Advancement of Registry Study for Clinical Application of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 ZENGZhi-yu ^1,2 , LINNa ^3,4 , ZHANGMing-dong ² , ZHANGShu ³ ,  WUMing ¹

1. School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. Boston Scientific China, Shanghai 200023, China;
3. Center for Arrhythmias, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing 100037, China;
4. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias, Beijing 100037, China;

Corresponding author：

WUMing, Email: w_ming@126.com

Keywords：

Registries; Defibrillators Implantable; Advancement

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20150223

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Large sample-size registries have become a necessary complement to randomized controlled trials. This study introduced the registries in the field of clinical application of implantable cardioverter defibrillator, especially the two large registries of the US NCDR ICD and Boston Scientifićs ALTITUDE, described the current status and future direction, thus to guide such registry researches in China.

Citation： ZENGZhi-yu, LINNa, ZHANGMing-dong, ZHANGShu, WUMing. Advancement of Registry Study for Clinical Application of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015, 15(11): 1362-1364. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20150223 Copy

1.	Hammill S, Phurrough S, Brindis R. The National ICD Registry:now and into the future. Heart Rhythm, 2006, 3(4):470-473.
2.	张澍, 林娜. 重视注册研究, 展现数据力量-美国NCDR ICD注册的启示. 中华心律失常学杂志, 2013, 17(5):325-326, 370.
3.	Al-Khatib SM, Hellkamp A, Curtis J, et al. Non-evidence-based ICD implantations in the United States. JAMA, 2011, 305(1):43-49.
4.	Kaiser DW, Tsai V, Heidenreich PA, et al. Defibrillator Implantations for Primary Prevention in the United States: Inappropriate Care or Inadequate Documentation? Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data ICD RegistryTM. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(10):2086-2093.
5.	Dewland TA, Pellegrini CN, Wang Y, et al. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58(10):1007-1013.
6.	Peterson PN, Varosy PD, Heidenreich PA, et al. Association of single-vs dual-chamber ICDs with mortality, readmissions, and complications among patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention. JAMA, 2013, 309(19):2025-2034.
7.	曾治宇, 于鹏, 张逸群, 等. 真实世界的精彩-来自ALTITUDE临床科学项目的启示. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2013, 27(1):5-7.
8.	Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Gilliam FR, et al. Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device followup:The ALTITUDE Survival Study. Circulation, 2010, 122(23): 2359-2367.
9.	Gilliam FR, Hayes DL, Boehmer JP, et al. Real world evaluation of dual-zone icd and crt-d programming compared to single-zone programming:The ALTITUDE REDUCES Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2011, 22(9):1023-1029.
10.	Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, et al. Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality through ICD Programming. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(24):2275-2283.
11.	Hsu JC, Saxon LA, Jones PW, et al. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single-vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead:Insights from the ALTITUDE Study. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(8):1770-1775.
12.	Powell BD, Saxon LA, Boehmer JP, et al. Survival after shock therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients according to rhythm shocked. The ALTITUDE survival by rhythm study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(18):1674-1679.
13.	Cha Y-M, Hayes DL, Asirvatham SJ, et al. Impact of shock energy and ventricular rhythm on the success of first shock therapy:the ALTITUDE first shock study. Heart Rhythm, 2013, 10(5):702-708.
14.	Powell BD, Asirvatham SJ, Perschbacher DL, et al. Noise, artifact, and oversensing related inappropriate ICD shock evaluation: ALTITUDE noise study. PACE, 2012, 35(7):863-869.
15.	Messenger JC, Ho KKL, Young CH, et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief:the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(16):1484-1488.
16.	Ezzat VA, Lee V, Ahsan S, et al. A systematic review of ICD complications in randomised controlled trials versus registries:is our "real-world" data an underestimation? Open Heart, 2015, 2(1): e000198-e000198.
17.	Akar JG, Bao H, Jones P, et al. Use of remote monitoring of newly implanted cardioverter-defibrillators:insights from the patient related determinants of ICD remote monitoring (PREDICT RM) study. Circulation, 2013, 128(22):2372-2383.
18.	Akar JG, Bao H, Jones P, et al. Use of Remote Monitoring Is Associated with Lower Risk of Adverse Outcomes Among Patients with Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2015, 8(5):1173-1180.
19.	Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(17):1587-1597.

1. Hammill S, Phurrough S, Brindis R. The National ICD Registry:now and into the future. Heart Rhythm, 2006, 3(4):470-473.
2. 张澍, 林娜. 重视注册研究, 展现数据力量-美国NCDR ICD注册的启示. 中华心律失常学杂志, 2013, 17(5):325-326, 370.
3. Al-Khatib SM, Hellkamp A, Curtis J, et al. Non-evidence-based ICD implantations in the United States. JAMA, 2011, 305(1):43-49.
4. Kaiser DW, Tsai V, Heidenreich PA, et al. Defibrillator Implantations for Primary Prevention in the United States: Inappropriate Care or Inadequate Documentation? Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data ICD RegistryTM. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(10):2086-2093.
5. Dewland TA, Pellegrini CN, Wang Y, et al. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58(10):1007-1013.
6. Peterson PN, Varosy PD, Heidenreich PA, et al. Association of single-vs dual-chamber ICDs with mortality, readmissions, and complications among patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention. JAMA, 2013, 309(19):2025-2034.
7. 曾治宇, 于鹏, 张逸群, 等. 真实世界的精彩-来自ALTITUDE临床科学项目的启示. 中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志, 2013, 27(1):5-7.
8. Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Gilliam FR, et al. Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device followup:The ALTITUDE Survival Study. Circulation, 2010, 122(23): 2359-2367.
9. Gilliam FR, Hayes DL, Boehmer JP, et al. Real world evaluation of dual-zone icd and crt-d programming compared to single-zone programming:The ALTITUDE REDUCES Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2011, 22(9):1023-1029.
10. Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, et al. Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality through ICD Programming. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(24):2275-2283.
11. Hsu JC, Saxon LA, Jones PW, et al. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single-vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead:Insights from the ALTITUDE Study. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(8):1770-1775.
12. Powell BD, Saxon LA, Boehmer JP, et al. Survival after shock therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients according to rhythm shocked. The ALTITUDE survival by rhythm study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(18):1674-1679.
13. Cha Y-M, Hayes DL, Asirvatham SJ, et al. Impact of shock energy and ventricular rhythm on the success of first shock therapy:the ALTITUDE first shock study. Heart Rhythm, 2013, 10(5):702-708.
14. Powell BD, Asirvatham SJ, Perschbacher DL, et al. Noise, artifact, and oversensing related inappropriate ICD shock evaluation: ALTITUDE noise study. PACE, 2012, 35(7):863-869.
15. Messenger JC, Ho KKL, Young CH, et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief:the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(16):1484-1488.
16. Ezzat VA, Lee V, Ahsan S, et al. A systematic review of ICD complications in randomised controlled trials versus registries:is our "real-world" data an underestimation? Open Heart, 2015, 2(1): e000198-e000198.
17. Akar JG, Bao H, Jones P, et al. Use of remote monitoring of newly implanted cardioverter-defibrillators:insights from the patient related determinants of ICD remote monitoring (PREDICT RM) study. Circulation, 2013, 128(22):2372-2383.
18. Akar JG, Bao H, Jones P, et al. Use of Remote Monitoring Is Associated with Lower Risk of Adverse Outcomes Among Patients with Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2015, 8(5):1173-1180.
19. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(17):1587-1597.

Previous Article
A Survey on Medical Students' Professional Ethics Education in Chengdu

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Advancement of Registry Study for Clinical Application of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Format

Content