• Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yongchuan 402160, China;
SHENXue-yuan, Email: sxy1965@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. Methods We searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2016), EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to April 2016, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing single-incision VATS and conventional multiple ports VATS for lung cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 9 cohort studies involving 1 318 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the conventional multiple ports VATS group, the single-incision VATS group had shorter chest drainage time (MD=-0.70, 95%CI -1.38 to -0.02, P=0.04), shorter hospital stay (MD=-0.52, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.14, P=0.007), less amount of intraoperative bleeding (MD=-18.49, 95%CI -33.61 to -3.37, P=0.02), lower VAS score at 1 and 3 days after surgery (MD=-0.32, 95%CI -0.51 to -0.14, P=0.000 7; MD=-0.48, 95%CI -0.58 to -0.38, P < 0.000 01). Meanwhile, there were no statistical differences between both groups in operation time (MD=-3.40, 95%CI -13.65 to 6.85, P=0.52), the postoperative complications (OR=0.91, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.27, P=0.56), the number of lymph node dissection (MD=-0.79, 95%CI -2.35 to 0.77, P=0.32), the total cost (MD=0.47, 95%CI -0.39 to 1.32, P=0.28), the intraoperative conversion rate (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.93, P=0.82) and VAS score at 7 days after surgery (MD=-1.18, 95%CI -2.42 to 0.07, P=0.06). Conclusion Current evidence shows, single-incision VATS is superior in the surgical trauma to conventional multiple ports VATS in the treatment of lung cancer, However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Citation: HUANGGuo-gang, SHENXue-yuan. Single-incision Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery versus Conventional Multiple Ports Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(9): 1056-1063. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160162 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy and Safety of Hypofractionation Radiotherapy versus Conventional Whole Breast Radiotherapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer after Breast Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Myocardial Protection for On-pump CABG Patients: A Systematic Review