• 1. Graduate School, Luzhou Medical College, Luzhou 646000, China;2. Department of Cardiology, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610031, China;
CAI Lin, Email: cailinwm@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of safflor yellow for unstable angina.
Methods 
 Relevant studies of safflor yellow for unstable angina were collected from databases including CENTRAL (Issue 4, 2012), MEDLINE, EMbase, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM from January, 2007 to December, 2012. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software.
Results  A total of 6 RCTs involving 533 patients were included, which were of low quality. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with conventional treatment alone, safflor yellow plus routine biomedical treatment significantly improved the symptoms f angina (excellence: OR=2.34, 95%CI 1.79 to 4.87; effectiveness: OR=1.23, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.76). Besides, it significantly improved ECG outcomes (excellence: OR=1.85, 95%CI 1.29 to 2.64; effectiveness: OR=1.43, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.05), obviously improved the hemorheology index and blood lipid, reduced plasma homocysteine concentration, and increased the decreasing of nitroglycerin stop amount. No damage of the liver and kidney were reported.
Conclusion  Current evidence showed that, safflor yellow plus routine biomedical treatment is effective in the treatment of unstable angina, which is superior to routine biomedical treatment alone. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality, double blind, randomized controlled trials are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Citation: YANG Mengmeng,LI Jin,WANG Han,CAI Lin. Effectiveness and Safety of Safflor Yellow for Unstable Angina: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(8): 971-977. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20130169 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Carvedilol versus Metoprolol for Primary Hypertension: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis