1. |
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, et al. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet, 2006, 367(9524): 1747-1757.
|
2. |
Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Morice MC, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease. Heart, 2004, 90(6): 713-722.
|
3. |
Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation, 2004, 109(10): 1244-1249.
|
4. |
Zhang F, Dong L, Ge J, et al. Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart, 2009, 95(20): 1676-1681.
|
5. |
Hakeem A, Fmbhatti K. Provisional vs. complex stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Inv Cardiol, 2009, 21(11): 589-595.
|
6. |
Niccoli G, Ferrante G, Porto I, et al. Coronary bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both? A meta-analysis of patients treated with drug eluting stents. Int J Cardiol, 2010, 139(1): 80-91.
|
7. |
Gao XF, Zhang YJ, Tian NL, et al. Stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of nine randomised trials and systematic review. Eurointervention, 2014, 10(5): 561-569.
|
8. |
Koh YS, Kim PJ, Chang K, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two- stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents. J Interv Cardiol, 2013, 26(3): 245-253.
|
9. |
Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH –II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 57(8): 914-920.
|
10. |
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). Available at: http://www. cochrane-handbook.org.
|
11. |
Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J, 2004, 148(5): 857-864.
|
12. |
Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation, 2006, 114(18): 1955-1961.
|
13. |
Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J, 2008, 29(23): 2859-2867.
|
14. |
Jensen JS, Galløe A, Lassen JF, et al. Safety in simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions. The nordic bifurcation study 14-month follow-up results. EuroIntervention, 2008, 4(2): 229-233.
|
15. |
Behan MW, Holm NR, de Belder AJ, et al. Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with simple or complex stenting: 5-year survival from patient-level pooled analysis of the Nordic bifurcation study and the British bifurcation coronary study. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37(24): 1923-1928.
|
16. |
Korn HV, Yu J, Ohlow MA, et al. Interventional therapy of bifurcation lesions a TIMI flow-guided concept to treat side branches in bifurcation lesions-a prospective randomized clinical study (thueringer bifurcation study, THUEBIS study as pilot trial). Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2009, 2(6): 535-542.
|
17. |
Hildick-Smith D, Miles WB, Jens FL, et al. The EBC Two study (European Bifurcation Coronary Two) a randomized comparison of provisional t-stenting versus a systematic 2 stent culotte strategy in large caliber true bifurcations. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(9): e003643.
|
18. |
Zhang L, Zhong W, Luo Y, et al. A pilot study on culottes versus crossover single stenting for true coronary bifurcation lesions. Acta Cardiol Sin, 2016, 32(4): 450-459.
|
19. |
Lin QF, Luo YC, Peng YF, et al. Choice of stenting strategy in true coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Coronary Artery Disease, 2010, 21(6): 345-351.
|
20. |
Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation, 2010, 121(10): 1235-1243.
|
21. |
Behan MW, Holm NR, Curzen NP, et al. Simple or complex stenting for bifurcation coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled-analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4(1): 57-64.
|
22. |
Fei Y, Chen SL, Zhang JJ, et al. Hemodynamic changes of fractional flow reserve after double kissing crush and provisional stenting technique for true bifurcation lesions. Chin Med J (Engl), 2012, 125(15): 2658-2662.
|
23. |
vander Heijden LC, Kok MM, Lam MK, et al. Bifurcation treatment with novel, highly flexible drug-eluting coronary stents in all-comers: 2-year outcome in patients of the DUTCH PEERS trial. Clin Res Cardiol, 2016, 105(3): 206-215.
|
24. |
Diletti R, Garciagarcia HM, Bourantas CV, et al. Clinical outcomes after zotarolimus and everolimus drug eluting stent implantation in coronary artery bifurcation lesions: insights from the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial. Heart, 2013, 99(99): 1267-1274.
|
25. |
Maeng M, Holm NR, Erglis A, et al. Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(1): 30-34.
|
26. |
Kim YH, Lee JH, Roh JH, et al. Randomized comparisons between different stenting approaches for bifurcation coronary lesions with or without side branch stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 20, 8(4): 550-560.
|
27. |
Ferenc M, Ayoub M, Büttner HJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study. EuroIntervention, 2015, 11(8): 856-859.
|
28. |
Généreux P, Kumsars I, Lesiak M, et al. A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 17, 65(6): 533-543.
|
29. |
成万钧, 周玉杰, 赵迎新, 等. TAP 技术与必要性支架术处理冠状动脉分叉病变的疗效对比. 中华心血管病杂志, 2010, 38(2): 131-134.
|
30. |
陈新军, 郑若龙, 钱惠东, 等. 单支架及双支架植入治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的临床疗效比较. 中华临床医师杂志电子版, 2011, 5(5): 1277-1282.
|
31. |
王光公, 王丽霞, 李永强, 等. 单支架与双支架置入治疗冠状动脉真性分叉病变临床分析. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2014, 28(9): 881-883.
|
32. |
曾令伟, 杨晶. 对吻支架与单支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变疗效的临床分析. 中国医药科学, 2016, 6(4): 21-23.
|
33. |
王天松, 冯旭霞, 李新明, 等. 对吻支架与单支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变疗效的临床研究. 中国综合临床, 2012, 28(12): 1287-1290.
|
34. |
Rigatelli G, Dell AF, Zuin M, et al. Complex coronary bifurcation revascularization by means of very minimal crushing and ultrathin biodegradable polymer DES: feasibility and 1-year outcomes of the "nano-crush" technique. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2017, 18 (1): 22-27.
|
35. |
Bennett J, Vanhaverbeke M, Vanden DN, et al. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in complex coronary bifurcation interventions: insights from an in vivo multimodality imaging study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(8): e003849.
|
36. |
Jang WJ, Park YH, Hahn JY, et al. Differential effect of side branch intervention on long-term clinical outcomes according to side branch stenosis after main vessel stenting: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II. Int J Cardiol, 2016, 221(15): 471-477.
|
37. |
Katritsis DG, Siontis GC, Ioannidis JP, et al. Double versus single stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2009, 2(5): 409-415.
|
38. |
Zimarino M, Corazzini A, Ricci F, et al. Late thrombosis after double versus single drug-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary bifurcations: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 6(7): 687-695.
|