• 1. Center for Health Policy and Management, Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China;
  • 2. Institute of Medical Information, Peking Union Medical College/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To systematically review indicators and methods of quality assessment for primary health care, to provide empirical evidence for quality improvement in this area. Methods  We electronically searched databases including Proquest Dissertations and Theses, ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, EMbase, IDEAS, Jstor, SSRN, Popline and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2014) and network resources on World Bank, World Health Organization and Google from inception to April 2014. Empirical studies about quality assessment of primary care system, organization and personnel were collected. Data was extracted using pre-designed form for qualitative analysis and description. Results  A total of 59 studies were included. The quality assessment for primary health care in practice was mainly from four dimensions: (1) emphasize on the implementation of such basic characteristics of primary health care as first contact, coordination, comprehensiveness and continuous; (2) focus on the evaluation of primary care contents, such as basic medical care, preventive care, chronic diseases, etc.; (3) based on the structure, process and outcome quality proposed by Donabedian; (4) emphasize on patients’ perceived quality. Seven relevant tools were widely used in the process of quality assessment in practice. Conclusion  The majority of included studies were from developed countries while such empirical studies lacked in developing countries. Included studies varied in the connotation and angel of the primary health care quality, among which, the GPAS (General Practice Assessment Survey) used for evaluating pati ent perceived quality and PCAT (Primary Care Assessment Tools) used for evaluating the basic characteristics of primary care were widely used.

Citation: YUANSha-sha, WANGFang, HENGChi, YANGTing, LIChen-chen. Quality Assessment for Primary Health Care in Practice: A Descriptive Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(6): 719-729. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160111 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy of Salbutamol for Infants Bronchiolitis: A Meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Introduction and Explanation of the Updated Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD 2015)