The Citation Status of Systematic Reviews on Imaging Diagnosis in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-sectional Study_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 WANGMeng-shu ¹ ^# , LILe ² ^# , ZHANGHong-xia ³ , LIRui ³ , CHANGXiao-nan ² , DULiang ⁴ , YANGKe-hu ^5,6,7 ,  LEIJun-qiang ¹ , PEICai-xia ¹ , CHENYao-long ^5,6,7

1. The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
4. Chinese Evidence-based Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
5. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
6. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China;
7. Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;

Corresponding author：

LEIJun-qiang, Email: leijq1990@163.com

Keywords：

Imaging diagnosis; Systematic review; Citation analysis; Clinical practice guideline

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20160053

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To investigate the citation status of systematic reviews on imaging diagnosis in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and provide reference for the development of Chinese imaging diagnosis guidelines. Methods We electronically searched PubMed databases to collect systematic reviews on imaging diagnosis. The date was limited from January 1st 2010 to December 31th 2012. Two reviewers independently screened literature and extracted data. The citation data of included systematic reviews were obtained on the Web of Science. Citation analysis method was used to analyze the citation frequency of systematic reviews on imaging diagnosis in CPGs. Results 292 systematic reviews on imaging diagnosis were included, of which 94% (275/292) were indexed by Science Citation Index. The total citation frequency of these systematic reviews was 5413 (medium:20, range:0 to 131). 28% (78/275) were cited by CPGs. Of which, 7% (19/275) were used as the source of the evidence of recommendations in CPGs. Conclusion The ratio of systematic reviews cited by CPGs is low, the ratio of being the source of evidence of recommendations of systematic reviews in CPGs is lower, and furthermore, the citation is time-delayed.

Citation： WANGMeng-shu, LILe, ZHANGHong-xia, LIRui, CHANGXiao-nan, DULiang, YANGKe-hu, LEIJun-qiang, PEICai-xia, CHENYao-long. The Citation Status of Systematic Reviews on Imaging Diagnosis in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-sectional Study. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(3): 341-347. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160053 Copy

1.	IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clinical practice guidelines:directions for a new program. Washington, DC:National Academy Press; 1990.
2.	IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press, 2011.
3.	http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx.
4.	Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2:a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8):529-536.
5.	Biesheuvel CJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Distraction from randomization in diagnostic research. Ann Epidemiol, 2006, 16:540-544.
6.	Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. GRADE:assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. Evid Based Med, 2008, 13(6):162-163.
7.	Willis BH, Quigley M. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research:a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2011, 11:163.
8.	徐俊峰, 葛龙, 安妮, 等. 中国大陆学者发表诊断性试验系统评价现状分析. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2013, 8(5):388-390.
9.	Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy:the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem, 2003, 49(1):1-6.
10.	Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy:explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(1):7-18.
11.	Wang J, Welch K, Wang L, et al. Negative Predictive Value of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Stage T1-2N0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer:A Meta-Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer, 2012, 13(2):81-89.
12.	Chen J, Yang R, Lu Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion:a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2012, 138(9):1433-1441.
13.	Aboumarzouk OM, Ogston S, Huang Z, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal elastosonography (TRES) imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2012, 110(10):1414-1423.
14.	Hariharan D, Constantinides V, Kocher HM, et al. The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases:a meta-analysis. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(1):84-92.
15.	Sun Z, Almutairi AMD. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis:a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 73(2):266-273.
16.	Fihn S D, Gardin J M, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation, 2012, 126(25):e354-e471.
17.	Romero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W, et al. CMR Imaging Assessing Viability in Patients With Chronic Ventricular Dysfunction Due to Coronary Artery Disease A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 5(5):494-508.
18.	Yoon YE, Yoo Jin H, Hyung-Kwan K, et al. 2014 Korean Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging:A Joint Report of the Korean Society of Cardiology and the Korean Society of Radiology. Korean Circ J, 2014, 44(6):359-385.
19.	Michèle H, Georges F, Guillaume N, et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2010, 12(21):1-10.
20.	Samad Z, Hakeem A, Mahmood S, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19(2):364-376.
21.	Jin K Y, Yong H S, Mok K S, et al. Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol, 2015, 16(2):251-285.
22.	Ganesh A, Muzzmal H, Lakshmanan J. Multi-detector computerized tomography angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain——a meta analysis and systematic review of literature. Int J Cardiol, 2010, 141(2):132-140.
23.	Bossaert L, O'Connor RE, Arntz HR, et al. Part 9:Acute coronary syndromes:2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation, 2010, 122(16 Suppl 2):e175-212.
24.	Sudhin T, Manigandan C, Andrew T, et al. Cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers in neonatal encephalopathy:a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2010, 125(2):e382.
25.	Toshiki Takenouchi, Osuke Iwata, Makoto Nabetani T, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy:JSPNM & MHLW Japan Working Group Practice Guidelines Consensus Statement from the Working Group on Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW), Japan, and Japan Society for Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine (JSPNM). Brain Dev, 2012 34(2):165-170.
26.	Salavati A, Radmanesh F, Heidari K, et al. Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease:systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2012, 6(2):78-90.
27.	De LS, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis:a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23(5):367-374.
28.	Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease:Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis, 2013, 7(7):556-585.
29.	Xu W, Shi J, Zeng X, et al. EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes:a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011, 74(5):1001-1009.
30.	Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography.Part 2:Clinical Applications. Ultraschall Med, 2013, 34(3):238-253.
31.	Razi K, Ik-Kyung J. Evaluation of coronary allograft vasculopathy using multi-detector row computed tomography:a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 41(2):415-422.
32.	Brennan M E, Houssami N. Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast, 2012, 21(2):112-123.
33.	Tozaki M, Isomoto I, Kojima Y, et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline for screening and imaging diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer, 2015, 22(1):28-36.
34.	Tasian G E, Copp HL. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in nonpalpable cryptorchidism:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2011, 127(1):119-128.
35.	Kolon TF, Herndon CDA, Baker LA, et al. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism:AUA guideline. J Urol, 2014, 192(2):337-345.
36.	Dighe S, Purkayastha S, Swift I, et al. Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers:a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65(9):708-719.
37.	van de Velde CJ, Boelens PG, Borras JM, et al. EURECCA colorectal:multidisciplinary management:European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer, 2014, 50(1):1.e1-1.e34.
38.	Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(3):187-198.
39.	Menke J. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia:systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology, 2010, 256(1):93-101.
40.	Brandt LJ, Paul F, Longstreth GF, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline:Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Patterns of Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Colon Ischemia (CI). Am J Gastroenterol, 2015, 110(1):18-44.
41.	Mahajan N, Polavaram L,Vankayala H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease:a comparative meta-analysis. Heart, 2010, 96(12):956-966.
42.	Giuseppe M, Robert F, Krzysztof N, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension:the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(28):1099-1105.
43.	Hudelist G, English J, Thomas A E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis:systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(3):257-263.
44.	Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline:Management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(3):400-412.
45.	Yan X, Yulia B, Ross MI, et al. Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients:a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2011, 103(2):129-142.
46.	Pflugfelder A, Kochs C, Blum A, et al. S3-Guideline "Diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma"——short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 2013, 11(6):563-602.
47.	Carrabba N, Schuijf JD, Graaf FRD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis:a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol, 2010, 17(3):470-478.
48.	Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009, 62(10):1013-1020.
49.	Bunch AM. A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as Compared With Coronary Calcium Scoring in Alternative Noninvasive Technique in Detecting Coronary Artery Disease and Evaluating Acute Coronary Syndrome in an Acute Care Setting. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2012, 31(2):73-83.
50.	Fusar-Poli P. Voxel-wise meta-analysis of fMRI studies in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 2012, 37(2):106-112.
51.	Nina B, Lisa H, Ben V, et al. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59(7):697-703.
52.	陈耀龙, 元博, 孙丽娜, 等. 中国大陆临床实践指南引文分析. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2013, 8(6):467-470.

1. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clinical practice guidelines:directions for a new program. Washington, DC:National Academy Press; 1990.
2. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press, 2011.
3. http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx.
4. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2:a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8):529-536.
5. Biesheuvel CJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Distraction from randomization in diagnostic research. Ann Epidemiol, 2006, 16:540-544.
6. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. GRADE:assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. Evid Based Med, 2008, 13(6):162-163.
7. Willis BH, Quigley M. The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research:a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2011, 11:163.
8. 徐俊峰, 葛龙, 安妮, 等. 中国大陆学者发表诊断性试验系统评价现状分析. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2013, 8(5):388-390.
9. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy:the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem, 2003, 49(1):1-6.
10. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy:explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(1):7-18.
11. Wang J, Welch K, Wang L, et al. Negative Predictive Value of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Stage T1-2N0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer:A Meta-Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer, 2012, 13(2):81-89.
12. Chen J, Yang R, Lu Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion:a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2012, 138(9):1433-1441.
13. Aboumarzouk OM, Ogston S, Huang Z, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal elastosonography (TRES) imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2012, 110(10):1414-1423.
14. Hariharan D, Constantinides V, Kocher HM, et al. The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases:a meta-analysis. Am J Surg, 2012, 204(1):84-92.
15. Sun Z, Almutairi AMD. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis:a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 73(2):266-273.
16. Fihn S D, Gardin J M, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation, 2012, 126(25):e354-e471.
17. Romero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W, et al. CMR Imaging Assessing Viability in Patients With Chronic Ventricular Dysfunction Due to Coronary Artery Disease A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 5(5):494-508.
18. Yoon YE, Yoo Jin H, Hyung-Kwan K, et al. 2014 Korean Guidelines for Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging:A Joint Report of the Korean Society of Cardiology and the Korean Society of Radiology. Korean Circ J, 2014, 44(6):359-385.
19. Michèle H, Georges F, Guillaume N, et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2010, 12(21):1-10.
20. Samad Z, Hakeem A, Mahmood S, et al. A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19(2):364-376.
21. Jin K Y, Yong H S, Mok K S, et al. Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol, 2015, 16(2):251-285.
22. Ganesh A, Muzzmal H, Lakshmanan J. Multi-detector computerized tomography angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain——a meta analysis and systematic review of literature. Int J Cardiol, 2010, 141(2):132-140.
23. Bossaert L, O'Connor RE, Arntz HR, et al. Part 9:Acute coronary syndromes:2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation, 2010, 122(16 Suppl 2):e175-212.
24. Sudhin T, Manigandan C, Andrew T, et al. Cerebral magnetic resonance biomarkers in neonatal encephalopathy:a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2010, 125(2):e382.
25. Toshiki Takenouchi, Osuke Iwata, Makoto Nabetani T, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy:JSPNM & MHLW Japan Working Group Practice Guidelines Consensus Statement from the Working Group on Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW), Japan, and Japan Society for Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine (JSPNM). Brain Dev, 2012 34(2):165-170.
26. Salavati A, Radmanesh F, Heidari K, et al. Dual-source computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease:systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2012, 6(2):78-90.
27. De LS, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis:a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23(5):367-374.
28. Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease:Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis, 2013, 7(7):556-585.
29. Xu W, Shi J, Zeng X, et al. EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes:a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011, 74(5):1001-1009.
30. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography.Part 2:Clinical Applications. Ultraschall Med, 2013, 34(3):238-253.
31. Razi K, Ik-Kyung J. Evaluation of coronary allograft vasculopathy using multi-detector row computed tomography:a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 41(2):415-422.
32. Brennan M E, Houssami N. Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast, 2012, 21(2):112-123.
33. Tozaki M, Isomoto I, Kojima Y, et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline for screening and imaging diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer, 2015, 22(1):28-36.
34. Tasian G E, Copp HL. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in nonpalpable cryptorchidism:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2011, 127(1):119-128.
35. Kolon TF, Herndon CDA, Baker LA, et al. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism:AUA guideline. J Urol, 2014, 192(2):337-345.
36. Dighe S, Purkayastha S, Swift I, et al. Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers:a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65(9):708-719.
37. van de Velde CJ, Boelens PG, Borras JM, et al. EURECCA colorectal:multidisciplinary management:European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer, 2014, 50(1):1.e1-1.e34.
38. Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(3):187-198.
39. Menke J. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia:systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology, 2010, 256(1):93-101.
40. Brandt LJ, Paul F, Longstreth GF, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline:Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Patterns of Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Colon Ischemia (CI). Am J Gastroenterol, 2015, 110(1):18-44.
41. Mahajan N, Polavaram L,Vankayala H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease:a comparative meta-analysis. Heart, 2010, 96(12):956-966.
42. Giuseppe M, Robert F, Krzysztof N, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension:the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 2013, 34(28):1099-1105.
43. Hudelist G, English J, Thomas A E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis:systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(3):257-263.
44. Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline:Management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(3):400-412.
45. Yan X, Yulia B, Ross MI, et al. Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients:a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2011, 103(2):129-142.
46. Pflugfelder A, Kochs C, Blum A, et al. S3-Guideline "Diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma"——short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 2013, 11(6):563-602.
47. Carrabba N, Schuijf JD, Graaf FRD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis:a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol, 2010, 17(3):470-478.
48. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009, 62(10):1013-1020.
49. Bunch AM. A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as Compared With Coronary Calcium Scoring in Alternative Noninvasive Technique in Detecting Coronary Artery Disease and Evaluating Acute Coronary Syndrome in an Acute Care Setting. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2012, 31(2):73-83.
50. Fusar-Poli P. Voxel-wise meta-analysis of fMRI studies in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 2012, 37(2):106-112.
51. Nina B, Lisa H, Ben V, et al. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2006, 59(7):697-703.
52. 陈耀龙, 元博, 孙丽娜, 等. 中国大陆临床实践指南引文分析. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2013, 8(6):467-470.

Previous Article
Efficacy of Telephone-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Meta-analysis
Next Article
The Search Strategy of Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Animal Research: A Survey

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

The Citation Status of Systematic Reviews on Imaging Diagnosis in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-sectional Study

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content