A Comparative Study on the Teaching Effectiveness between Patient based Problem-based Learning and Conventional Bedside Teaching_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 ZENGJing ¹ ,  ZUOChuan ¹ , QINGPing ² , WANGYi-ping ¹ , ZOUMing-ying ¹ , JIANGYong-dong ¹ , DENGBei ²

1. Department of Internal Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
2. Department of Educational Administration, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;

Corresponding author：

ZUOChuan, Email: neijiaoban@163.com

Keywords：

Eight-years Medical Program; Real patient problem-based learning; Conventional bedside teaching

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20160207

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To evaluate the teaching effect of Patient based Problem-Based Learning (PPBL) vs. conventional bedside teaching (CBT) instudents of eight years medical program. Method Six students of Eight years medical program in two grades from volunteer registration were randomized into PPBL group and the other students were recruited into CBT group. After one year study, the test score in module TBL test, written test in final exam and mutual score were evaluated to compare the teaching effect of two groups. Results The baseline of the two groups were matched when comparing their grades in Diagnoses Course. After trainee period, there were no significant differences between two groups of the test score in module TBL test, written test in final exam and mutual score. Conclusion The PPBL mode is not inferior to conventional bedside teaching. Furthermore, with advantage in developing the competency of communication, cooperation and manage the information, PPBL has its special value and should be popularized.

Citation： ZENGJing, ZUOChuan, QINGPing, WANGYi-ping, ZOUMing-ying, JIANGYong-dong, DENGBei. A Comparative Study on the Teaching Effectiveness between Patient based Problem-based Learning and Conventional Bedside Teaching. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(12): 1370-1373. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160207 Copy

1.	Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula:theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ, 2000, 34(9):721-728.
2.	Colliver JA. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula:research and theory. Acad Med, 2000,75(3):259-266.
3.	Kamin C, Sullivan PO, Deterding R, et al. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med, 2003, 78(2):204-211.
4.	Diemers AD, vande Wiel MW, Scherpbier AJ, et al. Diagnostic reasoning and underlying knowledge of students with preclinical patient contacts in PBL. Med Educ, 2015, 49(12):1229-1238.
5.	曾静, 易群, 卿平, 等. 在八年制医学教育中进行系统整合课程体系改革的初步探索及反馈. 中国现代医学杂志, 2010, 20(22):3516-3519.
6.	曾静, 左川, 卿平, 等. 以 TBL 为核心建立系统整合课程考核体系的探索和思考. 中国高等医学教育, 2013, 26(10):69-70.
7.	Sisk RJ. Team-based learning:systematic research review. J Nurs Educ, 2011, 50(12):665-669.
8.	程念珍, 李映兰, 王曙红, 等. PBL教学模式在外科护理学实习教学中的应用. 中国现代医学杂志, 2011, 21(10):1271-1273.
9.	彭志行, 赵杨, 易洪刚. PBL教学模式在医学统计学教学中的应用. 中国高等医学教育, 2010, 23(3):79-81.
10.	Lai CS, Lu PY. A transformation of preclinical paper-based PBL to real patient-based PBL. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2009, 25(5):227-228.
11.	Dammers J, Spencer J, Thomas M. Using real patients in problem-based learning:students' comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice. Med Educ, 2001, 35(1):27-34.
12.	曾静, 左川, 卿平, 等. 在八年制医学生系统整合课程中开展基于真实病人PBL的初步探索及反馈. 中国高等医学教育, 2012, 25(4):1-2.
13.	Burgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools:a systematic review. Acad Med, 2014, 89(4):678-688.

1. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula:theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ, 2000, 34(9):721-728.
2. Colliver JA. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula:research and theory. Acad Med, 2000,75(3):259-266.
3. Kamin C, Sullivan PO, Deterding R, et al. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med, 2003, 78(2):204-211.
4. Diemers AD, vande Wiel MW, Scherpbier AJ, et al. Diagnostic reasoning and underlying knowledge of students with preclinical patient contacts in PBL. Med Educ, 2015, 49(12):1229-1238.
5. 曾静, 易群, 卿平, 等. 在八年制医学教育中进行系统整合课程体系改革的初步探索及反馈. 中国现代医学杂志, 2010, 20(22):3516-3519.
6. 曾静, 左川, 卿平, 等. 以 TBL 为核心建立系统整合课程考核体系的探索和思考. 中国高等医学教育, 2013, 26(10):69-70.
7. Sisk RJ. Team-based learning:systematic research review. J Nurs Educ, 2011, 50(12):665-669.
8. 程念珍, 李映兰, 王曙红, 等. PBL教学模式在外科护理学实习教学中的应用. 中国现代医学杂志, 2011, 21(10):1271-1273.
9. 彭志行, 赵杨, 易洪刚. PBL教学模式在医学统计学教学中的应用. 中国高等医学教育, 2010, 23(3):79-81.
10. Lai CS, Lu PY. A transformation of preclinical paper-based PBL to real patient-based PBL. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2009, 25(5):227-228.
11. Dammers J, Spencer J, Thomas M. Using real patients in problem-based learning:students' comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in a problem-based learning module in general practice. Med Educ, 2001, 35(1):27-34.
12. 曾静, 左川, 卿平, 等. 在八年制医学生系统整合课程中开展基于真实病人PBL的初步探索及反馈. 中国高等医学教育, 2012, 25(4):1-2.
13. Burgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools:a systematic review. Acad Med, 2014, 89(4):678-688.

Previous Article
Association of Arterial Stiffness with Cardiovascular Risk Factors: the Northern Shanghai Study XUJin, QINYan-li, WANGKai, LVYu-yan, XIONGJing, BAIBin, YUShi-kai, ZHOUYi-wu, CHIChen, ZHANGYi, XUYa-wei
Next Article
Diagnostic Value of MRI combined with Ultrasound for Lymph Node in Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis ZHANGRong, LIUHai-feng, HUSha-sha, PEICai-xia, MAWen-ting, LIJin-kui, GUOQi-hong

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

A Comparative Study on the Teaching Effectiveness between Patient based Problem-based Learning and Conventional Bedside Teaching

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content