A Survey on Awareness of the ARRIVE Guideline and GSPC in Researchers Field in Animal Experiments Field in Lanzhou City_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 FANGZe-ping ¹ , LENGXi ¹ ,  LIUYa-li ² , LIUWen-bo ² , HUWen-jie ³ , ZHANGZheng-jing ⁴ , MABin ² , LIDong-mei ⁵

1. School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Pathogenic Biology Department, Jining Medical College Jining 272067, China;
4. Gansu Province Health School, Lanzhou 730000, China;
5. Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China;

Corresponding author：

LIUYa-li, Email: lyl_201006@126.com

Keywords：

ARRIVE guideline; GSPC; Awareness rate; Survey

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20150135

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To investigate the awareness situation on the ARRIVE guideline and the Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) of animal experiments in researchers in animal experiments field in Lanzhou city, in order to improve the promotion of the two reporting guidelines in China. Methods A self-designed questionnaire was used to investigate the clinical graduate students and teachers in medical college in Lanzhou city. The investigation contents mainly included the basic information of the respondents, the awareness situation on the ARRIVE guideline, GSPC and other medical reporting guidelines. SPSS 21.0 software was used for data analysis. Results A total of 329 questionnaires (40 were from teachers and 289 were from graduate students) were issued, of which, 287 questionnaires were effective. The results showed that the awareness rate on the ARRIVE guideline and GSPC in clinical graduate students and teachers in medical college in Lanzhou city were 11.8% and 12.5%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between students and teachers in awareness rate (P=0.903). The survey approaches, the age, education, job, and the organization of the respondents were all not the influence factors of awareness rate (P>0.05). The respondents knew about the reporting guidelines mainly through the website (33.4%), related studies (21.2%) and academic reports (17.4%). Conclusion The awareness rate on the ARRIVE guideline and GSPC is relative low in researchers in animal experiments field in Lanzhou city, and it needed to take purposeful measures to promote and popularize them.

Citation： FANGZe-ping, LENGXi, LIUYa-li, LIUWen-bo, HUWen-jie, ZHANGZheng-jing, MABin, LIDong-mei. A Survey on Awareness of the ARRIVE Guideline and GSPC in Researchers Field in Animal Experiments Field in Lanzhou City. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015, 15(7): 797-801. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20150135 Copy

1.	熊玮,魏强,刘雪梅.动物实验研究的系统评价简介.中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(2):161-163,173.
2.	刘雅莉,张鹏,贺万斌,等.提高动物实验报告质量促进动物实验系统评价发展.中国循证儿科杂志,2011,6(3):233-236.
3.	李尧,谢琰臣.如何撰写规范的动物实验报告.中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2013,20(5):380-381.
4.	牛军强,王亚楠,朱芊各,等.动物实验方法学和报告质量评估工具的横断面研究.中国循证医学杂志,2015,15(2):223-229.
5.	Pound P,Roberts I.对动物实验进行系统评价的必要性.中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(1):3-5.
6.	曾宪涛,庄丽萍,杨宗国,等.Meta分析系列之七:非随机实验性研究、诊断性试验及动物实验的质量评价工具.中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(6):496-499.
7.	Kilkenny C,Browne W,Cuthill IC,et al.Animal research:reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2011,31(4):991-993.
8.	Hooijmans C,de Vries R,Leenaars M,et al.The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design,reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines.Lab Anim,2011,45(1):61.
9.	Kilkenny C,Browne WJ,Cuthill IC,et al.Improving Bioscience Research Reporting:The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research.PLoS Biol,2010,8(6):e1000412.
10.	Hooijmans CR,Leenaars M,Ritskes-Hoitinga M.A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies,to fully integrate the Three Rs,and to make systematic reviews more feasible.Altern Lab Anim,2010,38(2):167-182.
11.	Moher D,Schulz KF,Altman D.The CONSORT statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.JAMA,2001,285(15):1987-1991.
12.	Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Reprint--Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:The PRISMA Statement.Phys Ther,2009,89(9):873-880.
13.	刘玉秀,章丹,盛梅.随机对照试验Meta分析的统一报告格式:QUOROM声明.中国临床药理学与治疗学,2003,8(5):591-595.
14.	von Elm E,Altman DG,Egger M,et al.Strengthening the Repo rting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies.BMJ,2007,335(7624):806-808.
15.	MacPherson H,Altman DG,Hammerschlag R,et al.针刺临床试验干预措施报告标准修订版:CONSORT声明的扩展.中国循证医学杂志,2010,10(10):1228-1239.
16.	Mcgrath JC,Drummond GB,Mclachlan EM,et al.Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals:the ARRIVE guidelines.Br J Pharmacol,2010,160(7):1573-1576.
17.	刘雪梅,张凌之,李幼平,等.我国医学期刊实施发表伦理举措之一:应用报告指南.中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):759-762.
18.	Li XQ,Tao KM,Zhou QH,et al.Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high-impact medical journals in China:A survey of instructions for authors and published papers.PLoS One,2012,7(2):e30683.
19.	19王小琴,韦当,刘雅莉,等.PRISMA声明应用现状调查.中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(9):1160-1164.
20.	National Centre for the Replacement,Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.ARRIVE guidelines.Available at:http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357.
21.	杜亮,陈耀龙,陈敏,等.从CONSORT到GPP:医学研究报告规范简介.编辑学报,2008,20(4):367-370.

1. 熊玮,魏强,刘雪梅.动物实验研究的系统评价简介.中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(2):161-163,173.
2. 刘雅莉,张鹏,贺万斌,等.提高动物实验报告质量促进动物实验系统评价发展.中国循证儿科杂志,2011,6(3):233-236.
3. 李尧,谢琰臣.如何撰写规范的动物实验报告.中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2013,20(5):380-381.
4. 牛军强,王亚楠,朱芊各,等.动物实验方法学和报告质量评估工具的横断面研究.中国循证医学杂志,2015,15(2):223-229.
5. Pound P,Roberts I.对动物实验进行系统评价的必要性.中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(1):3-5.
6. 曾宪涛,庄丽萍,杨宗国,等.Meta分析系列之七:非随机实验性研究、诊断性试验及动物实验的质量评价工具.中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(6):496-499.
7. Kilkenny C,Browne W,Cuthill IC,et al.Animal research:reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2011,31(4):991-993.
8. Hooijmans C,de Vries R,Leenaars M,et al.The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design,reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines.Lab Anim,2011,45(1):61.
9. Kilkenny C,Browne WJ,Cuthill IC,et al.Improving Bioscience Research Reporting:The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research.PLoS Biol,2010,8(6):e1000412.
10. Hooijmans CR,Leenaars M,Ritskes-Hoitinga M.A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies,to fully integrate the Three Rs,and to make systematic reviews more feasible.Altern Lab Anim,2010,38(2):167-182.
11. Moher D,Schulz KF,Altman D.The CONSORT statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.JAMA,2001,285(15):1987-1991.
12. Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Reprint--Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:The PRISMA Statement.Phys Ther,2009,89(9):873-880.
13. 刘玉秀,章丹,盛梅.随机对照试验Meta分析的统一报告格式:QUOROM声明.中国临床药理学与治疗学,2003,8(5):591-595.
14. von Elm E,Altman DG,Egger M,et al.Strengthening the Repo rting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies.BMJ,2007,335(7624):806-808.
15. MacPherson H,Altman DG,Hammerschlag R,et al.针刺临床试验干预措施报告标准修订版:CONSORT声明的扩展.中国循证医学杂志,2010,10(10):1228-1239.
16. Mcgrath JC,Drummond GB,Mclachlan EM,et al.Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals:the ARRIVE guidelines.Br J Pharmacol,2010,160(7):1573-1576.
17. 刘雪梅,张凌之,李幼平,等.我国医学期刊实施发表伦理举措之一:应用报告指南.中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):759-762.
18. Li XQ,Tao KM,Zhou QH,et al.Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high-impact medical journals in China:A survey of instructions for authors and published papers.PLoS One,2012,7(2):e30683.
19. 19王小琴,韦当,刘雅莉,等.PRISMA声明应用现状调查.中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(9):1160-1164.
20. National Centre for the Replacement,Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.ARRIVE guidelines.Available at:http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357.
21. 杜亮,陈耀龙,陈敏,等.从CONSORT到GPP:医学研究报告规范简介.编辑学报,2008,20(4):367-370.

Previous Article
A Survey and Influence Factors Analysis for Activity of Daily Living Conditions of Hospitalized Elderly Patients
Next Article
An Evidence-based Evaluation on Orphan Drug Policies

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

A Survey on Awareness of the ARRIVE Guideline and GSPC in Researchers Field in Animal Experiments Field in Lanzhou City

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content