1. |
Mulrow CD. The medical review article:state of the science. Ann Intern Med, 1987, 106(3):485-488.
|
2. |
Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol, 1995, 48(1):167-171.
|
3. |
Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews:synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med, 1997, 126(5):376-380.
|
4. |
Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr, 2002, 2(2):1-3.
|
5. |
Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, et al. Systematic reviews and meta analyses on treatment of asthma:critical evaluation. BMJ, 2000, 321(7256):537-540.
|
6. |
Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analysis:a comparison of Cochrane paper-based journals. JAMA, 1998, 280(3):278-280.
|
7. |
Schlosser RW, Goetze H. Effectiveness and treatment validity of interventions addressing self-injurious behavior:From narrative reviews to meta-analyses. Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, 1992, 7:135-175.
|
8. |
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991, 44(11):1271-1278.
|
9. |
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Singer J, Goldsmith CH, et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991, 44(1):91-98.
|
10. |
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2007, 7:10.
|
11. |
Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 62(10):1013-1020.
|
12. |
Sacks HS, Berrier J, Reitman D, et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med, 1987, 316(8):450-455.
|
13. |
Kung J, Chiappelli F, Cajulis OO, et al. From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based health care:validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (R-AMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance. Open Dent J, 2010, 4:84-91.
|
14. |
Pieper D, Buechter RB, Li L, et al. Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R (evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 68(5):574-583.
|
15. |
Pieper D, Mathes T, Eikermann M. Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies? BMC Res Notes, 2014, 7:609.
|
16. |
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al. ROBIS group, ROBIS:A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol, 2015, S0895-4356(15)00308-X.
|
17. |
Hopp L. Risk of bias reporting in Cochrane systematic reviews. International journal of nursing practice. Int J Nurs Pract, 2015, 21(5):683-686.
|
18. |
Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med, 2010, 7(2):e1000217.
|
19. |
H.A. Linstone, M. Turoff. The Delphi method:Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, 1975.
|
20. |
Chandler J, Churchill R, Higgins J, et al. Methodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
|
21. |
Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day:how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med, 2010, 7(9):e1000326.
|
22. |
熊俊, 陈日新. 系统评价/Meta分析方法学质量的评价工具 AMSTAR. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(9):1084-1089.
|
23. |
Whiting P, Savovic J, Higgins J, et al. ROBIS:Tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews Guidance on how to use ROBIS. Available at:http://www.robis-tool.info/.
|