1719.
|
8. |
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006, (2): CD003677.
|
9. |
Brill AI. Hysterectomy in the 21st century: different approaches, different challenges. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 49(4): 722-735.
|
10. |
Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ, 2004, 328(7432): 129.
|
11. |
Englund M, Robson S. Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14(6): 724-728.
|
12. |
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 2005, 330(7506): 1478.
|
13. |
Kluivers, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008, 136(1): 3-8.
|
14. |
Raju KS, Auld BJ. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1994, 101(12): 1068-1071.
|
15. |
Kunz G, Plath T, Leyendecker G. [Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. Technique and results]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 1996, 56(9): 453-457.
|
16. |
Langebrekke A, Eraker R, Nesheim BI, et al. Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal. A prospective randomised study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1996, 75(4): 404-407.
|
17. |
Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M, et al. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996, 103(4): 345-350.
|
18. |
Ellström M, Olsén MF, Olsson JH, et al. Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1998, 77(9): 923-928.
|
19. |
Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Steege JF, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 92(3): 321-326.
|
20. |
Yuen PM, Mak TW, Yim SF, et al. Metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 179(1): 1-5.
|
21. |
Falcone T, Paraiso MF, Mascha E. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 180(4): 955-962.
|
22. |
Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 180(2 Pt 1): 270-275.
|
23. |
Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14(12): 2996-2999.
|
24. |
Ferrari M, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, et al. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. BJOG, 2000, 107(5):620-625.
|
25. |
Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Toivonen J, et al. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2000, 79(10): 866-871.
|
26. |
Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R, et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG, 2000, 107(11): 1386-1391.
|
27. |
Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG, 2000, 107(11): 1380-1385.
|
28. |
Hwang JL, Seow KM, Tsai YL, et al. Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002, 81(12): 1132-1138.
|
29. |
Schutz K, Possover M, Merker A, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 g. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(1): 121-125.
|
30. |
Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Vianello F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2002, 9(3): 333-338.
|
31. |
Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, et al. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003, 83(1): 37-43.
|
32. |
Tsai EM, Chen HS, Long CY, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2003, 55(2): 105-109.
|
33. |
Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, et al. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG, 2006, 113(9): 1023-1030.
|
34. |
Kluivers KB, Mol BW, Bremer GL, et al. Pelvic organ function in randomized patients undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14(4): 442-448.
|
35. |
Garry R, PG. How safe is the laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy? Gynaecological Endoscopy, 1995, 4: 77-79.
|
36. |
Härkki-Sirén P, Sjöberg J, Mäkinen J, et al. Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: a review and complications of 1165 operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 176(1 Pt 1): 118-122.
|
37. |
Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2002, 9(3): 339-345.
|
38. |
Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14(2): 145-152.
|
39. |
Chien P, Khan K, Mol BW. How to interpret the findings of the eVALuate study. BJOG, 2005, 112(4): 391-393.
|
40. |
Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, et al. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery, 2008, 143(2): 206-215.
|