The Introduction of STARD 2015 for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 CHENXin-lin , HUYue , MOChuan-wei , XUQian , LIUXiao-qi , PENGDan-hong , WANGYan-ping ,  LIXian-tao

Basic Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China;

Corresponding author：

LIXian-tao, Email: lxt150@126.com

Keywords：

Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy; STARD statement; Diagnostic accuracy study; Reporting checklist; Diagram

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20160186

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy (STARD) was developed for guiding the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Its newest version was published in 2015. The study mainly introduced the checklist, terminology, and diagram of the STARD 2015. It is hoped that domestic researchers could use the STARD 2015 to guide the implementation and reporting of their diagnostic accuracy studies, so as to improve the reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Citation： CHENXin-lin, HUYue, MOChuan-wei, XUQian, LIUXiao-qi, PENGDan-hong, WANGYan-ping, LIXian-tao. The Introduction of STARD 2015 for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(10): 1227-1230. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160186 Copy

1.	张俊, 徐志伟, 李克. 诊断性试验Meta分析的效应指标评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(7): 890-895.
2.	Maclean EN, Stone IS, Ceelen F, et al. Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 15(6): 691-700.
3.	Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(1): 40-44.
4.	Patrick MB, Johannes BR, David EB, 等. 迈向完整、准确的诊断准确性研究报告: STARD计划. 中国循证医学杂志, 2006, 6(7): 523-528.
5.	王波，詹思延. 如何撰写高质量的流行病学研究论文第三讲诊断试验准确性研究的报告规范——STARD介绍. 中华流行病学杂志, 2006, 27(10): 909-912.
6.	严卫丽. 第五讲: 如何报告临床诊断准确性研究——国际报告规范STARD解读. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2010, 5(5): 386-389.
7.	Wilczynski NL, 马玲. 研究诊断准确性的论著的质量: STARD公布后无改变——STARD公布前后的比较研究. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2008, 31(6): 485.
8.	Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 826-832.
9.	Fidalgo BM, Crabb DP, Lawrenson JG. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015, 35(3): 315-323.

1. 张俊, 徐志伟, 李克. 诊断性试验Meta分析的效应指标评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2013, 13(7): 890-895.
2. Maclean EN, Stone IS, Ceelen F, et al. Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 15(6): 691-700.
3. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(1): 40-44.
4. Patrick MB, Johannes BR, David EB, 等. 迈向完整、准确的诊断准确性研究报告: STARD计划. 中国循证医学杂志, 2006, 6(7): 523-528.
5. 王波，詹思延. 如何撰写高质量的流行病学研究论文第三讲诊断试验准确性研究的报告规范——STARD介绍. 中华流行病学杂志, 2006, 27(10): 909-912.
6. 严卫丽. 第五讲: 如何报告临床诊断准确性研究——国际报告规范STARD解读. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2010, 5(5): 386-389.
7. Wilczynski NL, 马玲. 研究诊断准确性的论著的质量: STARD公布后无改变——STARD公布前后的比较研究. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2008, 31(6): 485.
8. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 826-832.
9. Fidalgo BM, Crabb DP, Lawrenson JG. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2015, 35(3): 315-323.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

The Introduction of STARD 2015 for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content