• Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
LIHong, Email: wzwzlwww@qq.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of flibanserin for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2014), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from their inception to August 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness and safety of flibanserin for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. And then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 3 881 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with the placebo group, the flibanserin group was superior in increasing the number of satisfying sexual events (SSE) (MD=0.72, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.92, P<0.000 01), improving the eDiary desire score (MD=2.21, 95%CI 1.45 to 2.97, P<0.000 01), FSFI domain score (MD=0.29, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.35, P<0.01) and FSFI total score (MD=1.82, 95%CI 1.47 to 2.17, P<0.000 01), and decreasing the FSDS-R item 13 score (MD=-0.24, 95%CI -0.31 to -0.17, P<0.000 01) and FSDS-R total score (MD=-2.70, 95%CI -3.43 to -1.96, P<0.000 01). However, the incidence of adverse events in the flibanserin group was higher than that of the placebo group (OR=1.31, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.54, P=0.001). Conclusion The current evidence suggests that, in premenopausal women with HSDD, flibanserin treatment is effective but may increase the incidence of adverse events.

Citation: DENGTuo, CAIXiang, TIANYe, LIAOBang-hua, LUODe-yi, MENGYang, WANGKun-jie, LIHong. Efficacy and Safety of Flibanserin for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Premenopausal Women: A Meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015, 15(5): 565-572. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20150094 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Arthroscopic Double-bundle versus Single-bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Lamivudine plus Adefovir Combination Therapy versus Entecavir Monotherapy for Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B: A Meta-analysis